IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v82y2020ics014971892030135x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How performance management regulations shape evaluation practice in South African municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Chirau, Takunda J.
  • Blaser-Mapitsa, Caitlin

Abstract

South African municipalities are taking hesitant steps towards institutionalising evaluation practice. This paper explores how evaluation is being institutionalised at a municipal level, looking at both the legislative and regulatory requirements in terms of planning, budgeting, and reporting, as well as opportunities for evaluative practice. A well-established performance management system, coupled with certain constraints to innovation and building an evaluative culture are contributing to the creation of an evaluation function that serves a monitoring purpose. A combination of desktop research and participatory action research was used to understand the municipal practice of evaluation. The results have implications for how decentralised public sector evaluation systems are understood.

Suggested Citation

  • Chirau, Takunda J. & Blaser-Mapitsa, Caitlin, 2020. "How performance management regulations shape evaluation practice in South African municipalities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:82:y:2020:i:c:s014971892030135x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892030135X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronette Engela & Tania Ajam, 2010. "Implementing a Government-wide Monitoring and Evaluation System in South Africa," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 27574.
    2. Marie Gaarder & Bertha Briceno, 2010. "Institutionalisation of government evaluation: balancing trade-offs," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 289-309.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Urquía-Grande, Elena & Lorain, Marie-Anne & Rautiainen, Antti Ilmari & Cano-Montero, Elisa Isabel, 2021. "Balance with logic-measuring the performance and sustainable development efforts of an NPO in rural Ethiopia," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Patricia Inês Schwantz & Leander Luiz Klein & Eugênio de Oliveira Simonetto, 2023. "The Relationship between Lean Practices and Organizational Performance: An Analysis of Operations Management in a Public Institution," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Shepherd, 2011. "Conducting Diagnoses of M&E Systems and Capacities," World Bank Publications - Reports 11054, The World Bank Group.
    2. Gaarder, Marie M. & Bartsch, Ulrich, 2014. "The second wave of independence : shopping for solutions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7069, The World Bank.
    3. K K Govender & N.Z Hlatshwayo, 2015. "Monitoring and Evaluation in the Public Sector: A Case Study of the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform in South Africa," Asian Journal of Economics and Empirical Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 2(2), pages 91-99.
    4. Chen, Huey T. & Morosanu, Liliana & Powell-Threets, Kia & Lian, Brad & Turner, Nannette, 2019. "Assessment of the monitoring and evaluation system of a population-based program: Theory-driven evaluation approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:82:y:2020:i:c:s014971892030135x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.