IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/alresp/v1y2004i1p63-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Action learning and organizational learning: power, politics and emotion in organizations1

Author

Listed:
  • Russ Vince

Abstract

The theme of this paper is a discussion of the relationship between action learning and organizational learning. The main argument is that action learning has been understood in terms of the impact that it can have within the organization, and that, in addition, it is important to ask—what is the impact of organization on action learning? The benefit of this shift of focus is that action learning can be seen as an organizing process as well as a learning process. Action learning is likely to be concerned with individuals' responsibilities to solve key organizational problems, but it is also possible to set this task firmly alongside an engagement with existing organizational dynamics and power relations mobilised by attempts at learning, and the influence they inevitably have on the outcomes of learning. To understand this shift it is necessary to examine the emotions and politics that create and are created through organizational dynamics. Short examples from both private and public sector organizations are used to illustrate the arguments. These arguments are related to developments in the theory of action learning through an additional component to the original action learning formula. ‘Organizing insight’ provides a link between action learning and organizational learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Russ Vince, 2004. "Action learning and organizational learning: power, politics and emotion in organizations1," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 63-78, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:63-78
    DOI: 10.1080/1476733042000187628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1476733042000187628
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1476733042000187628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krystyna Weinstein, 2002. "Action Learning: The Classic Approach," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Yury Boshyk (ed.), Action Learning Worldwide, chapter 1, pages 3-18, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russ Vince, 2012. "The contradictions of impact: action learning and power in organizations," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 209-218, August.
    2. George Boak, 2016. "Enabling team learning in healthcare," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 101-117, July.
    3. Pauline Joyce & Paula Kinnarney, 2014. "Leading change as a professional: working across boundaries," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 167-178, July.
    4. Aileen Corley & Ann Thorne, 2006. "Action learning: avoiding conflict or enabling action," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(01), pages 31-44.
    5. Mary Holmes, 2010. "Team Challenge and action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 221-227, April.
    6. Mike Pedler & Bernhard Hauser & Ghislaine Caulat, 2014. "Reflections on working with virtual action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 88-97, March.
    7. The Editors, 2006. "Book reviews," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(01), pages 107-122.
    8. Ian Lovegrove, 2014. "Ethics for managers: philosophical foundations and business realities," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 113-118, March.
    9. Ulrike Burger & Kiran Trehan, 2018. "Action learning in East Africa: new encounters or impossible challenges?," Action Learning: Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 126-138, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:alresp:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:63-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CALR20 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.