IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouesi/v11y2023i1p132-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Acceptance Model for On-demand Car Functions: exploring determinants of drivers' acceptance

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Gräsner

    (UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, Spain)

  • Roland Vogt

    (FOM University of Applied Sciences, Germany)

Abstract

This research paper investigates the factors influencing drivers' acceptance of on-demand car functions (ODCFs) and proposes an integrated acceptance model specific to the ODCFs context. While limited marketing research has explored consumer responses to ODCFs, understanding the determinants of consumers' intention to accept ODCFs is crucial. Existing acceptance models, although effective in explaining variances in consumer behavior, need to be adapted and extended to enhance explanatory power in individual contexts. To address this gap, a comprehensive literature review on ODCFs and related domains was conducted, identifying 74 acceptance factors. Drawing upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the Car Technology Acceptance Model (CTAM), and the identified factors, a multi-level acceptance model tailored to the ODCFs context was developed. At the meso-level, the baseline model incorporates factors such as exposure to ODCFs, domain-specific, symbolic-affective, and moral-normative factors. The micro-level pertains to distinct individual variance components, encompassing socio-demographic attributes, travel behavioral patterns, personality dispositions, and technological inclinations. These micro-level determinants exert a discernible influence on the factors situated at the meso-level of analysis. A partial model that considers cross-level influences and advocates for multi-level research to examine the contextual factors' impacts on acceptance empirically is proposed to operationalize the model. By adopting this approach, researchers can gain deeper insights into the acceptance of ODCFs and shed light on the mechanisms underlying consumer behavior in this specific context.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Gräsner & Roland Vogt, 2023. "Integrated Acceptance Model for On-demand Car Functions: exploring determinants of drivers' acceptance," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(1), pages 132-163, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:132-163
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2023.11.1(8)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/uploads/articles/41/Grasner_Integrated_Acceptance_Model_for_Ondemand_Car_Functions_exploring_determinants_of_drivers_acceptance.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/jesi/article/1108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2023.11.1(8)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozgun Atasoy & Carey K Morewedge & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Kristin DiehlAssociate Editor, 2018. "Digital Goods Are Valued Less Than Physical Goods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(6), pages 1343-1357.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    2. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    4. Reinecke, Sven & Renner, Susanna, 2021. ""Rückbesinnung auf das Echte" - Veränderungen im Kundenverhalten, Trends und Herausforderungen in Marketing und Verkauf ab 2021," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 38(5), pages 52-59.
    5. Bender, Mark & Gal-Or, Esther & Geylani, Tansev, 2021. "Attracting artists to music streaming platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1083-1097.
    6. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 719-744, September.
    7. Valentina Romagnoli & Joachim Felix Aigner & Thomas Berlinghof & Niki Bey & Jan-Markus Rodger & Cordelia Patz, 2020. "Identification and assessment of opportunities and threats for the Circular Economy arising from E-commerce," JRC Research Reports JRC122233, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Cait Lamberton & Kelly Goldsmith, 2020. "Ownership: A Perennial Prize or a Fading Goal? A Curation, Framework, and Agenda for Future Research [“Sharing-Dominant Logic? Quantifying the Association between Consumer Intelligence and Choice o," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 301-309.
    9. Rouven Seifert & Cord Otten & Michel Clement & Sönke Albers & Ole Kleinen, 2023. "Exclusivity strategies for digital products across digital and physical markets," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 245-265, March.
    10. Kathleen S. Micken & Scott D. Roberts & Jason D. Oliver, 2020. "The digital continuum: the influence of ownership, access, control, and Cocreation on digital offerings," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 98-115, June.
    11. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "Did You Invest Less Than Me? The Effect of Other’s Share of Investment on Psychological Ownership of Crowdfunding Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Maferima Touré-Tillery & Lili Wang, 2022. "The Good-on-Paper Effect: How the Decision Context Influences Virtuous Behavior," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(5), pages 1004-1024, September.
    13. Liu, Yunxin, 2023. "How and why a touchscreen interface impacts psychological ownership and its downstream consequences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Atasoy, Özgün & Trudel, Remi & Noseworthy, Theodore J. & Kaufmann, Patrick J., 2022. "Tangibility bias in investment risk judgments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    15. Yoo, Kiwoong & Welden, Roman & Hewett, Kelly & Haenlein, Michael, 2023. "The merchants of meta: A research agenda to understand the future of retailing in the metaverse," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 173-192.
    16. Reto Hofstetter & Emanuel Bellis & Leif Brandes & Melanie Clegg & Cait Lamberton & David Reibstein & Felicia Rohlfsen & Bernd Schmitt & John Z. Zhang, 2022. "Crypto-marketing: how non-fungible tokens (NFTs) challenge traditional marketing," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 705-711, December.
    17. Rose, Stefan & Wentzel, Daniel & Hopp, Christian & Kaminski, Jermain, 2021. "Launching for success: The effects of psychological distance and mental simulation on funding decisions and crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    18. Yonit Rusho & Daphne R. Raban, 2021. "Join the club? Peer effects on information value perception," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 156-172, February.
    19. Kun Zhou & Jun Ye & Xiao-xiao Liu, 2023. "Is cash perceived as more valuable than digital money? The mediating effect of psychological ownership and psychological distance," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 55-68, March.
    20. Schaefers, Tobias & Leban, Marina & Vogt, Florian, 2022. "On-demand features: Consumer reactions to tangibility and pricing structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 751-761.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    on-demand car functions; acceptance model; UTAUT; CTAM; contextual factors; multi-level research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouesi:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:132-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.