IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v29y1999i3p239-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements

Author

Listed:
  • David Alexander

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of establishing a criterion against which auditors and others can judge the adequacy of financial reporting. Three types of criteria are considered: a general over-riding requirement (type A), an integrated coherent framework (type B), and detailed regulation (type C). Approaches, trends and arguments are presented from a number of contexts, such as UK, US and Europe. Where more than one type of criterion is present (all three exist in the UK for example) one must be superior to the others. There can only be one deciding benchmark of adequacy. It is argued that type B is inadequate as such a benchmark, as all attempted ‘conceptual’ frameworks are internally inconsistent. Types A and C are both theoretically possible, but it is argued that only Type A is consistent, as the ultimate benchmark of adequacy, with the provision of useful information in a dynamic economic world. The current IASC thinking as demonstrated in IAS1 (revised) (IASC 1977a) is discussed, and contrasted with the fundamentally different proposals in the earlier exposure draft E53 (IASC 1996). The arguments of the paper throw considerable light on this debate, and are consistent with the final content of IAS1 (revised).

Suggested Citation

  • David Alexander, 1999. "A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 239-253.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:29:y:1999:i:3:p:239-253
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1999.9729584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.1999.9729584
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.1999.9729584?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K. Van Hulle & K. U. Leuven, 1993. "Truth and untruth about true and fair: a commentary on 'A European true and fair view' comment," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 99-104.
    2. David Alexander, 1993. "A European true and fair view?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 59-80.
    3. David Alexander, 1993. "A European true and fair view?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 17-46.
    4. Christoph Kuhner, 1997. "Maintaining economic stability as a motive for statutory accounting requirements," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 733-754.
    5. David Alexander, 1996. "Truer and fairer. Uninvited comments on invited comments," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 483-493.
    6. Karel Van Hulle, 1997. "The true and fair view override in the European Accounting Directives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 711-720.
    7. David Alexander, 1997. "Stability, pseudo-stability, information and pseudo-information," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 755-766.
    8. Stephen Zeff, 1993. "International accounting principles and auditing standards," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 403-410.
    9. Dieter Ordelheide, 1996. "True and fair view," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 495-506.
    10. Peter Walton, 1993. "Introduction: the true and fair view in British accounting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 49-58.
    11. K. Van Hulle, 1993. "Harmonization of accounting standards in the EC," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 387-396.
    12. Dieter Ordelheide, 1993. "True and fair view," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 81-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Churyk, Natalie Tatiana & Stenka, Renata, 2014. "Accounting for complex investment transactions," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 58-70.
    2. Anne Marie Garvey & Laura Parte & Bridget McNally & José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Wally Smieliauskas, 2008. "A Framework for Identifying (and Avoiding) Fraudulent Financial Reporting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 189-226, August.
    4. Gordon, Isabel & Gallery, Natalie, 2012. "Assessing financial reporting comparability across institutional settings: The case of pension accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 11-20.
    5. David Alexander, 2001. "The over-riding importance of internationalism: a reply to Nobes," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 145-149.
    6. Stephen Haswell, 2006. "Over-Complexity in Accounting Standards and the Emerging Duopoly of US GAAP AND IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(39), pages 49-59, July.
    7. Alexander, David & Archer, Simon, 2000. "On the Myth of "Anglo-Saxon" Financial Accounting," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, 010.
    8. Nobes, Christopher, 2003. "On the myth of "Anglo-Saxon" financial accounting: a comment," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 95-104.
    9. Bradbury, Michael E. & Schröder, Laura B., 2012. "The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-10.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunk, Alan S. & Kilgore, Alan, 2000. "The Reintroduction of the True and Fair Override and Harmonization with IASC Standards in Australia: Lessons from the EU and Implications for Financial Reporting and International Trade," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 213-226, July.
    2. Lisa Evans, 2003. "The true and fair view and the ‘fair presentation’ override of IAS 1," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 311-325.
    3. Stephen Zeff & Willem Buijink & Kees Camfferman, 1999. "'True and fair' in the Netherlands: inzicht or getrouw beeld ?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 523-548.
    4. Axel Haller, 2002. "Financial accounting developments in the European Union: past events and future prospects," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 153-190.
    5. Alina Beattrice Vladu & Dumitru MatiÅŸ & Oriol Amat Salas, 2012. "True And Fair View And Creative Accounting Conceptual Delimitations Based On Papineau`S Tree Methodology," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(14), pages 1-9.
    6. Baker, C. Richard & Wallage, Philip, 2000. "The Future of Financial Reporting in Europe: Its Role in Corporate Governance," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 173-187, July.
    7. Katarzyna Kosmala MacLullich, 2001. "Truth and Fairness in Accounting: A Case of Polish Transition Economy," CERT Discussion Papers 0102, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    8. Lisa Evans & Rachel Baskerville & Katariina Nara, 2015. "Colliding Worlds: Issues Relating to Language Translation in Accounting and Some Lessons from Other Disciplines," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 1-36, March.
    9. Vladu Alina Beattrice & Matis Dumitru, 2012. "Importance And Vulnerability Of True And Fair View In The Romanian Accounting Environment -Case Study," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 972-977, July.
    10. Oriol Amat & John Blake & Ester Oliveras, 1999. "Spanish auditors and the 'true and fair view'," Economics Working Papers 409, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    11. Jannis Bischof & Holger Daske, 2016. "Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS Endorsement Criteria: The Case of IFRS 9," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 129-168, May.
    12. Anne Marie Garvey & Laura Parte & Bridget McNally & José Antonio Gonzalo-Angulo, 2021. "True and Fair Override: Accounting Expert Opinions, Explanations from Behavioural Theories, and Discussions for Sustainability Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Marie Zelenková, 2010. "The True and Fair View in the European Union [Věrný a poctivý obraz v Evropské unii]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(3), pages 101-110.
    14. Peter Feige, 1997. "How 'uniform' is financial reporting in Germany? - The example of foreign currency translation," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 109-122, May.
    15. Karel Van Hulle, 1997. "The true and fair view override in the European Accounting Directives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 711-720.
    16. David Alexander, 1997. "Stability, pseudo-stability, information and pseudo-information," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 755-766.
    17. Laaksonen, Jenni, 2022. "Translation, hegemony and accounting: A critical research framework with an illustration from the IFRS context," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Craner, John & Krzywda, Danuta & Novotny, Jiri & Schroeder, Marek, 2000. "The Determination of a Group for Accounting Purposes in the UK, Poland, and the Czech Republic in a Supranational Context," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 355-397, September.
    19. Alexander, David & Archer, Simon, 2000. "On the Myth of "Anglo-Saxon" Financial Accounting," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 539-557, 010.
    20. Henselmann, Klaus, 2021. "The Fourth Accounting Directive and Member State Options for Single Accounts," EconStor Preprints 248387, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:29:y:1999:i:3:p:239-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.