IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jeduce/v39y2008i4p342-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doing Economics: Enhancing Skills through a Process-Oriented Senior Research Course

Author

Listed:
  • KimMarie McGoldrick

Abstract

The author describes a senior-level course designed to promote student skills in "acting like economists." Although most departments offer senior-level courses, this one is unique in that it was developed on the basis of learning as opposed to content objectives, assignments are designed to reinforce and further develop research skills through a project of the student's choosing, and it more closely models what it means to "act like an economist" (W. L. Hansen 2006). The author discusses the development of this course and its unique features, the research process followed by students and the outcomes generated, and some of the advantages and disadvantages associated with this form of senior research course.

Suggested Citation

  • KimMarie McGoldrick, 2008. "Doing Economics: Enhancing Skills through a Process-Oriented Senior Research Course," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 342-356, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:39:y:2008:i:4:p:342-356
    DOI: 10.3200/JECE.39.4.342-356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3200/JECE.39.4.342-356
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3200/JECE.39.4.342-356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. W. Lee Hansen, 2011. "An Expected Proficiencies Approach to the Economics Major," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Christopher C. Klein, 2013. "Econometrics as a Capstone Course in Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 268-276, September.
    3. Ishuan Li & Robert Simonson, 2016. "Capstone senior research course in economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 161-167, April.
    4. Allison Shwachman Kaminaga & Aziz N. Berdiev & Laura Beaudin, 2024. "Using the Fed Challenge to Enrich the Teaching of a Money and Banking Class," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(2), pages 213-234, April.
    5. Prakarsh Singh & Hongye Guo & Alvaro Morales, 2015. "A Research-Based Development Economics Course for Undergraduates," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 274-284, July.
    6. Juan Luis Jiménez & Jordi Perdiguero & Ancor Suárez, 2011. "Debating as a classroom tool for adapting learning outcomes to the European higher education area," IREA Working Papers 201109, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jun 2011.
    7. Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick, 2017. "Promoting Undergraduate Research in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 655-659, May.
    8. Jason E. Dowd & Michelle P. Connolly & Robert J. Thompson & Julie A. Reynolds, 2015. "Improved Reasoning in Undergraduate Writing through Structured Workshops," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 14-27, March.
    9. Li, Ishuan & Simonson, Robert D., 2016. "The value of a redesigned program and capstone course in economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 48-58.
    10. Katherine Schmeiser, 2017. "Teaching writing in economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 254-264, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:39:y:2008:i:4:p:342-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/VECE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.