IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v15y1997i2p161-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practices, barriers and benefits of risk management process in building services cost estimation

Author

Listed:
  • C. K. Mok
  • V.M. Rao Tummala
  • H. M. Leung

Abstract

The preparation of cost estimates for construction projects is not an easy job, because construction projects are subject to risks and uncertainties, particularly at the inception stage, when very limited information about the project is available. However, the cost estimates prepared at this stage are usually the most important to the client. Nowadays, the costs for building services installations contribute a significant share of the total construction cost of building projects. Thus the accuracy of the building services cost estimates plays an important role in the total building construction project cost estimates. Traditionally, building services cost estimates are prepared by a deterministic single-figure (most likely) approach. This approach is often cost-ineffective and reactionary in nature. The risk management process (RMP) provides a logical consistent framework in identifying the risk factors affecting costs and in making allowances for risks in cost estimation. A survey was conducted to find out the current building services cost estimation practices and to obtain an insight into the understanding, use and application of RMP in preparing building services cost estimates within the building services industry. The results of the survey have suggested that the traditional deterministic cost estimation method is still being adopted by the majority of building services engineers in preparing cost estimates. Also, RMP has not been widely adopted by the building services industry in Hong Kong. From the analysis of building services firms and engineers with regard to the critical success factors for implementation of risk management, the survey reflects that the potential of implementing RMP for building services cost estimation is high.

Suggested Citation

  • C. K. Mok & V.M. Rao Tummala & H. M. Leung, 1997. "Practices, barriers and benefits of risk management process in building services cost estimation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 161-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:161-175
    DOI: 10.1080/01446199700000004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446199700000004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446199700000004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C. Y. Yiu & C. S. Tam, 2006. "Rational under-pricing in bidding strategy: a real options model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 475-484.
    2. Elena Fregonara & Diego Giuseppe Ferrando & Sara Pattono, 2018. "Economic–Environmental Sustainability in Building Projects: Introducing Risk and Uncertainty in LCCE and LCCA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Peter Edwards & Paul Bowen, 1998. "Practices, barriers and benefits of risk management process in building services costs estimation: comment," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 105-108.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:15:y:1997:i:2:p:161-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.