IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v28y2001i1p5-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prior distribution assessment for a multivariate normal distribution: An experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • S. A. Al-Awadhi
  • P. H. Garthwaite

Abstract

A variety of methods of eliciting a prior distribution for a multivariate normal (MVN) distribution have recently been proposed. This paper reports an experiment in which 16 meteorologists used the methods to quantify their opinions about climatology variables. Our results compare prior models and show, in particular, that it can be better to assume the mean and variance of an MVN distribution are independent a priori, rather than to model opinion by the conjugate prior distribution. Using a proper scoring rule, different forms of assessment task are examined and alternative ways of estimating parameters are compared. To quantify opinion about means, it proved preferable to ask directly about the means rather than individual observations while, to quantify opinion about the variance matrix, it was best to ask about deviations from the mean. Further results include recommendations for the way parameters of the prior distribution are estimated.

Suggested Citation

  • S. A. Al-Awadhi & P. H. Garthwaite, 2001. "Prior distribution assessment for a multivariate normal distribution: An experimental study," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 5-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:28:y:2001:i:1:p:5-23
    DOI: 10.1080/02664760120011563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02664760120011563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664760120011563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Lenthe, Jelle, 1994. "Scoring-Rule Feedforward and the Elicitation of Subjective Probability Distributions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 188-209, August.
    2. Garthwaite, Paul H. & Dickey, James M., 1985. "Double- and single-bisection methods for subjective probability assessment in a location-scale family," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 149-163.
    3. Paul H. Garthwaite & Shafeeqah A. Al‐Awadhi, 2001. "Non‐conjugate prior distribution assessment for multivariate normal sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 63(1), pages 95-110.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary Kynn, 2008. "The ‘heuristics and biases’ bias in expert elicitation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 239-264, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ivo Molenaar, 1998. "Data, model, conclusion, doing it again," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 315-340, December.
    2. Lau, Hon-Shiang & Lau, Amy Hing-Ling, 1997. "Some results on implementing a multi-item multi-constraint single-period inventory model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 121-128, January.
    3. Triantafyllopoulos, K., 2008. "Missing observation analysis for matrix-variate time series data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(16), pages 2647-2653, November.
    4. Werner, Christoph & Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger M. & Hanea, Anca M. & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2017. "Expert judgement for dependence in probabilistic modelling: A systematic literature review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 801-819.
    5. John Paul Gosling & Andy Hart & David C. Mouat & Mirzet Sabirovic & Simon Scanlan & Alick Simmons, 2012. "Quantifying Experts’ Uncertainty About the Future Cost of Exotic Diseases," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 881-893, May.
    6. Mary Kynn, 2008. "The ‘heuristics and biases’ bias in expert elicitation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(1), pages 239-264, January.
    7. Shafiqah Al-Awadhi & Paul Garthwaite, 2006. "Quantifying expert opinion for modelling fauna habitat distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 121-140, March.
    8. Lau, Hon-Shiang & Lau, Amy Hing-Ling & Kottas, John F., 2000. "A comparison of procedures for estimating the parent probability distribution from a given set of fractiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 657-670, February.
    9. Saurabh Bansal & Genaro J. Gutierrez & John R. Keiser, 2017. "Using Experts’ Noisy Quantile Judgments to Quantify Risks: Theory and Application to Agribusiness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1115-1130, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:28:y:2001:i:1:p:5-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.