IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v37y2007is1p63-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does changing measurement change management behaviour? A review of the evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Beatty

Abstract

The effect of a change in accounting standards on reporting firms' economic behaviour is often a concern raised by those opposing the accounting change. Some view these changes in behaviour as an inevitable consequence of a rule change. Others are not persuaded by these arguments. Although the empirical evidence of changes in economic behaviour is not extensive, it is consistent with accounting changes resulting in firms changing both operating and financing decisions. The evidence of which economic incentives give rise to these changes is more limited. Changes in economic behaviour appear consistently to be related to the regulatory use of accounting numbers. In addition, some evidence related to incentives created by management compensation and by market discipline has been found. Evidence of the importance of debt covenants in inducing accounting changes is less convincing given limited examination of actual debt contracts and the use of poor proxies of covenant slack. The existing research does little to tell us whether any changes in behaviour are for the better or for the worse.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Beatty, 2007. "How does changing measurement change management behaviour? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(S1), pages 63-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:37:y:2007:i:s1:p:63-71
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2007.9730086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham, John R. & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shiva, 2005. "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 3-73, December.
    2. Horwitz, Bn & Kolodny, R, 1980. "The Economic-Effects Of Involuntary Uniformity In The Financial-Reporting Of R And D Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18, pages 38-74.
    3. Beattie, Vivien & Goodacre, Alan & Thomson, Sarah Jane, 2006. "International lease-accounting reform and economic consequences: The views of U.K. users and preparers," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 75-103.
    4. Imhoff, E.A. & Thomas, J.K., 1988. "Economic Consequences Of Accounting Standards: The Lease Disclosure Rule Change," Papers fb-_88-36, Columbia - Graduate School of Business.
    5. Ilia D. Dichev & Douglas J. Skinner, 2002. "Large–Sample Evidence on the Debt Covenant Hypothesis," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 1091-1123, September.
    6. Vivien Beattie & Keith Edwards & Alan Goodacre, 1998. "The impact of constructive operating lease capitalisation on key accounting ratios," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 233-254.
    7. Beatty, Anne & Ramesh, K. & Weber, Joseph, 2002. "The importance of accounting changes in debt contracts: the cost of flexibility in covenant calculations," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 205-227, June.
    8. Dukes, Re & Dyckman, Tr & Elliott, Ja, 1980. "Accounting For Research And Development Costs - The Impact On Research And Development Expenditures," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18, pages 1-26.
    9. Elliott, J & Richardson, G & Dyckman, T & Dukes, R, 1984. "The Impact Of Sfas No-2 On Firm Expenditures On Research And Development - Replications And Extensions," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 85-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leif Beisland & Dennis Frestad, 2013. "How fair-value accounting can influence firm hedging," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 193-217, July.
    2. Junyoup Lee & Eunsuh Lee & Kevin H. Kim & Daniel Gyung H. Paik, 2018. "Acquired In‐process Research Development and Earnings Management," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 577-588, December.
    3. Xiaomeng Chen & Andreas Hellmann & Safdar R. Mithani, 2020. "The Effect of Fair Value Adjustments on Dividend Policy Under Mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption: Australian Evidence," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(3), pages 436-453, September.
    4. Abigail Allen & Reining C. Petacchi, 2023. "Preparer Opposition and Strategic Implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards: Evidence from Public Pension Accounting Reform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 4259-4282, July.
    5. Dean Hanlon, 2019. "Mandatory accounting change and debt covenant violation: Additional evidence from SFAS 150," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 355-387, August.
    6. Linda Hughen, 2010. "When Do Accounting Earnings Matter More than Economic Earnings? Evidence from Hedge Accounting Restatements," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9‐10), pages 1027-1056, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Corporate investment and changes in GAAP," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-63, March.
    2. Dennis Oswald & Ana Simpson & Paul Zarowin, 2022. "Capitalization vs. expensing and the behavior of R&D expenditures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1199-1232, December.
    3. Roychowdhury, Sugata & Shroff, Nemit & Verdi, Rodrigo S., 2019. "The effects of financial reporting and disclosure on corporate investment: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2).
    4. Denise A. Jones, 2013. "Changes in the Funded Status of Retirement Plans after the Adoption of SFAS No. 158: Economic Improvement or Balance Sheet Management," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1099-1132, September.
    5. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2016. "Economic consequences of changes in the lease accounting standard: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 73-88.
    6. Kabir, Humayun & Su, Li, 2022. "How did IFRS 15 affect the revenue recognition practices and financial statements of firms? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. John S. Hughes & Jennifer L. Kao, 1991. "Economic implications of alternative disclosure rules for research and development costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 152-169, September.
    8. Sondes Draief & Adel Chouaya, 2012. "Effet de la gestion comptable et réelle des résultats sur le coût de la dette : analyse avant et après SOX," Post-Print hal-00691020, HAL.
    9. Rey, Andrea & Maglio, Roberto & Rapone, Valerio, 2020. "Lobbying during IASB and FASB convergence due processes: Evidence from the IFRS 16 project on leases," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. Kim, Hyun-Dong & Kim, Yura & Mantecon, Tomas & Song, Kyojik Roy, 2019. "Short-term institutional investors and agency costs of debt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 195-210.
    11. Dean Hanlon, 2019. "Mandatory accounting change and debt covenant violation: Additional evidence from SFAS 150," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 355-387, August.
    12. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Guay, Wayne R. & Weber, Joseph P., 2010. "The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 179-234, December.
    13. Randolph P. Beatty & Robert E. Verrecchia, 1989. "The effect of a mandated accounting change on the capitalization process," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 472-493, March.
    14. Thomas G. Canace & Scott B. Jackson & Tao Ma, 2018. "R&D investments, capital expenditures, and earnings thresholds," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 265-295, March.
    15. Shai Levi & Benjamin Segal, 2015. "The Impact of Debt-Equity Reporting Classifications on the Firm's Decision to Issue Hybrid Securities," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 801-822, December.
    16. Sugato Chakravarty & Chiraphol N. Chiyachantana & Christine Jiang, 2011. "THE CHOICE OF TRADING VENUE AND RELATIVE PRICE IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONAL TRADING: ADRs VERSUS THE UNDERLYING SECURITIES IN THEIR LOCAL MARKETS," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 34(4), pages 537-567, December.
    17. Preeti Choudhary & Shivaram Rajgopal & Mohan Venkatachalam, 2009. "Accelerated Vesting of Employee Stock Options in Anticipation of FAS 123‐R," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 105-146, March.
    18. Jennergren, L. Peter, 2011. "Firm Valuation with Operating Leases," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2011:3, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 30 May 2011.
    19. Begoña Giner & Francisca Pardo, 2018. "The Value Relevance of Operating Lease Liabilities: Economic Effects of IFRS 16," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 496-511, December.
    20. Sylvain Durocher, 2008. "Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 227-256, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:37:y:2007:i:s1:p:63-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.