IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v14y2014i1p111-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do affine jump-diffusion models require global calibration? Empirical studies from option markets

Author

Listed:
  • Seungho Yang
  • Jaewook Lee

Abstract

This study presents an empirical evaluation of the efficiency and robustness of calibration methods for option pricing models with closed-form expression, specifically by using affine jump-diffusion models. To mitigate the local minima problems inherent in model calibration, we provide a global calibration method with enhanced discrete local search strategy. We compare this global calibration method with local calibration methods by using both model generated and real-market cross-sectional option data. Global calibration is highly essential for obtaining a reliable parameter set for affine jump-diffusion models and yields robust calibration results. By using the 2007 S&P 500 index options, we apply the global calibration method to 12 widely used affine jump-diffusion models. Results show that the calibrated parameters common across the models share similar values. This result verifies the robustness of global calibration. Conversely, local calibration generates different values. We also examine the predictive performance of the models and find that global calibration outperforms local calibration for the considered affine jump-diffusion models with respect to in-sample and out-of-sample errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungho Yang & Jaewook Lee, 2014. "Do affine jump-diffusion models require global calibration? Empirical studies from option markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 111-123, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:111-123
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2013.825048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2013.825048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2013.825048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rama Cont & Jose da Fonseca, 2002. "Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 45-60.
    2. Sol Kim, 2009. "The performance of traders' rules in options market," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(11), pages 999-1020, November.
    3. Bakshi, Gurdip & Cao, Charles & Chen, Zhiwu, 1997. "Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(5), pages 2003-2049, December.
    4. Minenna, Marcello & Verzella, Paolo, 2008. "A revisited and stable Fourier transform method for affine jump diffusion models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2064-2075, October.
    5. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    6. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:2059-2106 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. P. Balland, 2002. "Deterministic implied volatility models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 31-44.
    8. Lorella Fatone & Francesca Mariani & Maria Cristina Recchioni & Francesco Zirilli, 2009. "An explicitly solvable multi‐scale stochastic volatility model: Option pricing and calibration problems," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(9), pages 862-893, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fengler, Matthias R. & Härdle, Wolfgang & Mammen, Enno, 2003. "Implied volatility string dynamics," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2003,54, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    2. Fengler, Matthias R. & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Mammen, Enno, 2005. "A dynamic semiparametric factor model for implied volatility string dynamics," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2005-020, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    3. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Li, Chenxu & Li, Chen Xu, 2021. "Closed-form implied volatility surfaces for stochastic volatility models with jumps," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 364-392.
    4. Henri Bertholon & Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro, 2006. "Pricing and Inference with Mixtures of Conditionally Normal Processes," Working Papers 2006-28, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    5. Jianhui Li & Sebastian A. Gehricke & Jin E. Zhang, 2019. "How do US options traders “smirk” on China? Evidence from FXI options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(11), pages 1450-1470, November.
    6. Manfred Gilli & Enrico Schumann, 2012. "Heuristic optimisation in financial modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 129-158, March.
    7. Jin Zhang & Yi Xiang, 2008. "The implied volatility smirk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 263-284.
    8. Chen, Si & Zhou, Zhen & Li, Shenghong, 2016. "An efficient estimate and forecast of the implied volatility surface: A nonlinear Kalman filter approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 655-664.
    9. Nappo, Giovanna & Marchetti, Fabio Massimo & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2023. "Traders’ heterogeneous beliefs about stock volatility and the implied volatility skew in financial options markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2005-020 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Toby Daglish & John Hull & Wulin Suo, 2007. "Volatility surfaces: theory, rules of thumb, and empirical evidence," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(5), pages 507-524.
    12. Pascal François & Rémi Galarneau‐Vincent & Geneviève Gauthier & Frédéric Godin, 2022. "Venturing into uncharted territory: An extensible implied volatility surface model," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(10), pages 1912-1940, October.
    13. Jan Maruhn & Morten Nalholm & Matthias Fengler, 2011. "Static hedges for reverse barrier options with robustness against skew risk: an empirical analysis," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(5), pages 711-727.
    14. Stephane Crepey, 2004. "Delta-hedging vega risk?," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(5), pages 559-579.
    15. Bas Peeters, 2012. "Risk premiums in a simple market model for implied volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 739-748, January.
    16. Alexey MEDVEDEV & Olivier SCAILLET, 2004. "A Simple Calibration Procedure of Stochastic Volatility Models with Jumps by Short Term Asymptotics," FAME Research Paper Series rp93, International Center for Financial Asset Management and Engineering.
    17. Frédéric Abergel & Riadh Zaatour, 2012. "What drives option prices ?," Post-Print hal-00687675, HAL.
    18. Connor J.A. Stuart & Sebastian A. Gehricke & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan, 2021. "Implied volatility smirk in the Australian dollar market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4573-4599, September.
    19. F. Leung & M. Law & S. K. Djeng, 2024. "Deterministic modelling of implied volatility in cryptocurrency options with underlying multiple resolution momentum indicator and non-linear machine learning regression algorithm," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Johannes Ruf & Weiguan Wang, 2020. "Hedging with Linear Regressions and Neural Networks," Papers 2004.08891, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    21. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00687675 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Alok Dixit & Shivam Singh, 2018. "Ad-Hoc Black–Scholes vis-à-vis TSRV-based Black–Scholes: Evidence from Indian Options Market," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 16(1), pages 57-88, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:14:y:2014:i:1:p:111-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.