IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01404601.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Raisonner sur les épingles, l'exemple de Adam Smith sur la division du travail

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Peaucelle

    (UR - Université de La Réunion)

Abstract

In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith illustrates the importance of the division of labour with an example of a pin making enterprise. He compares an 18-step production process with an artifi cial benchmark. Measured productivity is 240 times that of the benchmark. This reasoning is negligent. Adam Smith could have found more credible, although less spectacular examples in the literature of his time. Diderot's Encyclopaedia twice described this production approach in France. One articl e is quite detailed. The benefits from the division of labour are the cost gains due to wage differences between the different steps. Furthermore, manufacturing was delocalised to rural areas where lower cost labourers worked to complement a farming income. Another influence is lot size. Large productivity gains are visible when several pins are worked on at the same time. The analysis of historical texts shows how other factors also encouraged the division of labour.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2005. "Raisonner sur les épingles, l'exemple de Adam Smith sur la division du travail," Post-Print hal-01404601, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01404601
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01404601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01404601/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jean-Louis Peaucelle, 2006. "Adam Smith's use of multiple references for his pin making example," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 489-512.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01404601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.