IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i9p809-822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clusters, Linkages and Interregional Spillovers: Methodology and Policy Implications for the Two Dutch Mainports and the Rural North

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Oosterhaven
  • Gerard Eding
  • Dirk Stelder

Abstract

This paper develops a consistent framework to detect regional clusters of interrelated economic activity, and to evaluate both the regional and the national economic significance of individual sectors and regions. By using bi-regional input-output data it appears to be possible to distinguish systematically between intraregional clusters and linkages, and their interregional spillovers. The methodology is applied to three Dutch regions that are especially important from a spatial policy perspective. The conclusions, surprisingly, do not substantiate some of the traditional beliefs held, especially as regards the assumed importance of the Dutch transport sector. Cet article cherche a developper un systeme coherent apartir duquel on peut devoiler des grappes regionales d'activites economiques etroitement liees, et evaluer l'importance economique regionale et nationale des secteurs et des regions particuliers. A partir des tableaux d'echanges intersectoriels pour deux regions, il est possible de distinguer systematiquement entre les grappes et les maillages intrasectoriels, et leurs retombees interregionales. On applique la methodologie atrois regions en Hollande qui sont particulierement importantes sur le plan de la politique d'amenagement du territotoire. Il est a surprendre que les conclusions ne viennent pas a l'appui de quelques-unes des idees recues, notamment quant a l'importance du secteur du transport. Dieser Aufsatz entwickelt einen einheitlichen Rahmen zur Ermittlung regionaler Kluster zusammenhangender wirtschaftlicher Unternehmungen, und zur Bewertung der wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung einzelner Sektoren und Regionen auf regionaler wie auf Landesebene. Dank bi-regionaler Aufwands-und Ertragsdaten ist eine systematische Unterscheidung von intra-regionalen Klustern und Verknupfungen und ihrem interregionalen Uberschwappen moglich. Die Methodik wird auf drei niederlandische Regionen angewandt, die vom Gesichtspunkt der Raumpolitik her besonders wichtig sind. Uberraschenderweise erharten die Schlussfolgerungen nicht alle der traditionell vertretenen Meinungen, vorallem in Bezug auf die angenommene Bedeutung des niederlandischen

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Oosterhaven & Gerard Eding & Dirk Stelder, 2001. "Clusters, Linkages and Interregional Spillovers: Methodology and Policy Implications for the Two Dutch Mainports and the Rural North," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 809-822.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:9:p:809-822
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400120090239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400120090239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400120090239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & Moss Madden & Yoshio Kimura (ed.), 1999. "Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-03947-2.
    2. Paul Elhorst & Jan Oosterhaven & Frans Sijtsma & Dirk Stelder, 1999. "Welfare Effects of Spatial Deconcentration: A Scenario for the Netherlands," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 90(1), pages 17-31, February.
    3. P W J Batey & M Madden, 1981. "Demographic-Economic Forecasting within an Activity-Commodity Framework: Some Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 13(9), pages 1067-1083, September.
    4. Gerard Eding & Jan Oosterhaven & Bas Vet & Henk Nijmeijer, 1999. "Constructing Regional Supply and Use Tables: Dutch Experiences," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Michael Sonis & Moss Madden & Yoshio Kimura (ed.), Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure, chapter 12, pages 237-262, Springer.
    5. Edward Feser & Edward Bergman, 2000. "National Industry Cluster Templates: A Framework for Applied Regional Cluster Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19.
    6. Holub, H. W. & Schnabl, H., 1985. "Qualitative input-output analysis and structural information," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 67-73, January.
    7. repec:rri:bkchap:19 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Edward M. Bergman & Edward J. Feser, 2000. "Industrial and regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications," Wholbk, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, number 19 edited by Randall Jackson, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oosterhaven, Jan & Romp, Ward E. & Elhorst, J. Paul, 2002. "Integral assessment of urban conglomeration versus centre-periphery maglev rail systems under market imperfections," ERSA conference papers ersa02p008, European Regional Science Association.
    2. repec:dgr:rugsom:04c22 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. J. Elhorst & Jan Oosterhaven, 2006. "Forecasting the impact of transport improvements on commuting and residential choice," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 39-59, March.
    4. Elhorst, J. Paul & Oosterhaven, Jan & Romp, Ward E., 2001. "Integral cost-benefit analysis of Maglev technology under market imperfections," Research Report 04C22, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    5. Mirko Titze & Matthias Brachert & Alexander Kubis, 2011. "Local and regional knowledge sources of industrial clusters - methodical aspects in a multidimensional framework for cluster identification," ERSA conference papers ersa10p709, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Louis Mesnard, 2011. "Negatives in symmetric input–output tables: the impossible quest for the Holy Grail," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 46(2), pages 427-454, April.
    7. Randall Jackson & Walter Schwarm & Yasuhide Okuyama & Samia Islam, 2006. "A method for constructing commodity by industry flow matrices," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(4), pages 909-920, December.
    8. Romp, W.E. & Oosterhaven, J., 2002. "Indirect economic effects of a rail link along the afsluitdijk," Research Report 02C14, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    9. Cristina Santos & Alexandre Almeida & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2008. "Searching for clusters in tourism. A quantitative methodological proposal," FEP Working Papers 293, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    10. Edward M. Bergman & Gunther Maier & Patrick Lehner, 2008. "Banning the Bahn: transport Infrastructure effects on Austrian cluster firms," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1/2), pages 3-24.
    11. Kadokawa, Kazuo, 2011. "Applicability of Marshall’s Agglomeration Theory to Indus-trial Clustering in the Japanese Manufacturing Sector: An Exploratory Factor Analysis Approach," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-18.
    12. repec:elg:eechap:14395_18 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Koopmans, Carl & Oosterhaven, Jan, 2011. "SCGE modelling in cost-benefit analysis: The Dutch experience," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-36.
    14. Emanuela Todeva, 2015. "Market-Driven Clusters as Prerequisites and Consequences of Smart Specialisation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(2), pages 250-269, June.
    15. Titze, Mirko & Brachert, Matthias & Kubis, Alexander, 2010. "The Identification of Industrial Clusters – Methodical Aspects in a Multidimensional Framework for Cluster Identification," IWH Discussion Papers 14/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    16. Akgungor, Sedef & Fitzpatrick, Ellen T., 2004. "The Synergy Between Subsector Competitiveness And Regional Development: The Case Of Turkey And The Tomato Subsector," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20330, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Hector Rocha, 2004. "Entrepreneurship and Development: The Role of Clusters," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 363-400, October.
    18. repec:dgr:rugsom:02c14 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Mans, Pieter & Alkemade, Floortje & van der Valk, Tessa & Hekkert, Marko P., 2008. "Is cluster policy useful for the energy sector? Assessing self-declared hydrogen clusters in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1375-1385, April.
    20. Kambale Kavese & Andrew Phiri, 2019. "Microsimulations of a dynamic SUT economy-wide Leontief-based model for the South African economy," Working Papers 1910, Department of Economics, Nelson Mandela University, revised Nov 2019.
    21. Knaap, Thijs & Oosterhaven, Jan, 2011. "Measuring the welfare effects of infrastructure: A simple spatial equilibrium evaluation of Dutch railway proposals," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 19-28.
    22. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    23. Michelle Gilmartin & David Learmouth & J Kim Swales & Peter McGregor & Karen Turner, 2013. "Regional Policy Spillovers: The National Impact of Demand-Side Policy in an Interregional Model of the UK Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(4), pages 814-834, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:9:p:809-822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.