IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v34y2000i8p753-767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mergers/Acquisitions and Restructuring in the EU Chemical Industry: Patterns and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Chapman
  • Helen Edmond

Abstract

CHAPMAN K. and EDMOND H. (2000) Mergers/acquisitions and restructuring in the EU chemical industry: patterns and implications, Reg. Studies 34, 753-767. High levels of merger/acquisition activity, especially international transactions, have been a characteristic of the global economy since the mid - 1980s. A significant proportion of this activity has been focused on the EU where it has been stimulated by economic integration. Research into the phenomenon has been limited by data availability. Information from a Royal Society of Chemistry database is used to examine mergers/acquisitions in the European chemical industry. This is a key sector of the European economy which has accounted for a substantial proportion of mergers/ acquisitions in manufacturing. Attention is focused upon an important period of change immediately before and after the creation of the Single European Market (i.e. 1986-95). The connections between mergers/acquisitions, corporate restructuring and industry restructuring are explored together with implications for the changing geography of the EU production system. Mergers/acquisitions are both a symptom and, more importantly, a cause of accelerated change in this system as they facilitate the transformation of corporate identities. Some of the wider consequences of such transformations are addressed by exploring the geographical pattern of cross - border mergers/acquisitions in the EU chemical industry. A systematic transfer of corporate control is demonstrated as companies based in northern Europe have acquired those based in southern Europe. Reasons for this pattern are identified together with implications of post - merger/acquisition restructuring for places and, more generally, for economic and social cohesion within the EU. The need for more detailed empirical studies of corporate restructuring is stressed. CHAPMAN K. et EDMOND H. (2000) Fusions/acquisitions et restructuration de l'industrie chimique dans l'Ue: tendances et retombees, Reg. Studies 34, 753-767. Depuis le milieu des annees 1980, l'economie mondiale se caracterise par de nombreuses fusions/acquisitions, surtout des operations internationales. Encouragee par l'integration economique, une proportion non-negligeable de ces operations s'est focalisee sur l'Ue. La disponibilite des donnees limite la recherche sur ce phenomene. A partir d'une base de donnees provenant de l'Academie de chimie (Royal Society of Chemistry), on examine les fusions/acquisitions dans l'industrie chimique europenne. C'est un secteur-cle de l'economie europeenne qui a assure une proportion considerable des fusions/acquisitions industrielles. On attire l'attention sur une periode transitoire, juste avant et apres le moment ou le marche unique europeen arrive a echeance (a savoir, de 1986 a 1995). Les liens entre les fusions/acquisitions, la restructuration d'entreprise et la restructuration industrielle se voient examiner conjointement avec leurs retombees eventuelles sur la geographie du systeme de production europeen en pleine evolution. Les fusions/acquisitions sont ala fois des symptomes et des causes du changement accelere de ce systeme au fur et a mesure qu'elles permettent la transformation de l'image de marque des entreprises. On aborde certaines des retombees eventuelles plus importantes de cette evolution en examinant la distribution geographique des fusions/acquisitions transfrontalieres dans l'industrie chimique de l'Ue. Il s'avere un transfert du controle d'entreprise systematique au fur et a mesure que les entreprises situees dans le nord de l'Europe ont acquis celles situees dans le sud. On identifie les raisons d'une telle distribution conjointement avec les retombees eventuelles de la restructuration a la suite des fusions/acquisitions pour des endroits et, de facon plus generale, pour la cohesion economique et sociale au sein de l'Ue. On souligne la necessitedes etudes empiriques plus approfondies de la restructuration d'entreprise. CHAPMAN K. und EDMOND H. (2000) Fusionen/Ubernahmen und Umstrukturierung der chemischen Industrie in der EU: Muster und Implikationen, Reg. Studies 34, 753- 767. Hohe Quoten bei Fusionen/Ubernahmen sind seit der Mitte der achziger Jahre ein Merkmal der globalen Wirtschaft gewesen, besonders auf dem Gebiet der internationalen Transaktionen. Ein bedeutender Teil dieser Unternehmungen betraf die EU, wo der wirtschaftliche Zusammenschluss sie nahelegte. Untersuchungen dieses Phanomens waren durch den Mangel an verfugbaren Daten beschrankt. Hier werden Informationen einer Datenbank der Royal Society of Chemistry dazu benutzt, Fusionen/Ubernahmen in der chemischen Industrie Europas zu untersuchen. Sie stellt einen Schlusselsektor der europaischen Wirtschaft dar, und ist fur einen wesentlichen Teil der Fusionen/Ubernahme in der herstellenden Industrie verantwortlich. Die Aufmerksamkeit konzentriert sich auf einen wichtigen Zeitraum der Umstellung unmittelbar vor und nach der Schaffung des Einheitlichen Europaischen Marktes (1986-1995). Es werden sowohl Verbindungen zwischen Fusionen/Ubernahmen, korporativer Umstrukturierung und industrieller Umstrukturierung untersucht als auch die Implikationen fur die im Wandel begriffene Geographie der Produktionssystem der EU. Fusionen/Ubernahmen sind Symptom, und, was noch wichtiger ist, auch Ursache des beschleunigten Wandels in dem System, indem sie die Transformation korporativer Identitaten erleichtern. Ausgewahlte umfassendere Konsequenzen solcher Transformationen werden mit Hilfe einer Untersuchung der geographischen Muster grenzuberschreitende Fusionen/Ubernahmen in der chemischen Industrie der EU behandelt. Es wird eine systematische Ubernahme der korporativen Leitung aufgezeigt, in der nordeuropasche Gesellschaften die in Sudeuropa beheimateten erworben haben. Grunde fur dieses Muster und fur Implikationen der Umstrukturierung von Orten in Folge von Fusion/ Ubernahme sowie fur wortschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt in der EU werden herausgestellt. Der Bedarf an ins Einzelne gehenden empirischen Studien korporativer Umstrukturierung wird betont.

