IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apmtfi/v14y2007i5p437-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convex Hedging in Incomplete Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Birgit Rudloff

Abstract

In incomplete financial markets not every contingent claim can be replicated by a self-financing strategy. The risk of the resulting shortfall can be measured by convex risk measures, recently introduced by Follmer and Schied (2002). The dynamic optimization problem of finding a self-financing strategy that minimizes the convex risk of the shortfall can be split into a static optimization problem and a representation problem. It follows that the optimal strategy consists in superhedging the modified claim [image omitted] , where H is the payoff of the claim and [image omitted] is a solution of the static optimization problem, an optimal randomized test. In this paper, necessary and sufficient optimality conditions are deduced for the static problem using convex duality methods. The solution of the static optimization problem turns out to be a randomized test with a typical 0-1-structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Birgit Rudloff, 2007. "Convex Hedging in Incomplete Markets," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 437-452.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:14:y:2007:i:5:p:437-452
    DOI: 10.1080/13504860701352206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13504860701352206
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504860701352206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hirbod Assa & Nikolay Gospodinov, 2017. "A Robust Approach to Hedging and Pricing in Imperfect Markets," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Li, Jing & Xu, Mingxin, 2009. "Minimizing Conditional Value-at-Risk under Constraint on Expected Value," MPRA Paper 26342, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Oct 2010.
    3. Barski Michał, 2016. "On the shortfall risk control: A refinement of the quantile hedging method," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 32(2), pages 125-141, March.
    4. Raimund M. Kovacevic, 2019. "Valuation and pricing of electricity delivery contracts: the producer’s view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 421-460, April.
    5. Ilhan, Aytaç & Jonsson, Mattias & Sircar, Ronnie, 2009. "Optimal static-dynamic hedges for exotic options under convex risk measures," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 119(10), pages 3608-3632, October.
    6. Zhenyu Cui & Jun Deng, 2018. "Shortfall risk through Fenchel duality," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(02), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Marcelo Righi, 2024. "Optimal hedging with variational preferences under convex risk measures," Papers 2407.03431, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    8. Jing Li & Mingxin Xu, 2013. "Optimal Dynamic Portfolio with Mean-CVaR Criterion," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-29, November.
    9. Tim Leung & Qingshuo Song & Jie Yang, 2013. "Outperformance portfolio optimization via the equivalence of pure and randomized hypothesis testing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 839-870, October.
    10. Micha{l} Barski, 2014. "On the shortfall risk control -- a refinement of the quantile hedging method," Papers 1402.3725, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2015.
    11. Ludovic Tangpi, 2018. "Efficient hedging under ambiguity in continuous time," Papers 1812.10876, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    12. L. Rüschendorf & Steven Vanduffel, 2020. "On the construction of optimal payoffs," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(1), pages 129-153, June.
    13. Mustafa Ç. Pinar, 2010. "Buyer's quantile hedge portfolios in discrete-time trading," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 729-738, October.
    14. Martin Glanzer & Georg Ch. Pflug & Alois Pichler, 2017. "Incorporating statistical model error into the calculation of acceptability prices of contingent claims," Papers 1703.05709, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    15. Tomasz Tkalinski, 2014. "Convex hedging of non-superreplicable claims in discrete-time market models," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 79(2), pages 239-252, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:14:y:2007:i:5:p:437-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.