IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i5p415-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Firm Characteristics, Location and Regional Innovation: A Comparison Between Israeli and German Industrial Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Amnon Frenkel
  • Daniel Shefer
  • Knut Koschatzky
  • Gunter Walter

Abstract

In recent years, a growing number of researchers have been attempting to gain a better understanding of the variation in the rate of spatial innovation of different industrial plants. Several of these studies have investigated the similarity and dissimilarity of spatial innovation between countries. This paper reports the results of a large study carried out jointly by a team of researchers from Germany and Israel. In Germany, the study focused on Baden, the western part of the state of Baden-Wurttemberg; and in Israel, on the Northern district. Altogether in both countries, more than 400 industrial plants belonging to the fastest-growing industrial branches (electronics, metals and plastics) were included in the study. The use of simple statistical models, augmented by multi-variate logit models, enabled us to point out the similarity and dissimilarity in spatial innovation patterns in the two countries. The results support the hypothesis that expenditure on R&D is a good surrogate for the percentage of innovative firms among all firms in its sector, regardless of the industrial branch to which the plants belong. In general, we can conclude that there exists a strong similarity in the frequency of industrial innovation in both countries and that the share of innovative firms in the high-tech industries is significantly higher than in the traditional industries. On the other hand, the distribution of spatial variations in the share of innovative firms in Israel is greater than that found in Germany. Dans les annees recentes, un nombre croissant de chercheurs ont essaye de mieux comprendre la variation de l'innovation geographique des divers etablissements industriels. Plusieurs etudes ont examine la similarite et la difference de l'innovation geographique suivant le pays. Cet article cherche a presenter les resultats qui proviennent d'une etude detaillee conjointement faite par une equipe de chercheurs allemands et israeliens. En Allemagne, l'etude a porte sur Baden, la partie ouest de l'etat de Baden-Wurttemburg, et en Israël, elle a focalise sur la region du nord. Les deux pays confondus, on a inclus plus de 400 etablissements industriels des secteurs industriels en pleine expansion (electronque, metaux et plastiques). L'emploi des mode les statistiques simples, augmentes par des modeles du type logit a variantes multiples, a permis de signaler la similarite et la difference de la distribution de l'innovation geographique dans les deux pays. Les resultats viennent a l'appui de l'hypothese suivant: la depense pour la R et D remplace efficacement le pourcentage des entreprises innovatrices d'un secteur donne, quel que soit le secteur d'activite en question. D'une maniere generale, on peut conclure qu'il existe une similarite forte quant a la frequence de l'innovation industrielle dans les deux pays, et que la proportion des entreprises innovatrices au sein des industries de pointe s'avere nettement superieure a ce qu'elle ne l'est dans les industries traditionnelles. En outre, la distribution de la variation geographique de la part des entreprises innovatrices situees en Israël est superieure a ce que l'on n'avait trouve en Allemagne. In den letzten Jahren hat eine wachsende Anzahl Forscher sich um ein besseres Verstandis fur Schwankungen in der Rate raumlicher Innovation in verschiedenen Industriebetrieben bemuht. Einige dieser Studien haben Ahnlichkeiten und Abweichungen raumlicher Innovation zwischen Landern untersucht. Dieser Aufsatz berichtet uber die Ergebnisse einer gross angelegten Untersuchung, die von einer Forschungsgruppe aus Deutschland und Israel gemeinsam durchgefuhrt wurde. In Deutschland konzentrierte man sich auf Baden, den westlichen Teil des Landes Baden-Wurttemberg, und in Israel auf den nordlichen Landesteil. In beiden Landern zusammen wurden uber 400 Industriebetriebe der am schnellsten wachsenden Industriezweige (Elektronik, Metalle und Plastik) in die Untersuchung einbezogen. Die Anwendung einfacher statistischer Modelle, durch mehrfach variable Logitmodelle verstarkt, gestattete der Forschungsgruppe, in beiden Landern die Ahnlichkeiten und Abweichungen bei raumlichen Innovationsmustern aufzuzeigen. Die Ergebnisse untermauern die Hypothese, dass Aufwendungen fur Forschung und Entwicklung ein guter Ersatz fur den Prozentsatz innovativer Firmen in der Gesamtzahl der Firmen in ihrem Sektor ist, ungeachtet der Industriebranche, der der Betrieb angehort. Im allgemeinen kann man folgern, dass in beiden Landern starke Ahnlichkeiten bei industrieller Innovation zu beobachten sind und dass der Anteil innovativer Firmen in den Spitzentechnologiefirmen bedeutend hoher ist als in den am Alten festhaltenden Firmen. Die Verteilung der raumlichen Schwankungen am Anteil innovativer Firmen ist jedoch grosser in Israel als in Deutschland.

