IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirc/v42y2024i6p1026-1044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Politics of “waiting for transformation†in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Deniz Ay
  • Mehmet Penpecioglu

Abstract

This paper explores the politics of ‘waiting’ as a mode of governance in large-scale urban redevelopment projects. In designated renewal areas, residents/landowners are often subject to several episodes of waiting: waiting for the public authority for information on redevelopment visions; waiting for the plans and projects to become public; waiting for the court ruling if they appeal the plans; waiting for demolition upon plan approvals; and, finally, waiting for the constructions to be completed. Given the complexity of actors and institutions involved in the waiting, it becomes a conflictual political process. This prolonged waiting leads to an ongoing temporariness and precarious spaces of urban renewal. The course of waiting affects the reorganization of the city space “ now †and in the future. We analyze two protracted urban renewal projects from Turkey, Fikirtepe in Istanbul and Karabaglar in Izmir, to explore how residents’ decade-long waiting for urban change are shaped and how these diverse waiting experiences lead to different outcomes for the progression of the state-imposed urban renewal agendas. While Karabaglar residents have unified around active bottom-up resistance from the beginning to challenge the project-based plans the central government imposed, Fikirtepe residents pursued individual-level negotiations with developers to maximize private returns following the zoning incentives the public authority gave. Despite the socio-spatial similarities between these designated urban renewal project sites, variances in residents’ collective waiting strategies have led to different urban politics around project-based urban change.

Suggested Citation

  • Deniz Ay & Mehmet Penpecioglu, 2024. "Politics of “waiting for transformation†in protracted urban renewal projects in Turkey," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(6), pages 1026-1044, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:6:p:1026-1044
    DOI: 10.1177/23996544231222138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23996544231222138
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23996544231222138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozan Karaman, 2013. "Urban Renewal in I stanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 715-733, March.
    2. Stuart Hodkinson, 2012. "The new urban enclosures," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 500-518, October.
    3. Asuman Türkün, 2011. "Urban Regeneration and Hegemonic Power Relationships," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 61-72, February.
    4. Weber, Rachel, 2015. "From Boom to Bubble," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226294483, August.
    5. Yunpeng Zhang, 2022. "TEMPORAL POLITICS AND INJUSTICE IN MEGA URBANIZATION: Lessons from Yangzhou, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 558-575, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    2. David Ley, 2021. "A regional growth ecology, a great wall of capital and a metropolitan housing market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(2), pages 297-315, February.
    3. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    4. Stephanie Farmer & Chris D Poulos, 2019. "The financialising local growth machine in Chicago," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(7), pages 1404-1425, May.
    5. Antoine Guironnet, 2019. "Cities on the global real estate marketplace: urban development policy and the circulation of financial standards in two French localities," Post-Print halshs-02297204, HAL.
    6. Julia Heslop & Josh Chambers & James Maloney & George Spurgeon & Hannah Swainston & Hannah Woodall, 2023. "Re-contextualising purpose-built student accommodation in secondary cities: The role of planning policy, consultation and economic need during austerity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 923-940, April.
    7. Susan Fainstein, 2016. "Financialisation and justice in the city: A commentary," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(7), pages 1503-1508, May.
    8. Frances Brill, 2020. "Complexity and coordination in London’s Silvertown Quays: How real estate developers (re)centred themselves in the planning process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 362-382, March.
    9. Callum Ward, 2021. "Contradictions of Financial Capital Switching: Reading the Corporate Leverage Crisis through The Port of Liverpool's Whole Business Securitization," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 249-265, March.
    10. Renee Tapp, 2021. "Introducing the YIMBYs: Renters, housing, and supply-side politics in Los Angeles," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(7), pages 1511-1528, November.
    11. Thomas S.J. Smith, 2020. "‘Stand back and watch us’: Post-capitalist practices in the maker movement," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(3), pages 593-610, May.
    12. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    13. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Ali Kerem Saysel & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton, 2020. "From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 637-653, June.
    14. Simon Marvin & Jonathan Rutherford, 2018. "Controlled environments: An urban research agenda on microclimatic enclosure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(6), pages 1143-1162, May.
    15. Marcus Hübscher, 2021. "Megaprojects, Gentrification, and Tourism. A Systematic Review on Intertwined Phenomena," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Cheng Liu & Weixuan Song & Yunpeng Zhang, 2024. "Is China Making the Rent Gap Theory Untrue? Lessons from Nanjing," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 115(1), pages 96-111, February.
    17. : Bridget Fisher & Flávia Leite, 2018. "The Cost of New York City's Hudson Yards Redevelopment Project," SCEPA working paper series. 2018-02, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    18. Beacon Mbiba, 2017. "Idioms of Accumulation: Corporate Accumulation by Dispossession in Urban Zimbabwe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 213-234, March.
    19. Laura Wolf-Powers, 2024. "Dilemmas of 21st century land value capture: Examining Henry George’s legacy in a new Gilded Age," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(6), pages 1738-1752, September.
    20. Jorge Sequera & Jordi Nofre, 2020. "Touristification, transnational gentrification and urban change in Lisbon: The neighbourhood of Alfama," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(15), pages 3169-3189, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirc:v:42:y:2024:i:6:p:1026-1044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.