IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmgr/v15y2013i5p687-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Allocation in Higher Education in The Context of New Public Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sadri Tahar
  • Roman Boutellier

Abstract

The public administration framework New Public Management (NPM) has been applied to higher education systems in many western countries. The literature on these reforms reports on some positive effects but many critical voices can also be found. Even though NPM as a narrative unifies principles and measures under one roof, a detailed analysis shows that NPM principles fit differently for different tasks. Using a contingency approach, we show that, within the NPM narrative, two different higher education funding approaches exist, namely high-tech versus high-touch. Our study confirms the theoretical proposition that high-touch approaches match better with higher education domains. The use of contingency theory to classify NPM measures thus might be a promising way to further advance NPM theory and its practical application to topics as controversial as academic funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadri Tahar & Roman Boutellier, 2013. "Resource Allocation in Higher Education in The Context of New Public Management," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 687-711, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:15:y:2013:i:5:p:687-711
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.707680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2012.707680
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2012.707680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berlemann, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2015. "Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1108-1115.
    2. Górska Anna & Pikos Anna & Dobija Dorota & Grossi Giuseppe, 2022. "Autonomy Without Accountability in Resource Allocation Reforms: Blending Old and New Logic in Universities," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(1), pages 43-82, June.
    3. Ulrike Schmidt & Thomas Günther, 2016. "Public sector accounting research in the higher education sector: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 235-265, December.
    4. Górska Anna & Pikos Anna & Dobija Dorota & Grossi Giuseppe, 2022. "Autonomy Without Accountability in Resource Allocation Reforms: Blending Old and New Logic in Universities," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 43-82, June.
    5. Piotr Pietrzak, 2018. "Uniwersytet przedsiębiorczy – moda czy konieczność?," Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania. Modern Management Systems, Military University of Technology, Faculty of Security, Logistics and Management, Institute of Organization and Management, issue 2, pages 131-142.
    6. Wadim Strielkowski & Vyacheslav Volchik & Artyom Maskaev & Pavel Savko, 2020. "Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmgr:v:15:y:2013:i:5:p:687-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPXM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.