IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v2y2014i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rise and fall of the Lyon silk cluster: a case study about entrepreneurial sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Bonetto
  • Bernd Hofmann

    (Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, France)

  • Gunnar Prause

    (Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia)

Abstract

Innovation is the key driving factor for economic growth and social wealth. Already Joseph Schumpeter emphasized the importance of innovation for entrepreneurial activities by incessantly revolutionizing economic structures in order to get better or more effective processes and products. So a lack of innovation may quickly lead into business failure or – even on a sectorial level – loss of market positions. An actual example is the textile design sector located in the city of Lyon, which rose together with the Lyon silk industry for centuries and collapsed and nearly disappeared nowadays, although it occupied the world leader position up into the 1970ies (Bonetto et al. 2014). Innovation is the specific tool for entrepreneurs to exploit business opportunities and innovation is also one of the key driving factors for economic grow and social wealth. Innovative products and services emerge more often as a result of cross-sectorial combination of technologies, design and business models, especially in the context of regional clusters (Drucker 1985). Already Joseph Schumpeter emphasized the importance of innovation for entrepreneurial activities by incessantly revolutionizing economic structures in order to get better or more effective processes and products. His famously words concerning “creative destruction” stressed already the close links between entrepreneurship, innovation and design (Schumpeter 1911). Numerous articles of scholars discuss how innovation procures substantial income on the international markets and allow benefiting from competitive advantages. This paper will focus on the fact how lacking investment in innovation and specific business culture lead to situations where disadvantages take a cumulative character which strengthens the process of decline of economic competitiveness and loss of market shares. In the case study about the life-cycle of the French silk industry and its related entrepreneurial activities in the area of textile design in the city of Lyon, it is illustrated how a lack of innovation related with a specific entrepreneurial behavior is leading to a collapse of the whole sector, which, until the 1970ies, occupied a world leading position in this field. The case study is based on interviews of experts and actors involved in this business, witnesses to the activity’s collapse, on desktop research and the study of documents which analyze the evolution to the currently existing situation. Currently, only isolated persons continue on a free-lance basis the traditional activity, most of them close to retiring age. A few companies, with significantly reorganized activities do as well continue their activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Bonetto & Bernd Hofmann & Gunnar Prause, 2014. "Rise and fall of the Lyon silk cluster: a case study about entrepreneurial sustainability," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(1), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2014.2(1)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/5/Bonetto_Rise_and_fall_of_the_Lyon_silk_cluster_a_case_study_about_entrepreneurial_sustainability.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/29
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2014.2(1)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Boyd & Winn, Monika I., 2007. "Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 29-49, January.
    2. Nicolas Classen & Martin Carree & Anita Gils & Bettina Peters, 2014. "Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 595-609, March.
    3. Luc Anselin & Attila Varga & Zoltan Acs, 2008. "Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, chapter 9, pages 95-121, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Breschi, Stefano & Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 2000. "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 110(463), pages 388-410, April.
    5. Ron Boschma & Anne L. J. ter Wal, 2007. "Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 177-199.
    6. Ignas Dzemyda & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2014. "Sustainable youth entrepreneurship in conditions of global economy toward energy security," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(4), pages 247-256, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunil Tiwari & Joanna Rosak-Szyrocka & Dimpal Bharali & Sunildro L. S. Akoijam & Binoy T.A., 2023. "Demystifying the Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Sualkuchi Silk Products: Perspectives of Buyers and Sellers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Laima Gerlitz & Gunnar Klaus Prause, 2021. "Cultural and Creative Industries as Innovation and Sustainable Transition Brokers in the Baltic Sea Region: A Strong Tribute to Sustainable Macro-Regional Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Anna Maria Lis, 2020. "Development of proximity in cluster organizations," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 116-132, December.
    4. Mohamed Ramadan A. Rezk & Haiam Helmy Ibrahim & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Mahmoud M. Sakr & Leonardo Piccinetti & Leonardo Piccinetti, 2015. "Measuring innovations in Egypt: case of industry," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 3(1), pages 47-55, September.
    5. Toma Lankauskienė, 2014. "Accounting productivity in the sectors of economy: methodological aspects," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 98-106, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Hoffmann & Gunnar Prause, 2015. "How to keep open-source based innovation approaches sustainable: a view from the intellectual property perspective," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(3), pages 133-141, March.
    2. Giancarlo Giudici & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2019. "The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 815-830, April.
    3. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Stefano Usai & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2017. "Networks, Proximities, and Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 377-404, July.
    5. Coronado, Daniel & Acosta, Manuel & Fernández, Ana, 2008. "Attitudes to innovation in peripheral economic regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 1009-1021, July.
    6. Franz Tödtling & Markus Grillitsch, 2015. "Does Combinatorial Knowledge Lead to a Better Innovation Performance of Firms?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(9), pages 1741-1758, September.
    7. Tom Broekel & Thomas Brenner, 2011. "Regional factors and innovativeness: an empirical analysis of four German industries," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 47(1), pages 169-194, August.
    8. Lutz Eigenhüller & Nicole Litzel & Stefan Fuchs, 2015. "Who with whom: Co-operation activities in a cluster region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 469-497, August.
    9. Isabel Díez-Vial & Marta Fernández-Olmos, 2015. "Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: how can firms benefit most?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 70-84, February.
    10. Haschka, Rouven E. & Herwartz, Helmut, 2020. "Innovation efficiency in European high-tech industries: Evidence from a Bayesian stochastic frontier approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    11. Lawrence A. Plummer & Zoltán J. Ács, 2015. "Localized competition in the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 8, pages 145-160, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Cilem Selin Hazir & James Lesage & Corinne Autant-Bernard, 2014. "The Role of R&D Collaboration Networks on Regional Innovation Performance," Working Papers halshs-01073031, HAL.
    13. Elekes, Zoltán & Juhász, Sándor & Gyurkovics, János, 2016. "A tudáshálózatok időbeli változásának vizsgálati lehetőségei [A new perspective for examining change in knowledge networks over time]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1375-1388.
    14. Alvaro Rojas & Daniel Lorenzo, 2021. "Environmental and Social Goals in Spanish SMEs: The Moderating Effect of Family Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Kroll, Henning, 2009. "Spillovers and proximity in perspective: a network approach to improving the operationalisation of proximity," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R2/2009, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    16. Enrique Claver-Cortés & Bartolome Marco-Lajara & Encarnacion Manresa-Marhuenda, 2016. "Types of agglomeration economies: effects on business innovation," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 10(3), September.
    17. Martina Neuländtner & Thomas Scherngell, 2020. "Geographical or relational: What drives technology-specific R&D collaboration networks?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(3), pages 743-773, December.
    18. Koen Frenken & Elena Cefis & Erik Stam, 2020. "Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 10-27, July.
    19. Jurgita Raudeliūnienė & Manuela Tvaronavičienė & Ignas Dzemyda & Mohamad Sepehri, 2014. "Sustainable entrepreneurship through energy stewardship: role of values and behavioral patterns," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 2(2), pages 107-117, December.
    20. Joern Block & Roy Thurik & Haibo Zhou, 2013. "What turns knowledge into innovative products? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 693-718, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    innovation; entrepreneurship; cluster life-cycle; sustainability; textile-design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L67 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other Consumer Nondurables: Clothing, Textiles, Shoes, and Leather Goods; Household Goods; Sports Equipment
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.