IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v32y2012i3p177-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary change? An evaluation of the McNulty report on rail

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Jupe

Abstract

This article examines a major UK value-for-money study by Sir Roy McNulty in the context of the neoliberal public policy environment. This environment favoured rail's privatization, and subsequent reform attempts, which maintained the privatization model, have done little to address rail's fundamental problems. McNulty's proposals are examined in terms of their likely effects on the infrastructure authority and the train companies. The article concludes that, although McNulty correctly identified fragmentation as a key cause of rail's cost escalation, and noted the less fragmented nature of other European railways, its neoliberal focus meant that it missed the opportunity to reverse the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Jupe, 2012. "Evolutionary change? An evaluation of the McNulty report on rail," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 177-184, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:32:y:2012:i:3:p:177-184
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2012.676274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2012.676274
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2012.676274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gourvish, Terry, 2002. "British Rail 1974-1997: From Integration to Privatisation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199250059.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haines-Doran, Tom, 2022. "Critical accounting scholarship and social movements: The case of rail privatisation in Britain," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. McCartney, S. & Stittle, J., 2017. "‘A Very Costly Industry’: The cost of Britain’s privatised railway," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Russ Haywood, 2003. "Evaluation of the policies in British local transport plans with regard to the promotion of rail freight," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 387-412, July.
    2. Elisabetta Iossa & Patrick Rey & Michael Waterson, 2022. "Organising Competition for the Market," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 822-868.
    3. Dawson, David & Shaw, Jon & Roland Gehrels, W., 2016. "Sea-level rise impacts on transport infrastructure: The notorious case of the coastal railway line at Dawlish, England," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 97-109.
    4. Jupe, Robert & Funnell, Warwick, 2015. "Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain's rail industry," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 65-85.
    5. José A. Gómez-Ibáñez, 2016. "Open Access to Infrastructure Networks: The Experience of Railroads," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(2), pages 311-345, September.
    6. David Tyrrall, 2004. "The Uk Railway Privatisation : Failing To Succeed?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 32-38, September.
    7. David Parker, 2013. "The privatized railways: problems foreseen," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 313-319, September.
    8. Jean Shaoul, 2006. "Leasing Passenger Trains: The British Experience," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 189-212, July.
    9. Anguera, Ricard, 2006. "The Channel Tunnel--an ex post economic evaluation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 291-315, May.
    10. Preston, John & Robins, Dawn, 2013. "Evaluating the long term impacts of transport policy: The case of passenger rail privatisation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 14-20.
    11. McCartney, S. & Stittle, J., 2017. "‘A Very Costly Industry’: The cost of Britain’s privatised railway," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-17.
    12. Preston, John, 2023. "All things must pass? Recent changes to competition and ownership in public transport in Great Britain," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Bowman, Andrew, 2015. "An illusion of success: The consequences of British rail privatisation," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 51-63.
    14. Preston, John, 2008. "A review of passenger rail franchising in Britain: 1996/1997-2006/2007," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 71-77, January.
    15. Robert Jupe, 2010. "A model or a policy muddle? An evaluation of rail franchising in the UK," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 347-354, November.
    16. Jupe, Robert, 2009. "A “fresh start” or the “worst of all worlds”? A critical financial analysis of the performance and regulation of Network Rail in Britain’s privatised railway system," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 175-204.
    17. Yvrande-Billon, Anne & Menard, Claude, 2005. "Institutional constraints and organizational changes: the case of the British rail reform," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 675-699, April.
    18. Fabrice Hamelin & Vincent Spenlehauer, 2014. "Managing to Reinvent Strong Publicness in a Privatized World," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 419-438, September.
    19. Richard Wellings, 2014. "The Privatisation of the UK Railway Industry: An Experiment in Railway Structure," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 255-266, June.
    20. Allan Woodburn, 2006. "Evaluation of Rail Freight Facilities Grant Funding in Britain," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 311-326, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:32:y:2012:i:3:p:177-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.