IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v23y2005i7p685-696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing a framework for building relationships and trust in project organizations: two case studies of building projects in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao-Hua Jin
  • Florence Yean Yng Ling

Abstract

A framework is constructed that can be used to foster trust and build relationships in construction project organizations in China. The research method was based on in-depth study of two building projects in China and data were collected via face-to-face interviews. The results show that as the project progresses, the dominant relationship within each stage deepens. The deepening relationship gives rise to different types of inherent risks such as a partner's self-interest seeking behaviour and opportunistic actions. To counterbalance these risks, trust fostering tools must be employed such as careful selection and effective management of partners. The framework for fostering trust and building relationship developed in the study suggests that (1) relationship deepens from shallow dependence to deep interdependence as the project progresses; (2) different relationships bring about distinct inherent risks; and (3) different trust-fostering tools counterbalance specific inherent risks. This framework could aid in reducing adversarial relationships by suggesting ways to foster trustworthy relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao-Hua Jin & Florence Yean Yng Ling, 2005. "Constructing a framework for building relationships and trust in project organizations: two case studies of building projects in China," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(7), pages 685-696.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:7:p:685-696
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190500127039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190500127039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190500127039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve Rowlinson, 2001. "Matrix organizational structure, culture and commitment: a Hong Kong public sector case study of change," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 669-673.
    2. Prapatpaow Awakul & Stephen Ogunlana, 2002. "The effect of attitudinal differences on interface conflicts in large scale construction projects: a case study," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 365-377.
    3. Albert Chan, 2000. "Evaluation of enhanced design and build system - a case study of a hospital project," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(7), pages 863-871.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering & Mohamed El-Sioufi, 2021. "Tension, Conflict, and Negotiability of Land for Infrastructure Retrofit Practices in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Berthomé, Guy-El-Karim & Thomas, Alban, 2017. "A Context-based Procedure for Assessing Participatory Schemes in Environmental Planning," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 113-123.
    3. Albert Chan & Esther Yung & Patrick Lam & C. M. Tam & S. O. Cheung, 2001. "Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 699-718.
    4. Summaira Malik & Muhammad Taqi & José Moleiro Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & João Manuel Pereira & António Abreu, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Communication and Success of Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Conflict," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Chan Young Park & Seung Heon Han & Kang-Wook Lee & Yong Myoung Lee, 2017. "Analyzing Drivers of Conflict in Energy Infrastructure Projects: Empirical Case Study of Natural Gas Pipeline Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Haiying Luan & Long Li & Shengxi Zhang, 2022. "Exploring the Impact Mechanism of Interface Management Performance of Sustainable Prefabricated Construction: The Perspective of Stakeholder Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Richard A. Kolawole & Kamau K. Peter & Munala Gerryshom, 2016. "Change Order Management Factors in Building Projects in Northern Nigeria," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 223-236, January.
    8. Olabode Gafar Babalola & Mohammad Masfiqul Alam Bhuiyan & Ahmed Hammad, 2024. "Literature Review on Collaborative Project Delivery for Sustainable Construction: Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-36, September.
    9. Shengxi Zhang & Zhongfu Li & Shengbin Ma & Long Li & Mengqi Yuan, 2022. "Critical Factors Influencing Interface Management of Prefabricated Building Projects: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    10. LaPatin, Michaela & Spearing, Lauryn A. & Tiedmann, Helena R. & Hacker, Miriam & Kavvada, Olga & Daniélou, Jean & Faust, Kasey M., 2023. "Controversy in wind energy construction projects: How social systems impact project performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Giovanni Esposito & Andrea Terlizzi, 2023. "Governing wickedness in megaprojects: discursive and institutional perspectives," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(2), pages 131-147.
    12. Rómulo Pinheiro & Bjørn Stensaker, 2014. "Designing the Entrepreneurial University: The Interpretation of a Global Idea," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 497-516, December.
    13. Iliyasu Shiyanbade Najeemdeen & Bello Taofik Abidemi & Farah Diana Rahmat & Bannah Daniel Bulus, 2018. "Perceived Organizational Culture and Perceived Organizational Support on Work Engagement," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 199-208, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:23:y:2005:i:7:p:685-696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.