IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v25y1998i4p335-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling short-term marine transport of bulk products

Author

Listed:
  • Dan O. Bausch
  • Gerald G. Brown
  • David Ronen

Abstract

A multinational company uses a personal computer to schedule a fleet of coastal tankers and barges transporting liquid bulk products among plants, distribution centres (tank farms), and industrial customers. A simple spreadsheet interface cloaks a sophisticated optimization-based decision support system and makes this system useable via a varity of natural languages. The dispatchers, whose native language is not English, and some of whom presumably speak no English at all, communicate via the spreadsheet, and view recommended schedules displayed in Gantt charts both internationally familiar tools. Inside the spreadsheet, a highly detailed simulation can generate every feasible alternate vessel employment schedule, and an integer linear set partitioning model selects one schedule for each vessel so that all loads and deliveries are completed at minimal cost while satisfying all operational requirements. The optimized fleet employment schedule is displyed graphically with hourly time resolution over a planning horizon of 2-3 weeks. Each vessel will customarily make several voyages and many port calls to load and unload products during this time.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan O. Bausch & Gerald G. Brown & David Ronen, 1998. "Scheduling short-term marine transport of bulk products," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 335-348, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:25:y:1998:i:4:p:335-348
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839800000057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839800000057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839800000057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald G. Brown & Clark E. Goodman & R. Kevin Wood, 1990. "Annual Scheduling of Atlantic Fleet Naval Combatants," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 249-259, April.
    2. Gerald G. Brown & Kelly J. Cormican & Siriphong Lawphongpanich & Daniel B. Widdis, 1997. "Optimizing submarine berthing with a persistence incentive," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 301-318, June.
    3. Ronen, David, 1993. "Ship scheduling: The last decade," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 325-333, December.
    4. Gerald G. Brown & Siriphong Lawphongpanich & Katie Podolak Thurman, 1994. "Optimizing ship berthing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    2. Marielle Christiansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & David Ronen, 2004. "Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Gerald G. Brown & Walter C. DeGrange & Wilson L. Price & Anton A. Rowe, 2017. "Scheduling combat logistics force replenishments at sea for the US Navy," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(8), pages 677-693, December.
    4. Michael R. Miller & Robert J. Alexander & Vincent A. Arbige & Robert F. Dell & Steven R. Kremer & Brian P. McClune & Jane E. Oppenlander & Joshua P. Tomlin, 2017. "Optimal Allocation of Students to Naval Nuclear-Power Training Units," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 320-335, August.
    5. Elin Halvorsen-Weare & Kjetil Fagerholt, 2013. "Routing and scheduling in a liquefied natural gas shipping problem with inventory and berth constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 167-186, March.
    6. Ricardo Gatica & Pablo Miranda, 2011. "Special Issue on Latin-American Research: A Time Based Discretization Approach for Ship Routing and Scheduling with Variable Speed," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 465-485, September.
    7. Ryuichi Shibasaki & Takayuki Iijima & Taiji Kawakami & Takashi Kadono & Tatsuyuki Shishido, 2017. "Network assignment model of integrating maritime and hinterland container shipping: application to Central America," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(2), pages 234-273, June.
    8. Zheng, Jianfeng & Yang, Dong, 2016. "Hub-and-spoke network design for container shipping along the Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 51-57.
    9. Wang, Hua & Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2014. "Simultaneous optimization of schedule coordination and cargo allocation for liner container shipping networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 261-273.
    10. Jasmine Lam, 2010. "An integrated approach for port selection, ship scheduling and financial analysis," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 33-46, April.
    11. Fagerholt, Kjetil, 2001. "Ship scheduling with soft time windows: An optimisation based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 559-571, June.
    12. Hamed Hasheminia & Changmin Jiang, 2017. "Strategic trade-off between vessel delay and schedule recovery: an empirical analysis of container liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 458-473, May.
    13. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Will liner ships make fewer port calls per route?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-04, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    14. Ya Xu & Qiushuang Chen & Xiongwen Quan, 2012. "Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 123-140, January.
    15. Sebastian Ruther & Natashia Boland & Faramroze G. Engineer & Ian Evans, 2017. "Integrated Aircraft Routing, Crew Pairing, and Tail Assignment: Branch-and-Price with Many Pricing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 177-195, February.
    16. Sun, Qinghe & Meng, Qiang & Chou, Mabel C., 2021. "Optimizing voyage charterparty (VCP) arrangement: Laytime negotiation and operations coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 263-270.
    17. Kjetil Fagerholt *, 2004. "Designing optimal routes in a liner shipping problem," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 259-268, October.
    18. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Pache, Hannah & Kastner, Marvin & Jahn, Carlos, 2019. "Current state and trends in tramp ship routing and scheduling," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 369-394, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    20. Zhen, Lu & Wu, Yiwei & Wang, Shuaian & Laporte, Gilbert, 2020. "Green technology adoption for fleet deployment in a shipping network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 388-410.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:25:y:1998:i:4:p:335-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.