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Chapman & Helen Edmond, 2000. "Mergers/Acquisitions and Restructuring in the EU Chemical Industry: Patterns and Implications," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 753-767.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:8:p:753-767
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050192847
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400050192847
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400050192847?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A.J. Fielding, 1994. "Industrial Change and Regional Development in Western Europe," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(4-5), pages 679-704, May.
    2. Ray Hudson, 1997. "Regional Futures: Industrial Restructuring, New High Volume Production Concepts and Spatial Development Strategies in the New Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 467-478.
    3. Collins, Robert & Schmenner, Roger, 1995. "Taking manufacturing advantage of Europe's single market," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 257-268, September.
    4. Curry, B & George, K D, 1983. "Industrial Concentration: A Survey," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 203-255, March.
    5. J Howells, 1992. "Pharmaceuticals and Europe 1992: The Dynamics of Industrial Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(1), pages 33-48, January.
    6. A Amin & A Malmberg, 1992. "Competing Structural and Institutional Influences on the Geography of Production in Europe," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 401-416, March.
    7. J H Love, 1994. "EC Mergers Regulation and Regional Economic Cohesion," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(1), pages 137-152, January.
    8. John H. Dunning, 1997. "The European Internal Market Programme and Inbound Foreign Direct Investment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1-30, March.
    9. John H. Dunning, 1997. "The European Internal Market Programme and Inbound Foreign Direct Investment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 189-223, June.
    10. Leo Sleuwaegen, 1998. "Cross‐border Mergers and EC Competition Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 1077-1093, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parhankangas, Annaleena & Arenius, Pia, 2003. "From a corporate venture to an independent company: a base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 463-481, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans-Martin Zademach, 2006. "Germany as an emerging archipelago economy: On some less obvious implications of corporate takeovers and mergers," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(01), pages 40-45, April.
    2. Peter J. Buckley & Jeremy Clegg & Nicolas Forsans & Kevin T. Reilly, 2010. "A Simple and Flexible Dynamic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment Growth: The Canada-United States Relationship in the Context of Free Trade," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Foreign Direct Investment, China and the World Economy, chapter 17, pages 386-418, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Pain, Nigel & Young, Garry, 2004. "The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 387-408, May.
    4. Ray Barrell & Sylvia Gottschalk & Dawn Holland & Ehsan Khoman & Iana Liadze & Olga Pomerantz, 2008. "The impact of EMU on growth and employment," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 318, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    5. Crone, Mike & Roper, Stephen, 1999. "Knowledge Transfers from Multi-national Plants in Northern Ireland," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa053, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Sánchez-Martín, Miguel Eduardo & de Arce, Rafael & Escribano, Gonzalo, 2014. "Do changes in the rules of the game affect FDI flows in Latin America? A look at the macroeconomic, institutional and regional integration determinants of FDI," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 279-299.
    7. Puah, Chin-Hong & Kueh, Jerome Swee-Hui & Lau, Evan, 2007. "The Implications Of Emergence Of China Towards Asean-5: Fdi-Gdp Perspective," MPRA Paper 4550, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Grazia Ietto-Gillies, 2011. "The Integration and Fragmentation Roles of Transnational Companies," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Li, Qiaomin & Scollay, Robert & Maani, Sholeh, 2016. "Effects on China and ASEAN of the ASEAN-China FTA: The FDI perspective," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-19.
    10. Aradhna Aggarwal, 2008. "Regional Economic Integration and FDI in South Asia - Prospects and Problems," Macroeconomics Working Papers 22141, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    11. Holmes, Peter & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier, 2011. "The Nature and Evolution of Vertical Specialisation: What is the Role of Preferential Trade Agreements?," Papers 222, World Trade Institute.
    12. Simionescu, Mihaela, 2017. "The Influence of Brexit on the Foreign Direct Investment Projects and Inflows in the United Kingdom," GLO Discussion Paper Series 68, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:969-1000 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Davide Vannoni, 1999. "Entries and Exits in Foreign Markets: Italian Firms' Multinational Expansion in the European Union," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 181-196.
    15. Zimny, Zbigniew, 2004. "Long-term trends in international production," EIB Papers 2/2004, European Investment Bank, Economics Department.
    16. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Lars Oxelheim, 2000. "Does Foreign Direct Investment Replace Home Country Investment? The Effect of European Integration on the Location of Swedish Investment," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 199-221, June.
    17. José De Sousa & Julie Lochard, 2004. "Investissements directs étrangers et intégration : quels enseignements pour les Peco ?," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 163(2), pages 87-100.
    18. Daniela Pîrvu & Anca Cojocaru, 2013. "Foreign direct investment, economic crisis and the European Union," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 16(49), pages 147-156, September.
    19. Clegg, Jeremy & Cross, Adam R., 2000. "Affiliate and non-affiliate intellectual property transactions in international business: an empirical overview of the UK and USA," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 407-430, August.
    20. Dorothee J. Feils & Manzur Rahman, 2011. "The Impact of Regional Integration on Insider and Outsider FDI," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 41-63, February.
    21. repec:got:cegedp:15 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Jungnickel, Rolf & Keller, Dietmar, 2003. "German FDI and Integration of Production in the EU," Discussion Paper Series 26376, Hamburg Institute of International Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:8:p:753-767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.