Suggested Citation

  • Amnon Frenkel & Daniel Shefer & Knut Koschatzky & Gunter Walter, 2001. "Firm Characteristics, Location and Regional Innovation: A Comparison Between Israeli and German Industrial Firms," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 415-429.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:5:p:415-429
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400123360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400123360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400123360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moomaw, Ronald L., 1983. "Is population scale a worthless surrogate for business agglomeration economies?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 525-545, November.
    2. Amnon Frenkel, 2000. "Can regional policy affect firms' innovation potential in lagging regions?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 34(3), pages 315-341.
    3. Mansfield, Edwin, 1991. "Academic research and industrial innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, February.
    4. E J Malecki, 1977. "Firms and Innovation Diffusion: Examples from Banking," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 9(11), pages 1291-1305, November.
    5. Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-970, December.
    6. E J Malecki & P Nijkamp, 1988. "Technology and Regional Development: Some Thoughts on Policy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 6(4), pages 383-399, December.
    7. Evert Jan Davelaar & Peter Nijkamp, 1997. "Spatial Dispersion of Technological Innovation: A Review," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Silvana Lombardo & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Innovative Behaviour in Space and Time, chapter 2, pages 17-40, Springer.
    8. Grossman, Gene M & Helpman, Elhanan, 1990. "Trade, Innovation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 86-91, May.
    9. Giovanni Dosi, 1984. "Technical Change and Industrial Transformation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-17521-5, December.
    10. Maryann P. Feldman & Aydan S. Kutay, 1997. "Innovation and Strategy in Space: Towards a New Location Theory of the Firm," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Silvana Lombardo & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Innovative Behaviour in Space and Time, chapter 12, pages 239-250, Springer.
    11. Davelaar, Evert Jan & Nijkamp, Peter, 1988. "The Incubator Hypothesis: Re-vitalization of Metropolitan Areas?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 22(3), pages 48-65, November.
    12. Paul M. Romer, 1994. "The Origins of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 3-22, Winter.
    13. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 1994. "Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 23-44, Winter.
    14. Beise, Marian & Stahl, Harald, 1999. "Public research and industrial innovations in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 397-422, April.
    15. N Alderman & M M Fischer, 1992. "Innovation and Technological Change: An Austrian-British Comparison," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(2), pages 273-288, February.
    16. Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Silvana Lombardo & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), 1997. "Innovative Behaviour in Space and Time," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-60720-2, February.
    17. Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Manfred M. Fischer & Giorgio Preto (ed.), 1995. "Technological Change, Economic Development and Space," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-79760-6, February.
    18. Knut Koschatzky, 1998. "Firm Innovation and Region: The Role of Space in Innovation Processes," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(04), pages 383-408.
    19. Giovanni Dosi, 2000. "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," Chapters, in: Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 63-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 1997. "Endogenous Technological Change, Long Run Growth and Spatial Interdependence: A Survey," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Silvana Lombardo & Peter Nijkamp (ed.), Innovative Behaviour in Space and Time, chapter 11, pages 213-238, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannis Baraklianos & Louafi Bouzouina & Ouassim Manout & Patrick Bonnel, 2018. "To what extent do location choices of new and relocating economic establishments differ in terms of preference for accessibility?," Working Papers hal-01801448, HAL.
    2. Stephan Brunow & Valentina Nafts, 2013. "What types of firms tend to be more innovative: A study on Germany," Norface Discussion Paper Series 2013021, Norface Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London.
    3. Amalya L. Oliver & Kathleen Montgomery & Shimrit Barda, 2020. "The multi-level process of trust and learning in university–industry innovation collaborations," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 758-779, June.
    4. Dafna Schwartz & Raphael Bar-El, 2006. "Venture Investments in Israel - A Regional Perspective Dafna Schwartz and Raphael Bar-El Ben-Gurion University, School of Management, Israel," ERSA conference papers ersa06p868, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Dimitratos, Pavlos & Liouka, Ioanna & Young, Stephen, 2009. "Regional location of multinational corporation subsidiaries and economic development contribution: Evidence from the UK," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 180-191, April.
    6. Theodore Metaxas, 2011. "Regional Investments in Southern European Cities," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 61(1-2), pages 55-79, January -.
    7. Dafna Schwartz & Joseph Pelzman & Michael Keren, 2008. "The Ineffectiveness of Location Incentive Programs," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 22(2), pages 167-179, May.
    8. Roberto Ganau & Eleonora Di Maria, 2014. "Determinants of technological innovation in SMEs. Firm-level factors, agglomeration economies and the role of KIBS providers," ERSA conference papers ersa14p820, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Metaxas, Theodore, 2010. "Investment images in Southern Europe: an appreciation of firms in four Southern European cities," MPRA Paper 41023, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2010.
