IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v27y2018i4p713-745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Evidence on the Role of Proxy Advisors in European Capital Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Joerg-Markus Hitz
  • Nico Lehmann

Abstract

Responding to regulators’ requests and filling a void in the academic literature, this paper provides comprehensive empirical evidence on the role of proxy advisors in 14 European countries. Exploiting coverage data and using content analysis of proxy voting reports by Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis, we provide descriptive analyses of proxy advisors’ firm coverage, the variation and determinants of voting recommendations, the relation between voting recommendations and shareholder voting at annual general meetings, and market reactions to the release of voting recommendations. Overall, our findings suggest an economically important role of proxy advisors in European markets. Throughout our analyses, we document that this role varies with governance- and ownership-related firm characteristics and with country-level measures of institutional strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Joerg-Markus Hitz & Nico Lehmann, 2018. "Empirical Evidence on the Role of Proxy Advisors in European Capital Markets," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 713-745, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:27:y:2018:i:4:p:713-745
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2017.1305282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2017.1305282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2017.1305282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nico Lehmann, 2019. "Do Corporate Governance Analysts Matter? Evidence from the Expansion of Governance Analyst Coverage," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 721-761, June.
    2. Dasgupta, Amil & Fos, Vyacheslav & Sautner, Zacharias, 2021. "Institutional investors and corporate governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112114, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Schneider, Julian, 2023. "Förderung der Transparenz oder Kosten für die Aktionäre? Beurteilung der Regulierung von Proxy Advisors anhand der U.S.-Marktreaktion [Promoting Transparency or Harming Shareholders? U.S. Market Re," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(1), pages 148-162.
    4. Miyachi, Hiroaki & Takeda, Fumiko, 2024. "Empirical study on voting results and proxy advisor recommendations in Japan," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Paul M. Guest & Marco Nerino, 2019. "Do Corporate Governance Ratings Change Investor Expectations? Evidence from Announcements by Institutional Shareholder Services," Working Papers wp515, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    6. Ishida, Souhei & Kochiyama, Takuma, 2020. "ISS’s Proxy Voting Guidelines and ROE Management," Working Paper Series 235, Management Innovation Research Center, School of Business Administration, Hitotsubashi University Business School.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:27:y:2018:i:4:p:713-745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.