IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recgxx/v74y1998i2p111-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking on the CosmoCorps? Experiments in Transnational Labor Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Jane Wills

Abstract

This paper revisits the argument that globalization necessarily undermines trade union organization. In addition to heightened competition for investment and the threat of social dumping, the internationalization of capital can also bring workers into closer contact with each other. Working class nationalism and internationalism are both possible outcomes of economic globalization. By exploring the history of labor internationalism and the current development of European Works Councils (EWCs), this paper urges caution in assuming that globalization necessarily threatens labor organization. Contemporary experience suggests that, in some instances, the changing world economy poses new opportunities for workers to organize across national boundaries. I draw on preliminary research into the development of EWCs in the United Kingdom to suggest that they offer real opportunities for new forms of labor internationalism, and as such, EWCs are emblematic of the possibilities and problems facing workers as they seek to organize in a globalizing world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jane Wills, 1998. "Taking on the CosmoCorps? Experiments in Transnational Labor Organization," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(2), pages 111-130, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recgxx:v:74:y:1998:i:2:p:111-130
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00108.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00108.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1944-8287.1998.tb00108.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ernesto Noronha & Premilla D’Cruz & Muneeb Ul Lateef Banday, 2020. "Navigating Embeddedness: Experiences of Indian IT Suppliers and Employees in the Netherlands," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 95-113, June.
    2. Korkmaz, Emre Eren, 2013. "Globalisation, the global labour movement and transnational solidarity campaigns: three case studies from Turkey," SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(1), pages 97-112.
    3. Katy Fox-Hodess, 2020. "Building Labour Internationalism ‘from Below’: Lessons from the International Dockworkers Council’s European Working Group," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(1), pages 91-108, February.
    4. Trina Hamilton, 2009. "Power in Numbers: A Call for Analytical Generosity toward New Political Strategies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(2), pages 284-301, February.
    5. Lydia Savage, 2004. "Public Sector Unions Shaping Hospital Privatization: The Creation of Boston Medical Center," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(3), pages 547-568, March.
    6. Katy Fox-Hodess, 2017. "(Re-)Locating the Local and National in the Global: Multi-Scalar Political Alignment in Transnational European Dockworker Union Campaigns," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 55(3), pages 626-647, September.
    7. David Peetz & Georgina Murray & Olav Muurlink & Maggie May, 2015. "The meaning and making of union delegate networks," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 26(4), pages 596-613, December.
    8. Evans, Peter, 2010. "Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize? Twenty-first Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt10j002st, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    9. David Goss & Janet Druker & Tim Strangleman & Kevin Ward & Helen Russell & Mark Erickson, 2002. "Book Reviews," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(4), pages 761-773, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recgxx:v:74:y:1998:i:2:p:111-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.