    10. Gao, Ya & Li, Bing & Sun, Weizeng, 2023. "Resource curse on innovation: A perspective on local mining industry monopolies in resource-based cities in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Hua Liang & Zongyi Zhang, 2012. "The effects of industry characteristics on the sources of technological product and process innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 867-884, December.
    12. Ke Zhang & Jenny Jing Wang & Yanqi Sun & Sarowar Hossain, 2021. "Financial slack, institutional shareholding and enterprise innovation investment: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 3235-3259, June.
    13. Ivana Blažková & Ondřej Dvouletý, 2022. "Zombies: Who are they and how do firms become zombies?," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 119-145, January.
    14. Ana Paula Faria & Natália Barbosa & Vasco Eiriz, 2015. "Firm Innovation and Co-Location in Portugal," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 574-592, December.
    15. Amnon Frenkel, 2001. "Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region," ERSA conference papers ersa01p38, European Regional Science Association.
    16. Harris, Richard & Li, Qian Cher & Trainor, Mary, 2009. "Is a higher rate of R&D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R&D in disadvantaged regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 192-205, February.
    17. Philip Cooke & Dafna Schwartz, 2008. "Regional Knowledge Economies: An Eu‐Uk And Israel Perspective," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(2), pages 178-192, April.
    18. Feng, Gen-Fu & Zheng, Mingbo & Wen, Jun & Chang, Chun-Ping & Chen, Yin E., 2019. "The assessment of globalization on innovation in Chinese manufacturing firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 190-202.
    19. Domingo Fernández-Uclés & Saida Elfkih & Adoración Mozas-Moral & Enrique Bernal-Jurado & Miguel Jesús Medina-Viruel & Saker Ben Abdallah, 2020. "Economic Efficiency in the Tunisian Olive Oil Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amnon Frenkel & Daniel Shefer & Knut Koschatzky & Gunter Walter, 1998. "Industrial characteristics, production milieu and regional innovation: A comparison of Israel and German industrial plants," ERSA conference papers ersa98p383, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Amnon Frenkel, 2001. "Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region," ERSA conference papers ersa01p38, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Dirk Czarnitzki & Hanna Hottenrott, 2009. "Are Local Milieus The Key To Innovation Performance?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 81-112, February.
    4. Daniel Shefer, 2011. "The Center-periphery Dilemma and the Issue of Equity in Regional Development," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1192, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Salter, Ammon J. & Martin, Ben R., 2001. "The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 509-532, March.
    6. Luc Anselin & Attila Varga & Zoltan Acs, 2008. "Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 9, pages 95-121, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Blind, Knut & Grupp, Hariolf, 1999. "Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 451-468, June.
    8. Tassey, Gregory, 2005. "The disaggregated technology production function: A new model of university and corporate research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 287-303, April.
    9. Mahmut Yaşar & Catherine Paul, 2012. "Firm performance and knowledge spillovers from academic, industrial and foreign linkages: the case of China," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 237-253, December.
    10. Shang, Qingyan & Poon, Jessie P.H. & Yue, Qingtang, 2012. "The role of regional knowledge spillovers on China's innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 1164-1175.
    11. Becker Wolfgang & Peters Jürgen, 2005. "Innovation Effects of Science-Related Technological Opportunities / Innovationseffekte von technologischen Möglichkeiten aus dem Wissenschaftsbereich: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 225(2), pages 130-150, April.
    12. Samia Nour, 2014. "The Importance (Impacts) of Knowledge at the Macro–Micro Levels in the Arab Gulf Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 521-537, September.
    13. Nelson, Andrew J., 2012. "Putting university research in context: Assessing alternative measures of production and diffusion at Stanford," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 678-691.
    14. Autant-Bernard, Corinne, 2001. "Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1069-1078, August.
    15. Broström, Anders, 2010. "Working with distant researchers--Distance and content in university-industry interaction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1311-1320, December.
    16. Yee Kyoung Kim & Keun Lee, 2015. "Different Impacts of Scientific and Technological Knowledge on Economic Growth: Contrasting Science and Technology Policy in East Asia and Latin America," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 10(1), pages 43-66, January.
    17. Nour, Samia Satti Osman Mohamed, 2013. "The importance and impacts of knowledge at the macro-micro levels in the Arab Gulf countries," MERIT Working Papers 2013-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    18. Mario COCCIA, 2018. "Evolution of the economics of science in the Twenty Century," Journal of Economics Library, KSP Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 65-84, March.
    19. Hong, Wei & Su, Yu-Sung, 2013. "The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 454-464.
    20. Wang, Fang, 2024. "Does the recombination of distant scientific knowledge generate valuable inventions? An analysis of pharmaceutical patents," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:5:p:415-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.