IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/accfor/v23y1999i2p137-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental disclosure by Australian mining companies: environmental conscience or commercial reality?

Author

Listed:
  • Carol A Tilt
  • Christopher F Symes

Abstract

Over the past couple of decades there has been a series of literature in the social accounting field that indicates a gradual increase in the amount of social disclosure appearing in company annual reports. In particular, the amount of environmental disclosures appears to have increased and a number of theories have been postulated as to why companies disclose such information. Most of these prior studies have not identified the particular items that are being disclosed except to classify them broadly as ‘environment’ related and the majority of these studies have found that mining companies disclose more than other industries. Such results have then been used to support various theories as to why disclosure is on the increase, and in particular, to indicate a new ‘commitment’ to the environment by these companies. This is an Australian study that expands current research, and provides an alternative interpretation for environmental reporting by some corporations. It shows that a large proportion of ‘environmental’ disclosures by Australian mining companies are related to rehabilitation of mine sites—this disclosure may not be influenced by a desire to be environmentally conscious, but by a resultant tax benefit from including it in the annual accounts. The findings may have implications for other countries with a large extractive industry and similar tax provisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol A Tilt & Christopher F Symes, 1999. "Environmental disclosure by Australian mining companies: environmental conscience or commercial reality?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 137-154, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:23:y:1999:i:2:p:137-154
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6303.00008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-6303.00008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6303.00008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Talbot & Guillaume Barbat, 2020. "Water disclosure in the mining sector: An assessment of the credibility of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1241-1251, May.
    2. Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi & Turki Raji Alhmoud & Belal Ali Abdulraheem Ghaleb, 2020. "Audit Committee Features and CSR Disclosure: Additional Evidence From an Emerging Market," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 226-237, October.
    3. Miley, Frances & Read, Andrew, 2021. "Soldiers don't go mad: Shell shock and accounting intransigence in the British Army 1914-18," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    4. Sidney J. Gray & Niclas Hellman & Mariya N. Ivanova, 2019. "Extractive Industries Reporting: A Review of Accounting Challenges and the Research Literature," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(1), pages 42-91, March.
    5. Linda Kusumaning Wedari & Christine Jubb & Amir Moradi‐Motlagh, 2021. "Corporate climate‐related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3721-3739, December.
    6. Hooks, Jill & van Staden, Chris J., 2011. "Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 200-213.
    7. Shidi Dong & Roger Burritt, 2010. "Cross-sectional benchmarking of social and environmental reporting practice in the australian oil and gas industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 108-118.
    8. Alistair M. Brown, 2007. "Natural environmental disclosures: strategic responses by Port Moresby Stock Exchange entities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 75-89, January.
    9. Heledd Jenkins, 2004. "Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 23-34, March.
    10. Colin Higgins & Markus Milne & Bernadine Gramberg, 2015. "The Uptake of Sustainability Reporting in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 445-468, June.
    11. Toms, Steven, 2008. "Asymmetric Response: Explaining Corporate Social Disclosure by Multi-National Firms in Environmentally Sensitive Industries," The York Management School Working Papers 42, The York Management School, University of York.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accfor:v:23:y:1999:i:2:p:137-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/racc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.