IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v51y2008i4p477-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: lessons from five watersheds

Author

Listed:
  • Stacy Rosenberg
  • Richard Margerum

Abstract

Collaborative watershed management initiatives have increased tremendously over the past decade. One of the critical questions for these initiatives is how to influence private land management practices to improve watershed health. This article researches landowner motivations and preferences for watershed restoration efforts in five watersheds in Western Oregon. Based on a survey of 446 landowners and 80 personal interviews, the research revealed that landowner perspectives vary by socio-economic, cultural, and land use characteristics. They are strongly motivated by a concern for future generations and interpersonal influence is particularly important. Finances, time, and unfamiliarity were all significant barriers to the adoption of conservation practices. The findings also revealed considerable variation among landowners as to their trusted sources of information and preferred outreach methods. Beyond the findings in Oregon, the research suggests that watershed initiatives need to understand landowner characteristics and motivating factors to better promote watershed restoration and target outreach efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacy Rosenberg & Richard Margerum, 2008. "Landowner motivations for watershed restoration: lessons from five watersheds," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 477-496.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:51:y:2008:i:4:p:477-496
    DOI: 10.1080/09640560802116962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560802116962
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640560802116962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    2. Shorna Allred & Gretchen Gary, 2019. "Riparian landowner decision-making in the context of flooding: an application of the theory of planned behavior," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 396-408, December.
    3. Abdollahzadeh, Gholamhossein & Azadi, Hossein & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Sharif & Jahangir, Leila & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Tan, Rong & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Landholders’ perception of conversion of steep lands to orchard schemes: Land use policy implications in North Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Casola, William R. & Peterson, M. Nils & Pacifici, Krishna & Sills, Erin O. & Moorman, Christopher E., 2023. "Conservation motivations and willingness to pay for wildlife management areas among recreational user groups," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Leonie Hodel & Yann Polain de Waroux & Rachael D. Garrett, 2024. "Characterizing culture’s influence in land systems," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 973-982, August.
    6. Sarah P. Church & Michael Dunn & Nicholas Babin & Amber Saylor Mase & Tonya Haigh & Linda S. Prokopy, 2018. "Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern U.S. Ag advisors’ views on drought, climate change, and risk management," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(2), pages 349-365, June.
    7. Gloria Lentijo & Mark Hostetler, 2013. "Effects of a participatory bird census project on knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of coffee farmers in Colombia," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 199-223, February.
    8. Traxler, Emilia & Li, Tongzhe, 2020. "Agricultural Best Management Practices, A summary of adoption behaviour," Working Papers 305271, University of Guelph, Institute for the Advanced Study of Food and Agricultural Policy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:51:y:2008:i:4:p:477-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.