IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v16y2012i5p500-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new urban enclosures

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Hodkinson

Abstract

The ongoing crisis of global capitalism has served only to intensify the past four decades of neoliberal restructuring of cities across the world. In this paper I critically reflect on a literary aspect of the neoliberalising city academic discourse that is too often left untheorised or underplayed—the prevalence of contemporary urban enclosure. My aim is twofold: to synthesise theories of old and new enclosure with more familiar understandings of neoliberal urban processes; and to then apply this framework to the British housing experience of the past four decades. In doing so, I argue that enclosure is not only a metaphor for contemporary urban policy and processes but also provides an explanation for what is taking place. The paper concludes with some brief thoughts on how today's 'urban commoners’ might contest the new urban enclosures by finding common cause around visions and practices of a 'new urban commons’.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Hodkinson, 2012. "The new urban enclosures," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 500-518, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:16:y:2012:i:5:p:500-518
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2012.709403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2012.709403
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2012.709403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hills, 2007. "Ends and Means: The future roles of social housing in England," CASE Reports casereport34, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    2. Desiree Fields, 2017. "Unwilling Subjects of Financialization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 588-603, July.
    3. Jesús M. González-Pérez, 2022. "Evictions, Foreclosures, and Global Housing Speculation in Palma, Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Jorge Sequera & Jordi Nofre, 2020. "Touristification, transnational gentrification and urban change in Lisbon: The neighbourhood of Alfama," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3169-3189, November.
    5. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    6. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2021. "Contesting austerity, de-centring the state: Anti-politics and the political horizon of the urban," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 451-468, May.
    7. Tim Simpson, 2014. "Macau Metropolis and Mental Life: Interior Urbanism and the Chinese Imaginary," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 823-842, May.
    8. Zhao Zhang & Niamh Moore-Cherry & Declan Redmond, 2018. "A Crisis of Crisis Management? Evaluating Post-2010 Housing Restructuring in Nanjing, China," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 29-49, January.
    9. Lakshminarayan Satpati & Anwesha Haldar, 2021. "Neoliberal urban sustainability in Old Kolkata, India: Case studies of contested developments," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(6), pages 1825-1841, December.
    10. Simon Marvin & Jonathan Rutherford, 2018. "Controlled environments: An urban research agenda on microclimatic enclosure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1143-1162, May.
    11. Thomas S.J. Smith, 2020. "‘Stand back and watch us’: Post-capitalist practices in the maker movement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 593-610, May.
    12. Federico Savini, 2023. "Maintaining autonomy: Urban degrowth and the commoning of housing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 1231-1248, May.
    13. Beacon Mbiba, 2017. "Idioms of Accumulation: Corporate Accumulation by Dispossession in Urban Zimbabwe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 213-234, March.
    14. Mara Ferreri, 2020. "Painted Bullet Holes and Broken Promises: Understanding and Challenging Municipal Dispossession in London's Public Housing ‘Decanting’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1007-1022, November.
    15. Asunción Blanco-Romero & Macià Blázquez-Salom & Gemma Cànoves, 2018. "Barcelona, Housing Rent Bubble in a Tourist City. Social Responses and Local Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Ju Tjung Liong & Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard & Suryono Herlambang & Wahyu Astuti, 2020. "Space Grabs: Colonizing the Vertical City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1072-1082, November.
    17. Melissa Butcher & Luke Dickens, 2016. "Spatial Dislocation and Affective Displacement: Youth Perspectives on Gentrification in London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 800-816, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weinhardt, Felix, 2014. "Social housing, neighborhood quality and student performance," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 12-31.
    2. Gibbons, Stephen & Sanchez-Vidal, Maria & Silva, Olmo, 2020. "The bedroom tax," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Duncan Maclennan & Anthony O'Sullivan, 2013. "Localism, Devolution and Housing Policies," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 599-615, June.
    4. repec:pri:crcwel:wp09-24-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Suzanne Fitzpatrick & Hal Pawson, 2014. "Ending Security of Tenure for Social Renters: Transitioning to 'Ambulance Service' Social Housing?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 597-615, July.
    6. Justin van de Ven & Nicolas Hérault, 2019. "The evolution of tax implicit value judgements, redistribution and income inequality in the UK: 1968 to 2015," Working Papers 498, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    7. Allan Little, 2009. "Spatial Pattern of Economic Activity and Inactivity in Britain: People or Place Effects?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(7), pages 877-897.
    8. repec:cep:sticas:/131 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Alan Murie & Peter Williams, 2015. "A Presumption in Favour of Home Ownership? Reconsidering Housing Tenure Strategies," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 656-676, July.
    10. Chris Foye & David Clapham & Tommaso Gabrieli, 2018. "Home-ownership as a social norm and positional good: Subjective wellbeing evidence from panel data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1290-1312, May.
    11. Glen Bramley & David Watkins & Noah Kofi Karley, 2011. "An Outcome-Based Resource Allocation Model for Local Education Services in Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 848-871, October.
    12. ., 2014. "Residential segregation and people sorting within cities," Chapters, in: Urban Economics and Urban Policy, chapter 3, pages 54-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Jie Chen & Zan Yang & Ya Ping Wang, 2014. "The New Chinese Model of Public Housing: A Step Forward or Backward?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 534-550, June.
    14. Power, Anne, 2008. "Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4487-4501, December.
    15. Hal Pawson & Moira Munro, 2010. "Explaining Tenancy Sustainment Rates in British Social Rented Housing: The Roles of Management, Vulnerability and Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 145-168, January.
    16. Eleonora Patacchini & Yves Zenou, 2011. "Neighborhood Effects And Parental Involvement In The Intergenerational Transmission Of Education," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 987-1013, December.
    17. Obolenskaya, Polina & Burchardt, Tania, 2016. "Public and private welfare activity in England," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86454, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Anita Ratcliffe, 2010. "Housing wealth or economic climate: Why do house prices matter for well-being?," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 10/234, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    19. Kitty Stewart, 2007. "Employment trajectories for mothers in low-skilled work: Evidence from the British Lone Parent Cohort," CASE Papers case122, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    20. James Midgley, 2008. "Welfare Reform in the United States: Implications for British Social Policy (with commentaries by Kitty Stewart, David Piachaud and Howard Glennerster)," CASE Papers case131, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    21. Stewart, Kitty, 2007. "Employment trajectories for mothers in low-skilled work: evidence from the British lone parent cohort," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6215, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Tania Burchardt & Polina Obolenskaya, 2016. "Public and Private Welfare Activity in England," CASE Papers /193, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:16:y:2012:i:5:p:500-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.