IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v43y2016i16p2988-3003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient correction to the density-based empirical likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit test for the inverse Gaussian distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi
  • Albert Vexler

Abstract

The inverse Gaussian (IG) distribution is widely used to model positively skewed data. An important issue is to develop a powerful goodness-of-fit test for the IG distribution. We propose and examine novel test statistics for testing the IG goodness of fit based on the density-based empirical likelihood (EL) ratio concept. To construct the test statistics, we use a new approach that employs a method of the minimization of the discrimination information loss estimator to minimize Kullback–Leibler type information. The proposed tests are shown to be consistent against wide classes of alternatives. We show that the density-based EL ratio tests are more powerful than the corresponding classical goodness-of-fit tests. The practical efficiency of the tests is illustrated by using real data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi & Albert Vexler, 2016. "An efficient correction to the density-based empirical likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit test for the inverse Gaussian distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(16), pages 2988-3003, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:16:p:2988-3003
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1156657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2016.1156657
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2016.1156657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Vexler & Jihnhee Yu & Alan D. Hutson, 2011. "Likelihood testing populations modeled by autoregressive process subject to the limit of detection in applications to longitudinal biomedical data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 1333-1346, May.
    2. Vexler, Albert & Gurevich, Gregory, 2010. "Empirical likelihood ratios applied to goodness-of-fit tests based on sample entropy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 531-545, February.
    3. Albert Vexler & Wan-Min Tsai & Alan D. Hutson, 2014. "A Simple Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Independence," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 158-169, February.
    4. Soofi, E. S. & Retzer, J. J., 2002. "Information indices: unification and applications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1-2), pages 17-40, March.
    5. Albert Vexler & Young Min Kim & Jihnhee Yu & Nicole A. Lazar & Alan D. Hutson, 2014. "Computing Critical Values of Exact Tests by Incorporating Monte Carlo Simulations Combined with Statistical Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1013-1030, December.
    6. Wan-Min Tsai & Albert Vexler & Gregory Gurevich, 2013. "An extensive power evaluation of a novel two-sample density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for paired data with an application to a treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder a," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 1189-1208, June.
    7. Ebrahimi, Nader & Pflughoeft, Kurt & Soofi, Ehsan S., 1994. "Two measures of sample entropy," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 225-234, June.
    8. Albert Vexler & Shuling Liu & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2011. "Nonparametric-likelihood inference based on cost-effectively-sampled-data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 769-783, February.
    9. Miecznikowski, Jeffrey & Vexler, Albert & Shepherd, Lori, 2013. "dbEmpLikeGOF: An R Package for Nonparametric Likelihood Ratio Tests for Goodness-of-Fit and Two-Sample Comparisons Based on Sample Entropy," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 54(i03).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood ratio-based goodness-of-fit test for the logistic distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 1973-1983, September.
    2. Vexler, Albert & Zou, Li, 2022. "Linear projections of joint symmetry and independence applied to exact testing treatment effects based on multidimensional outcomes," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Pavia, Jose M., 2015. "Testing Goodness-of-Fit with the Kernel Density Estimator: GoFKernel," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(c01).
    4. Bagkavos, Dimitrios & Patil, Prakash N., 2023. "Goodness-of-fit testing for normal mixture densities," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Hart, Jeffrey D. & Choi, Taeryon & Yi, Seongbaek, 2016. "Frequentist nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests via marginal likelihood ratios," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 120-132.
    6. Salois, Matthew & Moss, Charles, 2010. "An Information Approach to the Dynamics in Farm Income: Implications for Farmland Markets," MPRA Paper 26850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Scharfenaker, Ellis, 2020. "Implications of quantal response statistical equilibrium," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Emanuele Citera, 2021. "Stock Returns, Market Trends, and Information Theory: A Statistical Equilibrium Approach," Working Papers 2116, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    9. Asok K. Nanda & Shovan Chowdhury, 2021. "Shannon's Entropy and Its Generalisations Towards Statistical Inference in Last Seven Decades," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 167-185, April.
    10. Ellis Scharfenaker, 2022. "Statistical Equilibrium Methods In Analytical Political Economy," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 276-309, April.
    11. Wen Chen & Jinjie Wang & Jianli Ding & Xiangyu Ge & Lijing Han & Shaofeng Qin, 2023. "Detecting Long-Term Series Eco-Environmental Quality Changes and Driving Factors Using the Remote Sensing Ecological Index with Salinity Adaptability (RSEI SI ): A Case Study in the Tarim River Basin,," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, June.
    12. Menéndez, M. & Morales, D. & Pardo, L., 1997. "Maximum entropy principle and statistical inference on condensed ordered data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 85-93, May.
    13. Wei Ning & Grace Ngunkeng, 2013. "An empirical likelihood ratio based goodness-of-fit test for skew normality," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(2), pages 209-226, June.
    14. Jan Rosenzweig, 2023. "A Tale of Tail Covariances (and Diversified Tails)," Papers 2302.13646, arXiv.org.
    15. Golan, Amos & Perloff, Jeffrey M., 2002. "Comparison of maximum entropy and higher-order entropy estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1-2), pages 195-211, March.
    16. Matthew Salois & Charles Moss & Kenneth Erickson, 2012. "Farm income, population and farmland prices: a relative information approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(2), pages 289-307, April.
    17. Scharfenaker, Ellis & dos Santos, Paulo L., 2015. "The distribution and regulation of Tobin’s q," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 191-194.
    18. Juan Melo, 2024. "Decentralized Finance and Local Public Goods: A Bayesian Maximum Entropy Model of School District Spending in the U.S," Papers 2404.17700, arXiv.org.
    19. Golan, Amos, 2002. "Information and Entropy Econometrics--Editor's View," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1-2), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Carpio, Carlos E. & Sydorovych, Olha & Marra, Michele C., 2007. "Relative Importance of Environmental Attributes Using Logistic Regression," 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama 34846, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:43:y:2016:i:16:p:2988-3003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.