IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v53y2021i2s0890838920300767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soldiers don't go mad: Shell shock and accounting intransigence in the British Army 1914-18

Author

Listed:
  • Miley, Frances
  • Read, Andrew

Abstract

This research examines intransigence in accounting systems. Using historical research methods and archival sources, it explores intransigence in the Royal Army Medical Corps’ accounting systems in the context of the incidence of shell shock among British Army soldiers fighting at the battlefront during the First World War. The Army did not recognise shell shock as a medical condition and made few changes to its medical accounting systems for soldiers with shell shock. The four factors of system stability of the AGIL scheme (adaptation, goal attainment, integration, latency) are used to understand the limited medical accounting response to shell shock. This research indicates that in addition to historical and internal political reasons for intransigence, intransigence will occur unless a factor in the AGIL scheme is sufficiently impaired to make the accounting system unstable and force system change. This research finding has contemporary relevance, explaining accounting intransigence in response to issues of social concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Miley, Frances & Read, Andrew, 2021. "Soldiers don't go mad: Shell shock and accounting intransigence in the British Army 1914-18," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:2:s0890838920300767
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2020.100956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890838920300767
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malmmose, Margit, 2015. "Management accounting versus medical profession discourse: Hegemony in a public health care debate – A case from Denmark," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 144-159.
    2. Tarricone, Rosanna, 2006. "Cost-of-illness analysis: What room in health economics?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 51-63, June.
    3. Otley, D. T. & Berry, A. J., 1980. "Control, organisation and accounting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 231-244, April.
    4. Cooper, Christine, 2015. "Accounting for the fictitious: A Marxist contribution to understanding accounting's roles in the financial crisis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 63-82.
    5. Jane Andrew & Corinne Cortese, 2011. "Accounting for climate change and the self-regulation of carbon disclosures," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 130-138, September.
    6. F.M. Miley & A.F. Read, 2014. "Cartoons as alternative accounting: front-line supply in the First World War," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2-3), pages 161-189, November.
    7. Carol A Tilt & Christopher F Symes, 1999. "Environmental disclosure by Australian mining companies: environmental conscience or commercial reality?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 137-154, June.
    8. Warwick Funnell, 2005. "Accounting on the frontline: cost accounting, military efficiency and the South African War," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 307-326.
    9. Peter Skaerbaek, 1992. "Accounting for a theatre: implementing a management accounting system in a cultural institution," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 465-469.
    10. Andrew, Jane & Cortese, Corinne, 2011. "Accounting for climate change and the self-regulation of carbon disclosures," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 130-138.
    11. William Lin & G. W. Dean & C. V. Moore, 1974. "An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 56(3), pages 497-508.
    12. Sikka, Prem, 2009. "Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 868-873, August.
    13. Frances Miley & Andrew Read, 2012. "The implications of supply accounting deficiencies in the Australian Army during the Second World War," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 73-91, March.
    14. Walker, Stephen P., 2016. "Revisiting the roles of accounting in society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-50.
    15. Boland, Richard Jr, 1996. "Why shared meanings have no place in structuration theory: A reply to scapens and macintosh," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(7-8), pages 691-697.
    16. Hechter, Michael, 2008. "The rise and fall of normative control," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 663-676, August.
    17. Chwastiak, Michele, 2008. "Rendering death and destruction visible: Counting the costs of war," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 573-590.
    18. Chwastiak, M., 1998. "Star wars at the bottom line: The accounting forum for defense contractors," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 343-360, May.
    19. Frances Myfanwy Miley & Andrew F. Read, 2018. "“This degrading and stealthy practice”," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(2), pages 456-477, February.
    20. Collins, F & Holzmann, O & Mendoza, R, 1997. "Strategy, Budgeting, And Crisis In Latin America," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 669-689, October.
    21. Randall, Ronald, 1979. "Presidential Power versus Bureaucratic Intransigence: The Influence of the Nixon Administration on Welfare Policy," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 795-810, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2022. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework: An update," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Chwastiak, Michele, 2013. "Profiting from destruction: The Iraq reconstruction, auditing and the management of fraud," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 32-43.
    3. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Riccardo Macchioni & Annamaria Zampella, 2018. "Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1031-1056, May.
    4. Wang, Fangjun & Sun, Junqin & Liu, Yang Stephanie, 2019. "Institutional pressure, ultimate ownership, and corporate carbon reduction engagement: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 14-26.
    5. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    6. Amer Shakkour & Hamza Alaodat & Emad Alqisi & Ali Alghazawi, 2018. "The Role of Environmental Accounting in Sustainable Development. Empirical Study," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-5.
    7. Schinckus, Christophe, 2018. "Pataphysics of finance: An essay of visual epistemology," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 57-68.
    8. Axel Haller & Chris J. van Staden & Cristina Landis, 2018. "Value Added as part of Sustainability Reporting: Reporting on Distributional Fairness or Obfuscation?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 763-781, October.
    9. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Rashmeet Kaur & John Patsavellas & Yousef Haddad & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2023. "The Concept of Carbon Accounting in Manufacturing Systems and Supply Chains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Franck Aggeri & Morgane Le Breton, 2016. "The regulation of transparency in the field of CSR," Post-Print halshs-01368029, HAL.
    12. Ewelina Zarzycka & Joanna Krasodomska, 2021. "Environmental key performance indicators: the role of regulations and stakeholder influence," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 651-666, December.
    13. Guo, Jianan & Islam, Muhammad Azizul & Jain, Ameeta & van Staden, Chris J., 2022. "Civil liberties and social and environmental information transparency: A global investigation of financial institutions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    14. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen & Yiwei Guo, 2023. "Corporate Sustainable Growth, Carbon Performance, and Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure: New Panel Data Evidence for Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Rainer Kasperzak & Marko Kureljusic & Lucas Reisch & Simon Thies, 2023. "Accounting for Carbon Emissions—Current State of Sustainability Reporting Practice under the GHG Protocol," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Ismail N.B. & Sébastien Alcouffe & Galy N & Ceulemans K, 2020. "The impact of international sustainability initiatives on Life Cycle Assessment voluntary disclosures: The case of France’s CAC40 listed companies," Post-Print hal-03082800, HAL.
    17. Tom Deweerdt, 2022. "Why Is the Australian Health Sector So Far behind in Practising Climate-Related Disclosures?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, October.
    18. Marco Migliorelli, 2021. "What Do We Mean by Sustainable Finance? Assessing Existing Frameworks and Policy Risks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Tom Deweerdt & Kristin Caltabiano & Paul Dargusch, 2022. "Original Research: How Will the TNFD Impact the Health Sector’s Nature-Risks Management?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    20. David Talbot & Olivier Boiral, 2018. "GHG Reporting and Impression Management: An Assessment of Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 367-383, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:53:y:2021:i:2:s0890838920300767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.