IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apmtfi/v5y1998i2p131-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coupling backward induction with Monte Carlo simulations: a fast Fourier transform (FFT) approach

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Rebonato
  • Ian Cooper

Abstract

This note presents a simple, robust and computationally efficient way to calculate expectations of arbitrary future payoffs within the context of a Monte Carlo forward-induction methodology. The technique complements existing approximation techniques: while virtually all existing approximation methodologies remain approximate irrespective of the computational effort, the technique presented here has the desirable feature of being asymptotically 'correct', as long as 'weak' convergence in distribution is required. The proposed technique is applicable for the evaluation of both American options and compound options. The paper uses the fast Fourier transform (FFT) to evaluate along a simulated path the expectation of future pay-offs for an American option, conditional on the optimal exercise strategy. This technique can recover in a single pass the value function for a particular option across a wide range of values of the state variable and all future dates up to the maturity of the option. An example is given for a single state variable following a Markov process. The technique is shown to be fast and accurate in recovering both values and hedge ratios. The extension to several variables is straightforward.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Rebonato & Ian Cooper, 1998. "Coupling backward induction with Monte Carlo simulations: a fast Fourier transform (FFT) approach," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 131-141.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:5:y:1998:i:2:p:131-141
    DOI: 10.1080/135048698334691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135048698334691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/135048698334691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Heath & Robert Jarrow & Andrew Morton, 2008. "Bond Pricing And The Term Structure Of Interest Rates: A New Methodology For Contingent Claims Valuation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 13, pages 277-305, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    3. Li, Anlong & Ritchken, Peter & Sankarasubramanian, L, 1995. "Lattice Models for Pricing American Interest Rate Claims," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(2), pages 719-737, June.
    4. Spassimir H. Paskov & Joseph F. Traub, 1995. "Faster Valuation of Financial Derivatives," Working Papers 95-03-034, Santa Fe Institute.
    5. Robert A. Jarrow & Arkadev Chatterjea, 2019. "The Heath–Jarrow–Morton Libor Model," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: An Introduction to Derivative Securities, Financial Markets, and Risk Management, chapter 25, pages 618-654, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Barraquand, Jérôme & Martineau, Didier, 1995. "Numerical Valuation of High Dimensional Multivariate American Securities," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 383-405, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pellizzari, P., 2005. "Static hedging of multivariate derivatives by simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 507-519, October.
    2. Pizzi Claudio & Pellizzari Paolo, 2002. "Monte Carlo Pricing of American Options Using Nonparametric Regression," Finance 0207007, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Mar 2003.
    3. Feng, Chengxiao & Tan, Jie & Jiang, Zhenyu & Chen, Shuang, 2020. "A generalized European option pricing model with risk management," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ingo Beyna, 2013. "Interest Rate Derivatives," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-34925-6, February.
    2. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    3. Chiarella, Carl & Clewlow, Les & Musti, Silvana, 2005. "A volatility decomposition control variate technique for Monte Carlo simulations of Heath Jarrow Morton models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 325-336, March.
    4. Marat Kramin & Saikat Nandi & Alexander Shulman, 2008. "A multi-factor Markovian HJM model for pricing American interest rate derivatives," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 359-378, November.
    5. Mark Broadie & Jérôme Detemple, 1996. "Recent Advances in Numerical Methods for Pricing Derivative Securities," CIRANO Working Papers 96s-17, CIRANO.
    6. Marat Kramin & Timur Kramin & Stephen Young & Venkat Dharan, 2005. "A Simple Induction Approach and an Efficient Trinomial Lattice for Multi-State Variable Interest Rate Derivatives Models," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 199-226, January.
    7. Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Pricing American-style securities using simulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1323-1352, June.
    8. Ravi Kashyap, 2022. "Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1175-1215, August.
    9. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    10. Ravi Kashyap, 2016. "Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory," Papers 1609.01274, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    11. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    12. Lars Stentoft, 2004. "Convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo Approach to American Option Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1193-1203, September.
    13. Lin, Chung-Gee & Yang, Wei-Ning & Chen, Shu-Chuan, 2014. "Analyses of retirement benefits with options," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 130-135.
    14. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    15. Georges Dionne & Geneviève Gauthier & Nadia Ouertani, 2009. "Basket Options on Heterogeneous Underlying Assets," Cahiers de recherche 0918, CIRPEE.
    16. Manuel Moreno & Javier Navas, 2003. "On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 107-128, May.
    17. Zhang, Kun & Liu, Jing & Wang, Erkang & Wang, Jin, 2017. "Quantifying risks with exact analytical solutions of derivative pricing distribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 757-766.
    18. Dimitrakopoulos, Roussos G. & Abdel Sabour, Sabry A., 2007. "Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: Can the real options make a difference?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 116-125, September.
    19. Robert R. Bliss & Peter H. Ritchken, 1995. "Empirical tests of two state-variable HJM models," FRB Atlanta Working Paper 95-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
    20. Fabio Mercurio & Juan Moraleda, 2001. "A family of humped volatility models," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 93-116.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:5:y:1998:i:2:p:131-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.