IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cnpexx/v18y2013i1p89-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Dis-)Owning the Corporation: Three Models of Employee-Shareholder Activism

Author

Listed:
  • Natascha van der Zwan

Abstract

This article focuses on the experimentation with shareholder activism by employee representatives in several large German corporations. I argue that these experiments are a manifestation of a new politics of solidarity that has emerged in the wake of the financialisation process in Germany. What unites the employee-shareholder activists is a strong rejection of short-term shareholder value maximisation, particularly as it affects the corporation's employees. To this end, they have created of a new form of interest organisation, the so-called employee shareholder associations ( Vereine der Belegschaftsaktion�re or ESAs) that have institutionalised local practices of employee-shareholder activism within German corporations. In this article, I will take a closer look at three ESAs and their activities, each representing a different type of employee-shareholder activism: a 'front door strategy' at Deutsche Telekom, a 'back door strategy' at Siemens, and 'peeking through the window' at TUI. This article will demonstrate that shareholder activism by local employee representatives offers an innovative variation on the typical conflict lines within the corporation identified by scholars of corporate governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Natascha van der Zwan, 2013. "(Dis-)Owning the Corporation: Three Models of Employee-Shareholder Activism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 89-111, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:18:y:2013:i:1:p:89-111
    DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2012.658767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563467.2012.658767
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563467.2012.658767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter A. Gourevitch & James Shinn, 2007. "Introduction to Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance," Introductory Chapters, in: Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Bridgen & Marek Naczyk, 2019. "Shareholders of the World United? Organized Labour's Preferences on Corporate Governance under Pension Fund Capitalism in the United States, United Kingdom and France," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(3), pages 651-675, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sylvia Maxfield & W. Kindred Winecoff & Kevin L. Young, 2017. "An empirical investigation of the financialization convergence hypothesis," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 1004-1029, November.
    2. Ken-Hou Lin, 2016. "The Rise of Finance and Firm Employment Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 972-988, August.
    3. Kotz Hans-Helmut & Schmidt Reinhard H., 2016. "Corporate Governance of Banks – A German Alternative to the Standard Model," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 28(6), pages 427-444, December.
    4. Markus A. Höllerer, 2013. "From Taken-for-Granted to Explicit Commitment: The Rise of CSR in a Corporatist Country," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 573-606, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cnpexx:v:18:y:2013:i:1:p:89-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cnpe20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.