IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v13y2006i4p489-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adam Smith's use of multiple references for his pin making example

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Peaucelle

Abstract

At the beginning of The Wealth of Nations Adam Smith describes a pin factory. It is widely accepted that this example comes from Diderot's Encyclopaedia, published in France in the 18th century. The details in the text together with the conferences previously given in Glasgow clearly show that this one reference cannot be the only source. Three other French publications on pin making may also have been used as references for Adam Smith's text. Phrase by phrase these texts are compared to Smith's to support the assertion that he based his work on four previous French publications. The Wealth of Nations unites and synthesizes these different sources and excerpts those parts that confirm his theory. Smith should have listed his sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2006. "Adam Smith's use of multiple references for his pin making example," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 489-512.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:13:y:2006:i:4:p:489-512
    DOI: 10.1080/09672560601025829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09672560601025829
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672560601025829?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murray N. Rothbard, 1995. "Economic Thought Before Adam Smith," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 377, December.
    2. Rashid, Salim, 1986. "Adam Smith and the Division of Labour: A Historical View," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 33(3), pages 292-297, August.
    3. Jean-louis Peaucelle, 2005. "Raisonner sur les épingles, l'exemple d'Adam Smith sur la division du travail," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 115(4), pages 499-519.
    4. Groenewegen, P D, 1977. "Adam Smith and the Division of Labour: A Bicentenary Estimate," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(29), pages 161-174, December.
    5. Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2005. "Raisonner sur les épingles, l'exemple de Adam Smith sur la division du travail," Post-Print hal-01404601, HAL.
    6. Salim Rashid, 1998. "The Myth of Adam Smith," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1200, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daudin, Guillaume, 2010. "Domestic Trade and Market Size in Late-Eighteenth-Century France," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 70(3), pages 716-743, September.
    2. Łukasz Hardt, 2023. "On the Modelling Method in Adam Smith’s Economic Thought," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 3-18.
    3. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/2241 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/b0ghejdpldro9c499h4ajc937 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/b0ghejdpldro9c499h4ajc937 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Guillaume Daudin, 2010. "Domestic Trade and Market Size in Late 18th century France," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03587807, HAL.
    7. Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2012. "Rhetoric and logic in Smith's Description of the Division of Labor," Post-Print hal-01402198, HAL.
    8. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/b0ghejdpldro9c499h4ajc937 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/2241 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Perelman, Michael, 2010. "Adam Smith: Class, labor, and the industrial revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 481-496, December.
    11. Michael Best, 2012. "The Obscure Firm in the Wealth of Nations," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2241 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2006. "Adam Smith's use of multiple references for his pin making example," Post-Print hal-01403682, HAL.
    2. DelliSanti, Dylan, 2021. "The dynamism of liberalism: An esoteric interpretation of Adam Smith," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 717-726.
    3. Reinhard Schumacher, 2016. "Adam Smith and the “rich country–poor country” debate: eighteenth-century views on economic progress and international trade," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 764-793, September.
    4. Vergés Josep C., 2000. "The Political Economy of the Just Price: What the School of Salamanca Has To Say in the Age of Corruption," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Robert Ekelund & Robert Tollison, 1997. "On neoinstitutional theory and preclassical economies: mercantilism revisited," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 375-399.
    6. van Dun Frank, 1995. "The Lawful And The Legal," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 6(4), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Andreas Ortmann & David Baranowski & Benoit Walraevens, 2015. "Schumpeter’s Assessment of Adam Smith and The Wealth of Nations: Why He Got It Wrong," Discussion Papers 2015-28, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    8. Bruno Tinel, 2013. "Why and how do capitalists divide labor? From Marglin and back again through Babbage and Marx," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00763837, HAL.
    9. Scott Drylie, 2020. "Professional Scholarship from 1893 to 2020 on Adam Smith’s Views on School Funding: A Heterodox Examination," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 17(2), pages 350–391-3, September.
    10. José Luis Cendejas Bueno, 2021. "Justice and just price in Francisco de Vitoria's Commentary on Summa Theologica II-II q77," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 1-32, November.
    11. Marian Eabrasu, 2008. "An Assessment of Subjectivism. Its Meaning and its Limits," ICER Working Papers 01-2008, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    12. Robert Prasch, 1998. "Book Reviews," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(2), pages 234-236.
    13. Ivan Verbanov, 2003. "Forerunner of the Theories of the Free Market Economy," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 72-88.
    14. Samuel Gregg, 2004. "Ethics And The Market Economy: Insights From Catholic Moral Theology," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 4-10, June.
    15. Panayotis G. Michaelides & John G. Milios & Angelos Vouldis & Spyros Lapatsioras, 2010. "Heterodox influences on Schumpeter," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 197-213, February.
    16. Ecem Okan, 2017. "How did it all begin? Adam Smith on the early and rude state of society and the age of hunters," Post-Print hal-03171143, HAL.
    17. Hülsmann Jörg Guido, 2001. "More on Cantillon as a Proto-Austrian," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Altug Yalcintas & Isil Sirin Selcuk, 2016. "Research Ethics Education in Economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 53-74, March.
    19. Jimena Hurtado & Maria Pia Paganelli, 2023. "Diamonds are not forever: Adam Smith and Carl Menger on value and relative status," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(2), pages 289-310, June.
    20. Benito Arrunada, "undated". "Catholic Confessions of Sin as Third Party Moral Enforcement," Gruter Institute Working Papers on Law, Economics, and Evolutionary Biology 3-1-1013, Berkeley Electronic Press.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:13:y:2006:i:4:p:489-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.