IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v29y2009i3p161-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Payment by Results’ in the English NHS: the continuing challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Allen

Abstract

The article discusses the objectives of the prospective payment system—‘Payment by Results’ (PbR)—being introduced into the English National Health Service and how it fits into the broader reform programme of health services in England. The continuing challenges for PbR are discussed and some suggestions made about how matters could be improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Allen, 2009. "‘Payment by Results’ in the English NHS: the continuing challenges," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 161-166, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:161-166
    DOI: 10.1080/09540960902891681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540960902891681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540960902891681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Street, 2004. "Activity Based Funding for Hospitals: English Policy, International Experience," Monograph 000487, Office of Health Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehmet Gok & Erkut Altındağ, 2015. "Analysis of the cost and efficiency relationship: experience in the Turkish pay for performance system," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(5), pages 459-469, June.
    2. Pauline Allen & Christina Petsoulas, 2016. "Pricing in the English NHS quasi market: a national study of the allocation of financial risk through contracts," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 341-348, July.
    3. Garcia-Lacalle, Javier & Martin, Emilio, 2010. "Rural vs urban hospital performance in a 'competitive' public health service," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1131-1140, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Epstein & Anne Mason, 2006. "Costs and prices for inpatient care in England: Mirror twins or distant cousins?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 233-242, August.
    2. Office of Health Economics, 2009. "How Fair? Competition between Independent and NHS Providers to Supply Non-Emergency Hospital Care to NHS Patients in England," Briefing 000230, Office of Health Economics.
    3. Jonathan Sussex & Shelley Farrar, 2009. "Activity-based funding for National Health Service hospitals in England: managers’ experience and expectations," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(2), pages 197-206, May.
    4. Andrew Street & Kirsi Vitikainen & Afsaneh Bjorvatn & Anne Hvenegaard, 2007. "Introducing activity-based financing: a review of experience in Australia, Denmark, Norway and Sweden," Working Papers 030cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    5. Pauline Allen & Christina Petsoulas, 2016. "Pricing in the English NHS quasi market: a national study of the allocation of financial risk through contracts," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 341-348, July.
    6. McPake, Barbara & Hanson, Kara & Adam, Christopher, 2007. "Two-tier charging strategies in public hospitals: Implications for intra-hospital resource allocation and equity of access to hospital services," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 447-462, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:29:y:2009:i:3:p:161-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.