IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v2y2010i3p289-309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalisation of government evaluation: balancing trade-offs

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Gaarder
  • Bertha Briceno

Abstract

Carefully designed and implemented evaluations can improve people's welfare and enhance development effectiveness. This paper investigates institutions in Mexico, Chile, and Colombia, and shows that for the successful inception of an institutionalised system for evaluation, three common factors stand out: the existence of a democratic system with a vocal opposition, the existence of influential monitoring and evaluation (M&E) champions to lead the process, and a clear powerful stakeholder. Mexico's CONEVAL is the most independent of the three bodies, mainly due to the fact that it is reporting to an executive board of independent academics; Chile's Dipres is the best placed in terms of enforcement, with its location within the Ministry of Finance and control of an independent budget; and Colombia's SINERGIA helps promote a culture of utilisation of evaluations as a project management tool. However, actual usage of M&E information and the resulting effect upon development effectiveness are the benchmarks of success. The paper concludes that an explicit and thoughtful process of assessing the needs, the focus, and the emphasis of the system should serve officials and champions to identify adequate arrangements for the particular country context and understand how to better respond to the forces pushing for the creation of new M&E units and bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Gaarder & Bertha Briceno, 2010. "Institutionalisation of government evaluation: balancing trade-offs," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 289-309.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:289-309
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2010.505027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19439342.2010.505027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2010.505027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith Mackay, 2007. "How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6851.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gaarder, Marie M. & Bartsch, Ulrich, 2014. "The second wave of independence : shopping for solutions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7069, The World Bank.
    2. Chirau, Takunda J. & Blaser-Mapitsa, Caitlin, 2020. "How performance management regulations shape evaluation practice in South African municipalities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aiwanehi Barbara Ofuani & Abdul-Hameed Adeola Sulaimon & Sunday Abayomi Adebisi, 2018. "Corporate Governance Practices: A Comparative Study of Selected Public Corporations in Nigeria," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(1), pages 192-202, March.
    2. Charles Ikutwa & Elijah Siringi & Geofrey Magani, 2019. "Enhancing Food Security Through Result-Oriented Policies in Kenya’s Drylands: A Case of Kikumbulyu North Ward, Makueni County," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 3(11), pages 23-29, November.
    3. World Bank, 2010. "Republic of Yemen Education Status Report : Challenges and Opportunities," World Bank Publications - Reports 18516, The World Bank Group.
    4. World Bank, 2009. "Mexico - Analysis of the Information, Monitoring, and Evaluation Guidelines of the Programs in the Public Federal Administration," World Bank Publications - Reports 3098, The World Bank Group.
    5. Geoffrey Shepherd, 2011. "Conducting Diagnoses of M&E Systems and Capacities," World Bank Publications - Reports 11054, The World Bank Group.
    6. Margaret Grosh & Carlo del Ninno & Emil Tesliuc & Azedine Ouerghi, 2008. "For Protection and Promotion : The Design and Implementation of Effective Safety Nets," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6582.
    7. K K Govender & N.Z Hlatshwayo, 2015. "Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in South Africa," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 91-99.
    8. Ariel Fiszbein & Norbert Schady & Francisco H.G. Ferreira & Margaret Grosh & Niall Keleher & Pedro Olinto & Emmanuel Skoufias, 2009. "Conditional Cash Transfers : Reducing Present and Future Poverty," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2597.
    9. Holvoet, Nathalie & Inberg, Liesbeth & Sekirime, Susan, 2013. "Institutional analysis of monitoring and evaluation systems : comparing M&E systems in Ugandas health and education sector," IOB Working Papers 2013.03, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    10. Sergii Slukhai, 2011. "M&E and Budget Program Performance Measurement in Ukraine: Current State and Needs for Improvement," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(2), pages 28-47.
    11. Marco Kools & Virginia E. Vitiello, 2010. "Good Governance of Early Childhood Development Programmes in Developing Countries: The need for a comprehensive monitoring system," Papers indipa597, Innocenti Discussion Papers.
    12. Gaarder, Marie & Briceno, Bertha, 2011. "Institutionalisation of government evaluation: Balancing trade offs," 3ie Publications 2010-8, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
    13. Daniel Nigohosyan & Albena Vutsova, 2018. "The 2014–2020 European Regional Development Fund Indicators: The Incomplete Evolution," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 559-577, June.
    14. Elisabeth King & Cyrus Samii & Birte Snilstveit, 2010. "Interventions to promote social cohesion in sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 336-370.
    15. Sergii SLukhai, 2011. "Monitoring and evaluation as tools for enhancing public expenditure management in Ukraine," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 35(2), pages 217-239.
    16. Chen, Huey T. & Morosanu, Liliana & Powell-Threets, Kia & Lian, Brad & Turner, Nannette, 2019. "Assessment of the monitoring and evaluation system of a population-based program: Theory-driven evaluation approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Decentralization in Client Countries : An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 1990-2007," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6543.
    18. Keith Mackay, 2010. "Conceptual Framework for Monitoring and Evaluation," World Bank Publications - Reports 11080, The World Bank Group.
    19. Michael Bamberger, 2009. "Strengthening the evaluation of programme effectiveness through reconstructing baseline data," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 37-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:2:y:2010:i:3:p:289-309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.