IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v17y2006i2p209-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty?

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Joseph

Abstract

I critically assess the potential for mixed‐income development as a means of helping lift families in U.S. inner cities out of poverty. I identify four main propositions for the promise of mixed‐income development, provide a conceptual framework that delineates the pathways through which mixed‐income development can be hypothesized to improve the quality of life for the urban poor, and review the evidence from existing research on the relevance of these propositions. Because of the scale and possible elimination of the HOPE VI (Housing Opportunities for People Everywhere) program, I pay particular attention to what we have learned from it. The most compelling propositions are those that do not rely on social interaction to promote a higher quality of life for low‐income residents and instead predict benefits through greater informal social control and higher‐quality goods and services. I consider the limitations of this strategy and policy implications for future mixed‐income development.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Joseph, 2006. "Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty?," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 209-234.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:209-234
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2006.9521567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2006.9521567
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2006.9521567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Hankins & Mechelle Puckett & Deirdre Oakley & Erin Ruel, 2014. "Forced Mobility: The Relocation of Public-Housing Residents in Atlanta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2932-2949, December.
    2. Chu Chu & Rie Nomura & Suguru Mori, 2019. "Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. George Galster & Roger Andersson & Sako Musterd, 2010. "Who Is Affected by Neighbourhood Income Mix? Gender, Age, Family, Employment and Income Differences," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(14), pages 2915-2944, December.
    4. Richard Lawder & David Walsh & Ade Kearns & Mark Livingston, 2014. "Healthy Mixing? Investigating the Associations between Neighbourhood Housing Tenure Mix and Health Outcomes for Urban Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 264-283, February.
    5. Ali Sharghi & Abdolmajid Nourtaghani & Mehrnaz Ramzanpour & Reza Bagheri Gorji, 2022. "Low-income housing location based on affordable criteria Using AHP Model and GIS Technique (Case Study: Babolsar City)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10337-10377, August.
    6. Derek Hyra, 2015. "The back-to-the-city movement: Neighbourhood redevelopment and processes of political and cultural displacement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(10), pages 1753-1773, August.
    7. Mark Joseph & Robert Chaskin, 2010. "Living in a Mixed-Income Development: Resident Perceptions of the Benefits and Disadvantages of Two Developments in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2347-2366, October.
    8. Lynne C. Manzo & Rachel G. Kleit & Dawn Couch, 2008. "“Moving Three Times Is Like Having Your House on Fire Once†: The Experience of Place and Impending Displacement among Public Housing Residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(9), pages 1855-1878, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:17:y:2006:i:2:p:209-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.