IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v7y2020i3p2144-2169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to measure and compare the value of organizations. The case study of HEIs

Author

Listed:
  • Marzena Wójcik-Augustyniak

    (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Poland)

Abstract

In an age of general and permanent evaluation of everyone and everything, the issue of finding measures and methods of measuring value has come to the fore. Evaluation (or measurement of value) has been a subject of a number of publications; a lot of methods (better or worse) of measuring the value of organisations and workstations have been devised. The purpose of the paper is to attempt to use radar charts to support the measurement and comparison of the value of universities as an example of organisations. The research question is the following: How can radar charts be used to measure and compare the value of organisations? The hypothesis formulated assumes that radar charts can be used in various areas of analysing the value of organisations, including: to measure the value of organisations (dynamic); to make multi-criteria comparisons of organisations; to evaluate organisations from the point of view of various groups of stakeholders. The comparative research was done at 11 public universities located in 6 Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia) and two other public universities, one in Great Britain and the other in the United States, which were a type of benchmarks. The criteria constituting the value of universities that were adopted for the research were measurable (objective) factors taken into account in university rankings: Faculty/ Student Ratio, International Faculty Ratio, International Student Ratio, Citation, Industry income, Patents awarded (size-normalised), Regional joint publications, Presence and Impact. The research done with the use of radar charts let the author carry out the measurement of the value and a comparative analysis of selected universities, and draw conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marzena Wójcik-Augustyniak, 2020. "How to measure and compare the value of organizations. The case study of HEIs," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2144-2169, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:2144-2169
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(46)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/27/Wojcik-Augustyniak_How_to_measure_and_compare_the_value_of_organizations_The_case_study_of_HEIs.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/512
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(46)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gio Wiederhold, 2014. "The Value of Intellectual Capital," Management for Professionals, in: Valuing Intellectual Capital, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 35-62, Springer.
    2. Gio Wiederhold, 2014. "Valuing Intellectual Capital," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-6611-6, December.
    3. Jane Broadbent, 2007. "If You Can't Measure It, How Can You Manage It? Management and Governance in Higher Educational Institutions," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 193-198, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tibor TARNÓCZI & Veronika FENYVES, 2018. "Knowledge-Based Economy - Key Issues In The Intellectual Capital Measurement By Example Of Two Hungarian Stock Exchange Companies," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 17, pages 137-150, September.
    2. Rosanna Spanò & Adele Caldarelli & Luca Ferri & Marco Maffei, 2020. "Context, culture and control: a case study on accounting change in an Italian regional health service," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(1), pages 229-272, March.
    3. Julio B. Clempner, 2018. "Strategic Manipulation Approach for Solving Negotiated Transfer Pricing Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 304-316, July.
    4. Martin-Sardesai, Ann & Irvine, Helen & Tooley, Stuart & Guthrie, James, 2017. "Organizational change in an Australian university: Responses to a research assessment exercise," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 399-412.
    5. Thomä, Jakob & Murray, Clare & Jerosch-Herold, Vincent & Magdanz, Janina, 2019. "Do you manage what you measure? Investor views on the question of climate actions with empirical results from the Swiss pension fund and insurance sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115100, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Christian Nielsen, 2016. "Getting value for money from your science park," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 539-546, November.
    7. Bojan Krstić & Ljiljana Bonić, . "EIC: A New Tool for Intellectual Capital Performance Measurement," Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 0, pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    value; radar chart; universities; comparative analysis; stakeholders;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:7:y:2020:i:3:p:2144-2169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.