IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v67y2013i4p205-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejoinder

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Lum
  • Megan Emily Price
  • David Banks

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Lum & Megan Emily Price & David Banks, 2013. "Rejoinder," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 205-206, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:4:p:205-206
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2013.855109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2013.855109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2013.855109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauricio Sadinle & Stephen E. Fienberg, 2013. "A Generalized Fellegi--Sunter Framework for Multiple Record Linkage With Application to Homicide Record Systems," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(502), pages 385-397, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel H. Weinberg & John M. Abowd & Robert F. Belli & Noel Cressie & David C. Folch & Scott H. Holan & Margaret C. Levenstein & Kristen M. Olson & Jerome P. Reiter & Matthew D. Shapiro & Jolene Smyth, 2017. "Effects of a Government-Academic Partnership: Has the NSF-Census Bureau Research Network Helped Improve the U.S. Statistical System?," Working Papers 17-59r, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    2. Michael Scholz & Markus Franz & Oliver Hinz, 2016. "The Ambiguous Identifier Clustering Technique," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 143-156, May.
    3. Ventura, Samuel L. & Nugent, Rebecca & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2015. "Seeing the non-stars: (Some) sources of bias in past disambiguation approaches and a new public tool leveraging labeled records," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 1672-1701.
    4. Holmberg Anders, 2015. "Discussion," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 515-525, September.
    5. Thomas Stringham, 2022. "Fast Bayesian Record Linkage With Record-Specific Disagreement Parameters," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1509-1522, October.
    6. Duncan Smith, 2020. "Re‐identification in the Absence of Common Variables for Matching," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 354-379, August.
    7. Pascal Cuxac & Jean-Charles Lamirel & Valerie Bonvallot, 2013. "Efficient supervised and semi-supervised approaches for affiliations disambiguation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(1), pages 47-58, October.
    8. Bakker Bart F.M. & Heijden Peter G.M. van der & Scholtus Sander, 2015. "Preface," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 349-355, September.
    9. Betancourt, Brenda & Sosa, Juan & Rodríguez, Abel, 2022. "A prior for record linkage based on allelic partitions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    10. Bera Sabyasachi & Chatterjee Snigdhansu, 2020. "High dimensional, robust, unsupervised record linkage," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 123-143, August.
    11. Di Consiglio Loredana & Tuoto Tiziana, 2018. "Population Size Estimation and Linkage Errors: the Multiple Lists Case," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(4), pages 889-908, December.
    12. Sabyasachi Bera & Snigdhansu Chatterjee, 2020. "High dimensional, robust, unsupervised record linkage," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 123-143, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:67:y:2013:i:4:p:205-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.