IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2409-d225222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Chu Chu

    (Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

  • Rie Nomura

    (Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

  • Suguru Mori

    (Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, North 13, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan)

Abstract

Mixed habitation environments have gradually proved to be an effective planning method to promote social integration in many countries. However, due to the differences in the social backgrounds of each country, it is essential to implement construction methods suitable for local conditions. On the other hand, the planning theories and construction methods discussed from multiple perspectives, including an architectural perspective of spatial forms, have been insufficient, which is not conducive to constructing a sustainable dwelling environment. This article aims to clarify the planning status of spatial forms and their issues by investigating existing projects with mixed habitation environments in China. Unlike other countries that have implemented relevant policies for many years, China has just begun to explore relevant schemes (i.e., public-rental housing in private-owned housing complexes) aiming to promote mixed habitation environments. The selected research objects included all projects already inhabited at the end of June 2017 in the city of Beijing. Through field survey, the research objects were divided into eight types via an analysis of building layouts and residents’ traffic lines. The results show that out of the many research objects, two kinds of housing were clearly distinctive, and only a few research objects matched the basic conditions to be defined as a mixed habitation. The conditions are not conducive to the formation of mixed habitation; therefore, a more detailed discussion on how to design a mixed habitation environment is necessary to aid further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu Chu & Rie Nomura & Suguru Mori, 2019. "Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2409-:d:225222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2409/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2409/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erin M. Graves, 2011. "Mixed Outcome Developments," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 143-153, April.
    2. Shengfu Yang & Shougeng Hu & Weidong Li & Chuanrong Zhang & José A. Torres, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Effects of Main Impact Factors on Residential Land Price in Major Cities of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Ya Wang & Alan Murie, 2011. "The New Affordable and Social Housing Provision System in China: Implications for Comparative Housing Studies," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 237-254.
    4. Marie‐Hélène Bacqué & Yankel Fijalkow & Lydie Launay & Stéphanie Vermeersch, 2011. "Social Mix Policies in Paris: Discourses, Policies and Social Effects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 256-273, March.
    5. Yanchuan Mou & Qingsong He & Bo Zhou, 2017. "Detecting the Spatially Non-Stationary Relationships between Housing Price and Its Determinants in China: Guide for Housing Market Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.
    6. Ya Ping Wang & Alan Murie, 2000. "Social and Spatial Implications of Housing Reform in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 397-417, June.
    7. Dezhi Li & Yanchao Chen & Hongxia Chen & Eddie Chi Man Hui & Kai Guo, 2016. "Evaluation and Optimization of the Financial Sustainability of Public Rental Housing Projects: A Case Study in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Rachel Garshick Kleit, 2005. "HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1413-1441, August.
    9. Molero-Simarro, Ricardo, 2017. "Inequality in China revisited. The effect of functional distribution of income on urban top incomes, the urban-rural gap and the Gini index, 1978–2015," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 101-117.
    10. Philip Lawton, 2013. "Understanding Urban Practitioners' Perspectives on Social-Mix Policies in Amsterdam: The Importance of Design and Social Space," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 98-118, February.
    11. Daquan Huang & Xiaoqing Yang & Zhen Liu & Xingshuo Zhao & Fanhao Kong, 2018. "The Dynamic Impacts of Employment Subcenters on Residential Land Price in Transitional China: An Examination of the Beijing Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Pan, Haozhi & Deal, Brian & Chen, Yan & Hewings, Geoffrey, 2018. "A Reassessment of urban structure and land-use patterns: distance to CBD or network-based? — Evidence from Chicago," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 215-228.
    13. Mark Joseph, 2006. "Is mixed‐income development an antidote to urban poverty?," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 209-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaroslav Burian & Karel Macků & Jarmila Zimmermannová & Barbora Kočvarová, 2018. "Spatio-Temporal Changes and Dependencies of Land Prices: A Case Study of the City of Olomouc," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Zhiheng Yang & Chenxi Li & Yongheng Fang, 2020. "Driving Factors of the Industrial Land Transfer Price Based on a Geographically Weighted Regression Model: Evidence from a Rural Land System Reform Pilot in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Mark Joseph & Robert Chaskin, 2010. "Living in a Mixed-Income Development: Resident Perceptions of the Benefits and Disadvantages of Two Developments in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(11), pages 2347-2366, October.
    4. Amie Thurber & Claire Riehle Bohmann & Craig Anne Heflinger, 2018. "Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1859-1874, July.
    5. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2017. "Influences on the policy process in local government in Vietnam: The case of low-income housing policy in Da Nang City from 2005-2013," OSF Preprints zvbmc, Center for Open Science.
    6. Can Li & Yu Meng & Yingkui Li & Jingfeng Ge & Chaoran Zhao, 2019. "Inter-Metropolitan Land-Price Characteristics and Patterns in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Shauna Brail & Nishi Kumar, 2017. "Community leadership and engagement after the mix: The transformation of Toronto’s Regent Park," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(16), pages 3772-3788, December.
    8. Song, Malin & Xie, Qianjiao & Chen, Jiandong, 2022. "Effects of government competition on land prices under opening up conditions: A case study of the Huaihe River ecological economic belt," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    9. Zan Yang & Songtao Wang, 2011. "The impact of privatization of public housing on housing affordability in Beijing: An assessment using household survey data," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(5), pages 384-400, August.
    10. Wang, Zheng-Xin & Jv, Yue-Qi, 2023. "Revisiting income inequality among households: New evidence from the Chinese Household Income Project," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Daniel Fu Keung Wong & He Xue Song, 2008. "The Resilience of Migrant Workers in Shanghai China: the Roles of Migration Stress and Meaning of Migration," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(2), pages 131-143, March.
    12. Kheir, Nasr & Portnov, Boris A., 2024. "Land market segmentation along ethnic lines: Four urban localities in Israel as a case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    13. Yong Liu & Cuihong Long, 2021. "Urban and Rural Income Gap: Does Urban Spatial Form Matter in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    14. Ingvild Almås & Eleonora Freddi & Øystein Thøgersen, 2020. "Saving and Bequest in China: An Analysis of Intergenerational Exchange," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(345), pages 249-281, January.
    15. Marie-Hélène Bacqué & Eric Charmes & Stéphanie Vermeersch, 2014. "The Middle Class ‘at Home among the Poor’ — How Social Mix is Lived in Parisian Suburbs: Between Local Attachment and Metropolitan Practices," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1211-1233, July.
    16. Chen, Jie & Nong, Huifu, 2016. "The heterogeneity of market supply effects of public housing provision: Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 115-127.
    17. Min Zhou & Wei Guo, 2023. "Self-rated Health and Objective Health Status Among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China: A Healthy Housing Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Ji Han & Jiabin Liu, 2018. "Urban Spatial Interaction Analysis Using Inter-City Transport Big Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Xuanming Ji & Kun Wang & He Xu & Muchen Li, 2021. "Has Digital Financial Inclusion Narrowed the Urban-Rural Income Gap: The Role of Entrepreneurship in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Guan, Xiaodong, 2017. "The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: Residential self-selection or residential determination?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2409-:d:225222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.