IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jriskr/v19y2016i3p305-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision criteria for updating test intervals for well barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza M. Gelyani
  • Jon Tømmerås Selvik
  • Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss whether or not the decision-making process regarding test intervals for well barriers should adopt the same decision criteria as those recently suggested for safety instrumented systems (SIS). We conclude that the criterion suggested for halving the test intervals for SIS is also appropriate to use for well barriers. The criterion for doubling the test interval for SIS is, however, not considered appropriate, as it does not give sufficient weight to the uncertainties. A new type of criterion for doubling the test interval for well barriers that better reflects the uncertainties is suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza M. Gelyani & Jon Tømmerås Selvik & Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen, 2016. "Decision criteria for updating test intervals for well barriers," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 305-315, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:305-315
    DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2014.961521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13669877.2014.961521
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13669877.2014.961521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Erik Vinnem, 2007. "Offshore Risk Assessment," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-84628-717-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scarlett, Lynn & Linkov, Igor & Kousky, Carolyn, 2011. "Risk Management Practices: Cross-Agency Comparisons with Minerals Management Service," RFF Working Paper Series dp-10-67, Resources for the Future.
    2. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2018. "Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 160-165.
    3. Zhong, Shengtong & Langseth, Helge & Nielsen, Thomas Dyhre, 2014. "A classification-based approach to monitoring the safety of dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 61-71.
    4. Aven, Terje, 2008. "A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(6), pages 790-797.
    5. J Montewka & P Krata & F Goerlandt & A Mazaheri & P Kujala, 2011. "Marine traffic risk modelling – an innovative approach and a case study," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(3), pages 307-322, September.
    6. E B Abrahamsen & T Aven & R S Iversen, 2010. "Integrated framework for safety management and uncertainty management," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(2), pages 97-103, June.
    7. Birnur Özbaş & İlhan Or & Tayfur Altıok, 2013. "Comprehensive scenario analysis for mitigation of risks of the maritime traffic in the Strait of Istanbul," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 541-561, May.
    8. Aven, Terje & Hiriart, Yolande, 2011. "The use of a basic safety investment model in a practical risk management context," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1421-1425.
    9. Dai, Lijuan & Ehlers, Sören & Rausand, Marvin & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer, 2013. "Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 18-31.
    10. Maryam Tabibzadeh & Najmedin Meshkati, 2014. "Learning from the BP Deepwater Horizon accident: risk analysis of human and organizational factors in negative pressure test," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 194-207, June.
    11. Skogdalen, Jon Espen & Vinnem, Jan Erik, 2012. "Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 48-58.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jriskr:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:305-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJRR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.