IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v104y2014i3p432-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is There Really a “Wrong Side of the Tracks”in Urban Areas and Does It Matter for Spatial Analysis?

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Mitchell
  • Duncan Lee

Abstract

Sharp socioeconomic differences between adjacent neighborhoods run counter to Tobler's first law (TFL) of geography and call into question the blanket application of smoothing techniques designed to handle spatial autocorrelation. In a recent project, large socioeconomic differences between adjacent neighborhoods were observed coinciding with physical features at the neighborhood boundary such as rivers, parks, railroads, and highways. Literature on urban form suggests mechanisms by which these features might create or maintain socioeconomic differences. We therefore test whether the presence of physical features on neighborhood boundaries is associated with greater socioeconomic disparity between the neighborhoods and whether the types of features less easily crossed are more strongly associated. The study area was the city of Glasgow, Scotland. We used vector data to determine which of N = 1,914 neighborhood boundaries coincided with physical features, a well-validated measure of multiple deprivation to assess differences in socioeconomic character across these boundaries, and linear regression to assess associations. The presence of physical features was weakly associated with greater socioeconomic difference across neighborhood boundaries (B = 0.193, p = 0.006). Water (rivers/canals; B = 0.378, p = 0.005) and open spaces (B = 0.283, p = 0.016) were most strongly associated. The presence of physical features, however, was neither necessary nor sufficient for large interneighborhood differences in socioeconomic character. We thus confirm that TFL is not infallible and suggest that spatial analysts need to be concerned about the blanket application of spatial smoothing. Physical features do not hold influence of sufficient size or consistency to guide when and when not to smooth values in spatial analysis, however.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Mitchell & Duncan Lee, 2014. "Is There Really a “Wrong Side of the Tracks”in Urban Areas and Does It Matter for Spatial Analysis?," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(3), pages 432-443, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:104:y:2014:i:3:p:432-443
    DOI: 10.1080/00045608.2014.892321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00045608.2014.892321
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00045608.2014.892321?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rory Kramer, 2018. "Testing the role of barriers in shaping segregation profiles: The importance of visualizing the local neighborhood," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1106-1121, November.
    2. Laís de Andrade Cristo & Marco Aurélio Santos & Valente José Matlaba, 2022. "Land-Use Changes and Socioeconomic Conditions of Communities along the Carajás Railroad in Eastern Amazonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Mindell, Jennifer S. & Anciaes, Paulo R. & Dhanani, Ashley & Stockton, Jemima & Jones, Peter & Haklay, Muki & Groce, Nora & Scholes, Shaun & Vaughan, Laura, 2017. "Using triangulation to assess a suite of tools to measure community severance," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 119-129.
    4. Scott W. Hegerty, 2021. "Do City Borders Constrain Ethnic Diversity?," Papers 2105.06017, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:104:y:2014:i:3:p:432-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.