IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v20y2015i2p230-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixing Public and Private Uses in the Same Building: Opportunities and Barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Matti Siemiatycki

Abstract

This paper examines the opportunities and barriers to developing buildings that mix large-scale public, private and non-profit land uses within the same facility. Drawing on three case study projects from the City of Toronto, the paper shows how joint development buildings provide an opportunity to raise new money to deliver critical public use social infrastructure, are designed specifically to avoid conflicts between the partners, and involve partnerships structured to transfer construction and permitting risks between the partners. Despite the opportunities, the key barrier to the more widespread application of large-scale mixed-use buildings are the complex and lengthy planning and construction period for such projects, as well as the challenge finding ideal sites and partners with shared interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Matti Siemiatycki, 2015. "Mixing Public and Private Uses in the Same Building: Opportunities and Barriers," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 230-250, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:20:y:2015:i:2:p:230-250
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2015.1009012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2015.1009012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2015.1009012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cervero, Robert & Murakami, Jin, 2008. "Rail + Property Development: A model of sustainable transit finance and urbanism," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6jx3k35x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jaljolie, Ruba & Riekkinen, Kirsikka & Dalyot, Sagi, 2021. "A topological-based approach for determining spatial relationships of complex volumetric parcels in land administration systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Inbal Ben-Asher Gitler, 2022. "What’s in the Mix? Mixed-Use Architecture in the Post-World War II Years and Beyond," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 280-295.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Koncheva & Nikolay Zalesskiy, 2016. "Spatial Development of the Largest Russian Cities During the Post-Soviet Period: Orienting Towards Transit or Maintaining Soviet Trends," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/URB/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    3. Jinbao Zhao & Wei Deng & Yan Song & Yueran Zhu, 2014. "Analysis of Metro ridership at station level and station-to-station level in Nanjing: an approach based on direct demand models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 133-155, January.
    4. Aston, Laura & Currie, Graham & Kamruzzaman, Md. & Delbosc, Alexa & Teller, David, 2020. "Study design impacts on built environment and transit use research," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Singh, Yamini Jain & Fard, Pedram & Zuidgeest, Mark & Brussel, Mark & Maarseveen, Martin van, 2014. "Measuring transit oriented development: a spatial multi criteria assessment approach for the City Region Arnhem and Nijmegen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 130-143.
    6. Alexander Y. Ryzkov & Pavel Zuzin, 2016. "Urban Public Transport Development in Russia: Trends and Reforms," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/URB/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Jinkyung Choi & Yong Lee & Taewan Kim & Keemin Sohn, 2012. "An analysis of Metro ridership at the station-to-station level in Seoul," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 705-722, May.
    8. Xiaohuan Xie & Shiyu Qin & Zhonghua Gou & Ming Yi, 2020. "Can Green Building Promote Pro-Environmental Behaviours? The Psychological Model and Design Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Zhou, Nan & Price, Lynn & Yande, Dai & Creyts, Jon & Khanna, Nina & Fridley, David & Lu, Hongyou & Feng, Wei & Liu, Xu & Hasanbeigi, Ali & Tian, Zhiyu & Yang, Hongwei & Bai, Quan & Zhu, Yuezhong & Xio, 2019. "A roadmap for China to peak carbon dioxide emissions and achieve a 20% share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy by 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 793-819.
    10. Omar Alotaibi & Dimitris Potoglou, 2017. "Perspectives of travel strategies in light of the new metro and bus networks in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 4-27, January.
    11. Liang, Yue & Du, Mengbing & Wang, Xiangxiao & Xu, Xiwei, 2020. "Planning for urban life: A new approach of sustainable land use plan based on transit-oriented development," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Pittman Russell, 2017. "The Underappreciated Connection between Rail Restructuring Strategies and Financing," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 161-169, June.
    13. Caiyun Qian & Yang Zhou & Ze Ji & Qing Feng, 2018. "The Influence of the Built Environment of Neighborhoods on Residents’ Low-Carbon Travel Mode," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    14. Robert Cervero, 2009. "Transport Infrastructure and Global Competitiveness: Balancing Mobility and Livability," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 626(1), pages 210-225, November.
    15. Chang, Haoliang & Huang, Jianxiang & Yao, Weiran & Zhao, Weizun & Li, Lishuai, 2022. "How do new transit stations affect people's sentiment and activity? A case study based on social media data in Hong Kong," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 139-155.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:20:y:2015:i:2:p:230-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.