IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v34y2018i4p889-908n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Size Estimation and Linkage Errors: the Multiple Lists Case

Author

Listed:
  • Di Consiglio Loredana

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat), via Balbo 16, 00184Roma, Italy.)

  • Tuoto Tiziana

    (Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat), via Balbo 16, 00184Roma, Italy.)

Abstract

Data integration is now common practice in official statistics and involves an increasing number of sources. When using multiple sources, an objective is to assess the unknown size of the population. To this aim, capture-recapture methods are applied. Standard capture-recapture methods are based on a number of strong assumptions, including the absence of errors in the integration procedures. However, in particular when the integrated sources were not originally collected for statistical purposes, this assumption is unlikely and linkage errors (false links and missing links) may occur. In this article, the problem of adjusting population estimates in the presence of linkage errors in multiple lists is tackled; under homogeneous linkage error probabilities assumption, a solution is proposed in a realistic and practical scenario of multiple lists linkage procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Di Consiglio Loredana & Tuoto Tiziana, 2018. "Population Size Estimation and Linkage Errors: the Multiple Lists Case," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 34(4), pages 889-908, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:34:y:2018:i:4:p:889-908:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2018-0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2018-0044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brent A. Coull & Alan Agresti, 1999. "The Use of Mixed Logit Models to Reflect Heterogeneity in Capture-Recapture Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 294-301, March.
    2. Mauricio Sadinle & Stephen E. Fienberg, 2013. "A Generalized Fellegi--Sunter Framework for Multiple Record Linkage With Application to Homicide Record Systems," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(502), pages 385-397, June.
    3. Di Consiglio Loredana & Tuoto Tiziana, 2015. "Coverage Evaluation on Probabilistically Linked Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 415-429, September.
    4. Alessio Farcomeni & Luca Tardella, 2010. "Reference Bayesian methods for recapture models with heterogeneity," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 187-208, May.
    5. William A. Link & Jun Yoshizaki & Larissa L. Bailey & Kenneth H. Pollock, 2010. "Uncovering a Latent Multinomial: Analysis of Mark–Recapture Data with Misidentification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 178-185, March.
    6. Bartolucci, Francesco & Forcina, Antonio, 2006. "A Class of Latent Marginal Models for CaptureRecapture Data With Continuous Covariates," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 786-794, June.
    7. Stephen Fienberg & Daniel Manrique-Vallier, 2009. "Integrated methodology for multiple systems estimation and record linkage using a missing data formulation," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 93(1), pages 49-60, March.
    8. Alan J. Lee & George A. F. Seber & Jennifer K. Holden & John T. Huakau, 2001. "Capture–Recapture, Epidemiology, and List Mismatches: Several Lists," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 707-713, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Latent class recapture models with flexible behavioural response," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 75(1), pages 5-17.
    2. Di Consiglio Loredana & Tuoto Tiziana, 2015. "Coverage Evaluation on Probabilistically Linked Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 415-429, September.
    3. Francesco Bartolucci & Fulvia Pennoni, 2007. "A Class of Latent Markov Models for Capture–Recapture Data Allowing for Time, Heterogeneity, and Behavior Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 568-578, June.
    4. Danilo Alunni Fegatelli & Luca Tardella, 2016. "Flexible behavioral capture–recapture modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 125-135, March.
    5. Shira Mitchell & Al Ozonoff & Alan M. Zaslavsky & Bethany Hedt-Gauthier & Kristian Lum & Brent A. Coull, 2013. "A Comparison of Marginal and Conditional Models for Capture–Recapture Data with Application to Human Rights Violations Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1022-1032, December.
    6. Baffour Bernard & Brown James J. & Smith Peter W.F., 2021. "Latent Class Analysis for Estimating an Unknown Population Size – with Application to Censuses," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 673-697, September.
    7. Mevin B. Hooten & Michael R. Schwob & Devin S. Johnson & Jacob S. Ivan, 2023. "Multistage hierarchical capture–recapture models," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), September.
    8. Brent A. Coull & Alan Agresti, 2000. "Random Effects Modeling of Multiple Binomial Responses Using the Multivariate Binomial Logit-Normal Distribution," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 73-80, March.
    9. Ben C. Stevenson & Rachel M. Fewster & Koustubh Sharma, 2022. "Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 963-973, September.
    10. Forcina, Antonio, 2008. "Identifiability of extended latent class models with individual covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5263-5268, August.
    11. Bakker Bart F.M. & Heijden Peter G.M. van der & Scholtus Sander, 2015. "Preface," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 349-355, September.
    12. Francesco Bartolucci & Antonio Forcina, 2001. "Analysis of Capture-Recapture Data with a Rasch-Type Model Allowing for Conditional Dependence and Multidimensionality," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 714-719, September.
    13. Chang Xu & Dongchu Sun & Chong He, 2014. "Objective Bayesian analysis for a capture–recapture model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(2), pages 245-278, April.
    14. J. Andrew Royle, 2009. "Analysis of Capture–Recapture Models with Individual Covariates Using Data Augmentation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 267-274, March.
    15. R. M. Fewster, 2017. "Some applications of genetics in statistical ecology," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(4), pages 349-379, October.
    16. Kristian Lum & Megan Emily Price & David Banks, 2013. "Rejoinder," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(4), pages 205-206, November.
    17. Dardanoni, V & Li Donni, P, 2008. "Testing For Asymmetric Information In Insurance Markets With Unobservable Types," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 08/26, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    18. Hwang, Sam Il Myoung & Squires, Munir, 2024. "Linked samples and measurement error in historical US census data," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Janne Petersen & Karen Bandeen-Roche & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Klaus Groes Larsen, 2012. "Predicting Latent Class Scores for Subsequent Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 244-262, April.
    20. Bacci, Silvia & Bartolucci, Francesco & Pieroni, Luca, 2012. "A causal analysis of mother’s education on birth inequalities," MPRA Paper 38754, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:34:y:2018:i:4:p:889-908:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.