IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v69y2015i4p266-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mere Renovation is Too Little Too Late: We Need to Rethink our Undergraduate Curriculum from the Ground Up

Author

Listed:
  • George Cobb

Abstract

The last half-dozen years have seen The American Statistician publish well-argued and provocative calls to change our thinking about statistics and how we teach it, among them Brown and Kass, Nolan and Temple-Lang, and Legler et al. Within this past year, the ASA has issued a new and comprehensive set of guidelines for undergraduate programs (ASA, Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Programs in Statistical Science ). Accepting (and applauding) all this as background, the current article argues the need to rethink our curriculum from the ground up, and offers five principles and two caveats intended to help us along the path toward a new synthesis. These principles and caveats rest on my sense of three parallel evolutions: the convergence of trends in the roles of mathematics, computation, and context within statistics education. These ongoing changes, together with the articles cited above and the seminal provocation by Leo Breiman call for a deep rethinking of what we teach to undergraduates. In particular, following Brown and Kass, we should put priority on two goals, to make “fundamental concepts accessible” and to “minimize prerequisites to research.”[Received December 2014. Revised July 2015]

Suggested Citation

  • George Cobb, 2015. "Mere Renovation is Too Little Too Late: We Need to Rethink our Undergraduate Curriculum from the Ground Up," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 266-282, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:69:y:2015:i:4:p:266-282
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1093029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2015.1093029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2015.1093029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2017. "Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 209-219, July.
    2. Jeff Witmer, 2017. "Bayes and MCMC for Undergraduates," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 259-264, July.
    3. Ryan Sterling McCulloch, 2017. "Learning Outcomes in a Laboratory Environment vs. Classroom for Statistics Instruction: An Alternative Approach Using Statistical Software," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(5), pages 131-131, October.
    4. Chris J. Wild, 2016. "Discussion: Locating Statistics in the World of Finding Out," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 194-202, August.
    5. Amy L. Phelps & Kathryn A. Szabat, 2017. "The Current Landscape of Teaching Analytics to Business Students at Institutions of Higher Education: Who is Teaching What?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 155-161, April.
    6. Robert A. Stine, 2017. "Explaining Normal Quantile-Quantile Plots Through Animation: The Water-Filling Analogy," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 145-147, April.
    7. Manuela Svoboda, 2022. "Evaluation of Motivation, Expectation, and Present Situation in 3rd Year Undergraduate Students of German Language and Literature at the University of Rijeka, Croatia," European Journal of Education Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejed_v5_i.
    8. Nicholas Jon Horton, 2016. "Discussion: Making Progress in a Crowded Market," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(2), pages 179-181, August.
    9. Daniel Kaplan, 2018. "Teaching Stats for Data Science," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 89-96, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:69:y:2015:i:4:p:266-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.