IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v33y2021i1p20-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are CGE models reliable for disaster impact analyses?

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Zhou
  • Zhenhua Chen

Abstract

This study investigates a fundamental issue of computable general equilibrium (CGE) modeling: are CGE models reliable for measuring the economic consequence analysis of disasters? We assess the outputs of CGE analyses after controlling for various modeling factors such as data, type of model, and modeling mechanisms via a meta-analysis of 253 CGE simulations in 57 empirical studies. Our study arrives at three major findings. First, we confirm that resilience significantly reduces business disruptions from disasters. Second, results using either real-world or hypothetical data tend to vary substantially by hazard type. Third, results are quite sensitive to model assumptions and modeling structure. Overall, we suggest that future impact assessments of disasters should be conducted more cautiously in terms of adopting appropriate data, models, and shock scenarios, in order to improve the validity of CGE modeling outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Zhou & Zhenhua Chen, 2021. "Are CGE models reliable for disaster impact analyses?," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 20-46, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:20-46
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2020.1780566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2020.1780566
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2020.1780566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam Rose, 2022. "Behavioral Economic Consequences of Disasters: A Basis for Inclusion in Benefit–Cost Analysis," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 213-233, July.
    2. Pradeep V. Mandapaka & Edmond Y. M. Lo, 2023. "Assessing Shock Propagation and Cascading Uncertainties Using the Input–Output Framework: Analysis of an Oil Refinery Accident in Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Araujo, Inacio F. & Donaghy, Kieran P. & Haddad, Eduardo A. & Hewings, Geoffrey J.D., 2024. "Geographical Propagation of the Economic Impacts of the ISIS Conflict in Iraq," TD NEREUS 6-2024, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    4. Jan Gaska, 2023. "Losses from Fluvial Floods in Poland over the 21st Century – Estimation Using the Productivity Costs Method," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 357-383, November.
    5. Vivienne Reiner & Navoda Liyana Pathirana & Ya-Yen Sun & Manfred Lenzen & Arunima Malik, 2024. "Wish You Were Here? The Economic Impact of the Tourism Shutdown from Australia’s 2019-20 ‘Black Summer’ Bushfires," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 107-127, March.
    6. Davide Bazzana & Aidin Mobasser & Sergio Vergalli, 2022. "Less Water, Less Oil: Policy Response for the Kenyan Future, a CGE Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    7. Shahnawaz Rafi & Sisi Meng & Joost Santos & Pallab Mozumder, 2024. "Extreme Weather Events and the Performance of Critical Utility Infrastructures: A Case Study of Hurricane Harvey," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 33-60, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:33:y:2021:i:1:p:20-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.