IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jmkthe/v9y1998i1p53-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

University Image: The Benefits of Assessment and Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • R. Eric Landrum
  • Rob Turrisi
  • Clayton Harless

Abstract

Residents across a state were asked about their opinions about a regional university. Using closed- and open-ended questions in mailed surveys, information about university image was collected. Results indicate that residents have one of two opinions about the university—either they have a general, positive opinion (halo effect) or no opinion. LISREL modeling of the data point to the significant components of university image and how they influence the decision to send a son or daughter to the university, which in turn leads to a better understanding of the impact of university image. More work with varying populations and a variety of universities needs to be published to contribute to a general, overall understanding of the impact of university image.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Eric Landrum & Rob Turrisi & Clayton Harless, 1998. "University Image: The Benefits of Assessment and Modeling," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 53-68, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:9:y:1998:i:1:p:53-68
    DOI: 10.1300/J050v09n01_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1300/J050v09n01_05
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1300/J050v09n01_05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shakeel Ahmed & Muhammad Hasnain Ali, 2022. "Institutional Service Quality, Word of Mouth and Institutional Image: An Empirical Study of Pakistani Universities," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(1), pages 18-30, March.
    2. Ramón Álvarez Vaz & Danny Freira & Elena Vernazza & Helena Alves, 2016. "Can students’ satisfaction indexes be applied the same way in different countries?," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 13(2), pages 101-118, July.
    3. Nguyen, Bang & Yu, Xiaoyu & Melewar, T.C. & Hemsley-Brown, Jane, 2016. "Brand ambidexterity and commitment in higher education: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3105-3112.
    4. Marta Retamosa & Ángel Millán & Miguel Moital, 2020. "Does the Type of Degree Predict Different Levels of Satisfaction and Loyalty? A Brand Equity Perspective," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 57-77, May.
    5. Partenie Cristina-Veronica, 2019. "From Intent to Action – A Study Regarding High School Students’ Motivation in Choosing a University," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 29(2), pages 17-32, June.
    6. Luis Doña-Toledo & Teodoro Luque-Martínez & Salvador Barrio-García, 2017. "Antecedents and consequences of university perceived value, according to graduates: The moderating role of Higher Education involvement," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(4), pages 535-565, December.
    7. Hutchinson, Michael & Bennett, Gregg, 2012. "Core values brand building in sport: Stakeholder attitudes towards intercollegiate athletics and university brand congruency," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 434-447.
    8. Lucio Masserini & Matilde Bini & Monica Pratesi, 2019. "Do Quality of Services and Institutional Image Impact Students’ Satisfaction and Loyalty in Higher Education?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 91-115, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jmkthe:v:9:y:1998:i:1:p:53-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/WMHE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.