IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v28y2013i2p163-176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neighbourhood Restructuring and Residential Relocation: Towards a Balanced Perspective on Relocation Processes and Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Reinout Kleinhans
  • Ade Kearns

Abstract

This introductory paper to this special issue of Housing Studies questions whether various characteristics of the debate and research on gentrification, displacement and restructuring justify a largely negative perspective on the processes and outcomes of 'forced' residential relocation. We argue that a proper and fuller consideration of issues around policy, context, process and outcomes enable researchers and commentators to avoid ready characterisations and self-fulfilling investigations of restructuring which serve to present it as a singular (and somewhat suspicious or conspiratorial) phenomenon. For this purpose, we present a broad conceptual framework for restructuring and relocation studies, based on these four themes. Subsequently, we review major issues in restructuring and gentrification discourses, and briefly reflect upon some of the factors underlying the negative loading of the term displacement. We also identify caveats in the evidence base of relocation studies, both in the United States and in Europe. Finally, we introduce the papers in this special issue. The overall aim of this issue is to offer a more open, balanced starting position for analysis of urban restructuring processes and relocation outcomes, particularly in relation to areas of social housing.

Suggested Citation

  • Reinout Kleinhans & Ade Kearns, 2013. "Neighbourhood Restructuring and Residential Relocation: Towards a Balanced Perspective on Relocation Processes and Outcomes," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 163-176, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:28:y:2013:i:2:p:163-176
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2013.768001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2013.768001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2013.768001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Lelevrier, 2013. "Forced Relocation in France: How Residential Trajectories Affect Individual Experiences," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 253-271, March.
    2. Deirdre Oakley & Erin Ruel & Lesley Reid, 2013. "Atlanta's Last Demolitions and Relocations: The Relationship Between Neighborhood Characteristics and Resident Satisfaction," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 205-234, March.
    3. Ade Kearns & Phil Mason, 2013. "Defining and Measuring Displacement: Is Relocation from Restructured Neighbourhoods Always Unwelcome and Disruptive?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 177-204, March.
    4. David Varady & Reinout Kleinhans, 2013. "Relocation Counselling and Supportive Services as Tools to Prevent Negative Spillover Effects: A Review," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 317-337, March.
    5. Kirsten Visser & Gideon Bolt & Ronald van Kempen, 2013. "Urban Restructuring and Forced Relocations: Housing Opportunities for Youth? A Case Study in Utrecht, the Netherlands," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 294-316, March.
    6. Edward G. Goetz, 2013. "Too Good to be True? The Variable and Contingent Benefits of Displacement and Relocation among Low-Income Public Housing Residents," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 235-252, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xizan Jin & Tachia Chin & Junli Yu & Yanjiang Zhang & Yingshuang Shi, 2020. "How Government’s Policy Implementation Methods Influence Urban Villagers’ Acceptance of Urban Revitalization Programs: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Blohm, Frederikke Sissel & Nygaard, Siv Steffen & Jørgensen, Terese Sara Høj & Lund, Rikke, 2024. "Structural changes in a Danish social housing area: The impact of forced permanent rehousing on contact frequency with general practitioner and use of antidepressants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    3. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    4. Zwiers, Merle & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2015. "Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands," IZA Discussion Papers 8882, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    6. Li, Xin & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2017. "Ambivalence in Place Attachment: The Lived Experiences of Residents in Declining Neighbourhoods Facing Demolition in Shenyang, China," IZA Discussion Papers 10515, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng Wang & Jie Shen & Xiang Luo, 2023. "Can residents regain their community relations after resettlement? Insights from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(5), pages 962-980, April.
    2. Li, Xin & Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2017. "Ambivalence in Place Attachment: The Lived Experiences of Residents in Declining Neighbourhoods Facing Demolition in Shenyang, China," IZA Discussion Papers 10515, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Sue Easton & Loretta Lees & Phil Hubbard & Nicholas Tate, 2020. "Measuring and mapping displacement: The problem of quantification in the battle against gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 286-306, February.
    4. Porter, Libby & Davies, Liam & Ruming, Kristian & Kelly, David & Rogers, Dallas & Flanagan, Kathleen, 2023. "Understanding the drivers and outcomes of public housing tenant relocation," SocArXiv k6ht3, Center for Open Science.
    5. Jinliu Chen & Paola Pellegrini & Haoqi Wang, 2022. "Comparative Residents’ Satisfaction Evaluation for Socially Sustainable Regeneration—The Case of Two High-Density Communities in Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Thorning, Daniel & Balch, Christopher & Essex, Stephen, 2019. "The delivery of mixed communities in the regeneration of urban waterfronts: An investigation of the comparative experience of Plymouth and Bristol," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 238-251.
    7. Mehdipanah, Roshanak & Manzano, Ana & Borrell, Carme & Malmusi, Davide & Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica & Greenhalgh, Joanne & Muntaner, Carles & Pawson, Ray, 2015. "Exploring complex causal pathways between urban renewal, health and health inequality using a theory-driven realist approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 266-274.
    8. Renee Gordon & Francis L. Collins & Robin Kearns, 2017. "‘It is the People that Have Made Glen Innes’: State-led Gentrification and the Reconfiguration of Urban Life in Auckland," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 767-785, September.
    9. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    10. Jane Rongerude & Mônica Haddad, 2016. "Cores and Peripheries: Spatial Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher Distribution in the San Francisco Bay Area Region, 2000--2010," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 417-436, May.
    11. Leccis, Francesca, 2019. "Regeneration programmes: Enforcing the right to housing or fostering gentrification? The example of Bankside in London," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Monica S. Ruiz & Allison Williams & Allison O’Rourke & Elizabeth MacIntosh & Shareese Moné & Cyndee Clay, 2022. "The Impact of Housing Insecurity on Access to Care and Services among People Who Use Drugs in Washington, DC," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Fenne M Pinkster & Matthieu Permentier & Karin Wittebrood, 2014. "Moving Considerations of Middle-Class Residents in Dutch Disadvantaged Neighborhoods: Exploring the Relationship between Disorder and Attachment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2898-2914, December.
    14. Blohm, Frederikke Sissel & Nygaard, Siv Steffen & Jørgensen, Terese Sara Høj & Lund, Rikke, 2024. "Structural changes in a Danish social housing area: The impact of forced permanent rehousing on contact frequency with general practitioner and use of antidepressants," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    15. Fenglong Wang & Donggen Wang, 2020. "Changes in residential satisfaction after home relocation: A longitudinal study in Beijing, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 583-601, February.
    16. Kleinhans, Reinout & Veldboer, Lex & Jansen, Sylvia & van Ham, Maarten, 2014. "Ageing in a Long-term Regeneration Neighbourhood: A Disruptive Experience or Successful Ageing in Place?," IZA Discussion Papers 8660, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Jiang, Wen & Feng, Tao & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2020. "Latent class path model of intention to move house," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Kirsten Visser & Gideon Bolt & Ronald van Kempen, 2014. "Out of Place? The Effects of Demolition on Youths’ Social Contacts and Leisure Activities—A Case Study in Utrecht, the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(1), pages 203-219, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:28:y:2013:i:2:p:163-176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.