IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v35y2001i2p103-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Analysis of a Water Quality Enhancing Policy: A Simple Input-Output Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Bae Kim
  • Sang Youp Jin
  • Kap Sik Yun

Abstract

It is generally believed that there exists a trade-off between economic activity and environmental quality since pollutants are generated in the process of production and consumption of commodities. The literature shows, however, that there have been relatively few empirical attempts to analyse this trade-off relationship. This tendency may stem from the fact that there is insufficient data to represent the environmental sector. This paper has constructed the environmental sector endogenized multi-region input-output (ESEMRIO) model in order to measure the impacts of water quality enhancing policy on the Korean economy of two regions, recognizing the environmental sector as a resourceusing sector. The ESEMRIO model specifically estimates the impacts of the policy on the economy in terms of the policy costs, industrial output and employment. En regle generale, l'idee recue c'est qu'il existe un compromis entre l'activite economique et la qualite de l'environnement dans la mesure ou la production et la consommation des denrees impliquent la creation des polluants. Toujours est-il que la documentation laisse voir que rares sont les etudes empiriques qui analysent ce compromis. Il est possible que cette tendance remonte au manque de donnees relatives a l'environnement. Cet article a cherche a construire pour l'environnement un modele multiregional endogene portant sur les echanges interindustriels (ESEMRIO) afin de mesurer les retombees d'une politique en faveur de la valorisation des eaux sur deux regions au sein de l'economie coreenne, tout en considerant l'environnement comme usager des ressources. Plus particulierement, le modele ESEMRIO estime les retombees de la politique sur l'economie en termes des couts de la politique, du rendement industriel et de l'emploi. Da beim Produktionsvorgang und beim Verbrauch von Bedarfsgutern Umweltverschmutzung entsteht, wird allgemein angenommen, dass Einbussen entweder bei wirtschaftlichen Unternehmungen oder in der Qualitat der Umwelt zu verzeichnen sind. Die Literatur zeigt jedoch, dass verhaltnismassig wenig empirische Versuche unternommen worden sind, die Beziehung von jeweiligen Verlusten zu analysieren. Diese Tendenz mag der Tatsache zuzuschreiben sein, dass es nur ungenugend Daten fur eine Darstellung des Umweltsektors gibt. In diesem Aufsatz wird ein mehrregionales endogenisiertes Aufwands-Ertragsmodell fur den Umweltsektor (environmental sector endogenized multi-region input-output= ESEMRIO) konstruiert, um die Auswirkungen der Wasserverbesserungsbestrebungen auf zwei Regionen der koreanischen Wirtschaft zu messen, wobei der Unweltsektor als ein Rohstoffe nutzender Sektor verstanden wird. Das ESEMRIO berechnet insbesondere die Auswirkungen der Bestrebungen auf die Wirtschaft in Bezug auf die Kosten der Bestrebungen, industrielle Leistung und Erwerbstatigkeit.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Bae Kim & Sang Youp Jin & Kap Sik Yun, 2001. "Impact Analysis of a Water Quality Enhancing Policy: A Simple Input-Output Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 103-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:2:p:103-111
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400120033098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400120033098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400120033098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liew, Chung Ja, 1984. "Pollution-related variable input-output model: The Tulsa SMSA as a case study," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 327-349, May.
    2. Miranowski, John & Rhee, J., 1984. "Determination of Income, Production, and Employment Under Pollution Control: An Input-Output Approach," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10709, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Rhee, Jeong J & Miranowski, John A, 1984. "Determination of Income, Production, and Employment under Pollution Control: An Input-Output Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(1), pages 146-150, February.
    4. Leontief, Wassily, 1970. "Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(3), pages 262-271, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masaru Ichihashi & Shinji Kaneko, 2011. "Impact Analysis of Changes in The Price of Water Resources in China and Beijing," IDEC DP2 Series 1-5, Hiroshima University, Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC).
    2. Xiangzheng Deng & Fan Zhang & Zhan Wang & Xing Li & Tao Zhang, 2014. "An Extended Input Output Table Compiled for Analyzing Water Demand and Consumption at County Level in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-20, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kieran Donaghy & Clifford R. Wymer & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings & Soo Jung Ha, 2017. "Structural change in the Chicago region and the impact on emission inventories in a continuous-time modeling approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 6(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Hawdon, David & Pearson, Peter, 1995. "Input-output simulations of energy, environment, economy interactions in the UK," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 73-86, January.
    3. Wu, C. C. & Chang, N. B., 2003. "Grey input-output analysis and its application for environmental cost allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 175-201, February.
    4. P J G Pearson, 1989. "Proactive Energy-Environment Policy Strategies: A Role for Input — Output Analysis?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(10), pages 1329-1348, October.
    5. Taelim Choi & Randall W. Jackson & Nancey Green Leigh & Christa D. Jensen, 2011. "A Baseline Input—Output Model with Environmental Accounts (IOEA) Applied to E-Waste Recycling," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 34(1), pages 3-33, January.
    6. Daniel Moran & Richard Wood, 2014. "Convergence Between The Eora, Wiod, Exiobase, And Openeu'S Consumption-Based Carbon Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, September.
    7. Li, Yilin & Chen, Bin & Li, Chaohui & Li, Zhi & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "Energy perspective of Sino-US trade imbalance in global supply chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Zhu, Bangzhu & Su, Bin & Li, Yingzhu & Ng, Tsan Sheng, 2020. "Embodied energy and intensity in China’s (normal and processing) exports and their driving forces, 2005-2015," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Kumar, Indraneel & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sinha, Kumares C., 2016. "Input–output life cycle environmental assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from utility scale wind energy in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 294-301.
    10. Yannic Rehm & Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Measuring the Carbon Content of Wealth Evidence from France and Germany," PSE Working Papers halshs-03828939, HAL.
    11. Daniel Croner & Ivan Frankovic, 2018. "A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Global and NationalEnergy Intensity Trends," The Energy Journal, , vol. 39(2), pages 103-122, March.
    12. Stern, David I., 1997. "Limits to substitution and irreversibility in production and consumption: A neoclassical interpretation of ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 197-215, June.
    13. Minihan, Erin S. & Wu, Ziping, 2011. "The Potential Economic and Environmental Costs of GHG Mitigation Measures for Cattle Sectors in Northern Ireland," 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 108779, Agricultural Economics Society.
    14. Bruckner, Martin & Giljum, Stefan & Fischer, Günther & Tramberend, Sylvia & Börner, Jan, 2018. "The global cropland footprint of the non-food bioeconomy," Discussion Papers 271062, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    15. Eivind Lekve Bjelle & Johannes Többen & Konstantin Stadler & Thomas Kastner & Michaela C. Theurl & Karl-Heinz Erb & Kjartan-Steen Olsen & Kirsten S. Wiebe & Richard Wood, 2020. "Adding country resolution to EXIOBASE: impacts on land use embodied in trade," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Suh, Sangwon, 2004. "Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 451-467, April.
    17. Lixiao Zhang & Qiuhong Hu & Fan Zhang, 2014. "Input-Output Modeling for Urban Energy Consumption in Beijing: Dynamics and Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    18. Fritz, Oliver M. & Sonis, Michael & Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., 1998. "A Miyazawa analysis of interactions between polluting and non-polluting sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 289-305, September.
    19. Robert Ayres, 1995. "Thermodynamics and process analysis for future economic scenarios," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(3), pages 207-230, October.
    20. Roca, Jordi & Serrano, Monica, 2007. "Income growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: An input-output approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 230-242, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:35:y:2001:i:2:p:103-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.