IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v7y2014i1p12-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academics, Cultural Workers and Critical Labour Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Rosalind Gill

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to locate academics within the sights of critical labour studies, and, in particular, the contemporary interest in cultural workers. Despite a growing literature about - and in response to - the transformation of the University there have been few attempts to study academics as workers. This paper argues that there are a number of parallels between academic work and the much more well-documented experiences of work in the cultural and creative industries. The paper examines the increasing experience of precariousness among academics, the intensification and extensification of work, and the new modes of surveillance in the academy and their affective impacts. The aim of the article is to build on the critical lexicon of studies of cultural labour in order to think about academic work as labour and to generate new ways of thinking about power, privilege and exploitation. It argues for the need for a psychosocial perspective that can understand the new labouring subjectivities in academia.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosalind Gill, 2014. "Academics, Cultural Workers and Critical Labour Studies," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 12-30, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:12-30
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2013.861763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2013.861763
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2013.861763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meredith Nash & Brendan Churchill, 2020. "Caring during COVID‐19: A gendered analysis of Australian university responses to managing remote working and caring responsibilities," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 833-846, September.
    2. Papoulias, Stan (Constantina) & Callard, Felicity, 2022. "Material and epistemic precarity: It's time to talk about labour exploitation in mental health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    3. Sophie Hennekam & Sally Macarthur & Dawn Bennett & Cat Hope & Talisha Goh, 2019. "Inside the net: Women composers’ use of online communities of practice to build and support their careers," Post-Print hal-03232763, HAL.
    4. Rhys J. Williams, 2022. "The effect of casual teaching on student satisfaction: evidence from the UK," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 91-111, January.
    5. Barış Çıvak & Senem Besler, 2022. "A Critical Analysis of Managerial Control Mechanisms in Hotel Businesses," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    6. Janet Merkel, 2019. "‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 526-547, February.
    7. Ana Alacovska & Joëlle Bissonnette, 2021. "Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 135-151, February.
    8. Mark Banks, 2019. "Precarity, Biography, and Event: Work and Time in the Cultural Industries," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(4), pages 541-556, December.
    9. Hannah Durrant & Eleanor MacKillop, 2022. "University policy engagement bodies in the UK and the variable meanings of and approaches to impact," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 372-384.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:12-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.