IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v30y2018i1p85-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De-industrialization and comparative advantage in the global value chain

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Peneder
  • Gerhard Streicher

Abstract

We investigate the causes of de-industrialization and potential for re-industrialization using trade-linked input–output data from WIOD. By introducing a new global value chain measure of comparative advantage, we relate a sector's share in domestic final demand to that in production and separate the direct effect of trade on its income share. This method identifies the declining share of manufacturing value added in domestic final expenditures to be the main cause of de-industrialization. Differences in comparative advantage between countries do matter, especially in the case of employment shares, but have a limited impact via the direct trade effect on value added. The findings point to a peculiar paradox of industrial policy: precisely when it is successful in raising competitiveness and hence productivity growth of manufacturing, it also furthers the global decline of relative prices in manufacturing. In contrast to the national objectives of re-industrialization, effective industrial policies accelerate de-industrialization in the global economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Peneder & Gerhard Streicher, 2018. "De-industrialization and comparative advantage in the global value chain," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 85-104, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:85-104
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2017.1320274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2017.1320274
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2017.1320274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Suzanne with the MIT Task Force on Production in the Innovation Economy, 2013. "Making in America: From Innovation to Market," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262019914, April.
    2. Sposi, Michael, 2019. "Evolving comparative advantage, sectoral linkages, and structural change," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 75-87.
    3. Philippe Aghion & Julian Boulanger & Elie Cohen, 2011. "Rethinking industrial policy," Policy Briefs 566, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2019. "Manufacture Content and Financialisation: An Empirical Assessment," Department of Economics University of Siena 811, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    2. N.A. Nevskaya & A.P. Garnov & A.V. Brykin & E.V. Malakhova, 2018. "National Competitiveness as the Object of Indicative Planning in the Context of Re-industrialization," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special1), pages 148-155.
    3. Michael Peneder & Matthias Firgo & Gerhard Streicher, 2019. "Stand der Digitalisierung in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61654.
    4. Michael Peneder & Nicole Schmidt & Anna Strauss & Stefan Weingärtner, 2018. "Österreichs Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im internationalen Vergleich," WIFO Working Papers 565, WIFO.
    5. repec:wsr:pbrief:y:2018:i:039 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Yu, Hui & Li, Huiru, 2023. "How does the global metal industry value network affect industrial structure upgrading ? The perspective of industry chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    7. S. V. Kuznetsov & A. E. Miller & L. M. Davidenko, 2019. "Development Prospects of Technological Integration: Regional Perspective," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 15-21, January.
    8. Martin Labaj & Stracova Erika, 2019. "Drivers of Deindustrialisation: Sub-system Analysis of Internationally Fragmented Production Structures," Department of Economic Policy Working Paper Series 018, Department of Economic Policy, Faculty of National Economy, University of Economics in Bratislava.
    9. Huma Jamshaid & Muhammad Nauman Abbasi & Raza Ali, 2024. "Sustainability Amplified: Servitization, Integration and Buyer-Supplier Nexus," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 297-306.
    10. Kebede, Selamawit G. & Heshmati, Almas, 2023. "Political Economy of Industrialization and Industrial Parks in Ethiopia," IZA Discussion Papers 15846, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Çakır, Muhammet Sait & Aydemir, Resul, 2022. "A Dutch disease approach into the premature deindustrialization," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    12. Sanja Franc & Antea Barišić & Zoran Wittine, 2020. "The Dilemma over Washington Consensus Guidelines or Industrial Policy: Lessons from Croatia," Notitia - journal for economic, business and social issues, Notitia Ltd., vol. 1(6), pages 49-62, December.
    13. Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández & Lionello F. Punzo, 2018. "A Multi-Sectoral Approach to Financialisation," Department of Economics University of Siena 794, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Mayerhofer, 2013. "Wiens Industrie in der wissensbasierten Stadtwirtschaft. Wandlungsprozesse, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, industriepolitische Ansatzpunkte," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57934.
    2. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissensintensive Unternehmensdienste, Wissens-Spillovers und regionales Wachstum. Teilprojekt 1: Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung – Welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert das Wach," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58342.
    3. Karl Aiginger, 2014. "Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path," WIFO Working Papers 469, WIFO.
    4. Michael Böheim, 2016. "Umweltpolitik als Kernelement einer systemischen Industriepolitik zur Förderung eines nachhaltigen Wirtschaftswachstums," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 89(1), pages 39-46, January.
    5. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    6. Michael Peneder & Gerhard Streicher, 2016. "De- versus Re-industrialisation: Is Structural Change Reversible?," WIFO Working Papers 506, WIFO.
    7. Karl Aiginger, 2014. "Industrial Policy for a Sustainable Growth Path. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 13," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47261.
    8. Reis, Anabela & Heitor, Manuel & Amaral, Miguel & Mendonça, Joana, 2016. "Revisiting industrial policy: Lessons learned from the establishment of an automotive OEM in Portugal," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 195-205.
    9. Alje van Dam & Koen Frenken, 2020. "Vertical vs. Horizontal Policy in a Capabilities Model of Economic Development," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2037, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Aug 2020.
    10. Chenyu Dai & Fengliang Liu, 2023. "Impact of Energy Productivity and Industrial Structural Change on Energy Intensity in China: Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock & Ranita Jain & Maureen Conway, 2021. "Genesis at work: Advancing inclusive innovation through manufacturing extension," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(3), pages 224-241, May.
    12. Seung Mo Choi & Hwagyun Kim & Xiaohan Ma, 2021. "Trade policies and growth in emerging economies: policy experiments," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 157(3), pages 603-629, August.
    13. Landesmann, Michael A. & Stöllinger, Roman, 2019. "Structural change, trade and global production networks: An ‘appropriate industrial policy’ for peripheral and catching-up economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 7-23.
    14. Patrick Alexander, 2021. "Vertical specialisation and gains from trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1110-1140, April.
    15. Diao, Xinshen & McMillan, Margaret, 2018. "Toward an Understanding of Economic Growth in Africa: A Reinterpretation of the Lewis Model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 511-522.
    16. Brown, Clair & Sturgeon, Timothy & Lane, Julia, 2014. "Using a business function framework to examine outsourcing and offshoring by US organizations," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt7cw581tg, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    17. Mark R. Ryan, 2018. "Teaching the Common Good in Business Ethics: A Case Study Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 693-704, February.
    18. Rehfeld, Dieter & Terstriep, Judith, 2019. "Rückwärts in die Zukunft? Ein Essay zur jüngsten Debatte um Industriepolitik," Forschung Aktuell 04/2019, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    19. Sascha Sardadvar & Christian Reiner, 2017. "Does the presence of high-skilled employees increase total and high-skilled employment in the long run? Evidence from Austria," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(1), pages 59-89, February.
    20. Mariachiara Barzotto & Giancarlo Corò & Ilaria Mariotti & Marco Mutinelli, 2019. "Ownership and workforce composition: a counterfactual analysis of foreign multinationals and Italian uni-national firms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(4), pages 581-607, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:30:y:2018:i:1:p:85-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.