IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v15y2025i1f15_1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Ethics Risks and Governmental Regulatory Mechanisms of Taiwan's P2P Lending Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Tzu-Chun Sheng
  • Ju-Lan Tsai
  • Hsuan-Ta Hsu

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the business ethics risks associated with the operation of Taiwan's P2P lending platforms and the regulatory mechanisms implemented by governmental authorities. Using a case study methodology, we conducted an in-depth analysis of the ethical challenges prevalent in P2P lending platforms, including the causes of ethical risk events, their impact on the platforms and investors, and the shortcomings of existing legal frameworks. The research further examines the regulatory measures taken by government agencies to safeguard investors' rights and mitigate risks such as ethical misconduct and financial fraud on P2P lending platforms. We analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of current regulatory mechanisms and proposed improvements to enhance their effectiveness and responsiveness. Finally, based on the findings, this study offers practical recommendations and strategies to reduce ethical risks and prevent financial fraud in P2P lending platforms. The research outcomes aim to assist government agencies in formulating more effective policies and measures to protect investors' rights, ensure the stability of financial markets, and promote the sustainable development of the P2P lending industry. JEL classification numbers: G23, G28, M16.

Suggested Citation

  • Tzu-Chun Sheng & Ju-Lan Tsai & Hsuan-Ta Hsu, 2025. "Business Ethics Risks and Governmental Regulatory Mechanisms of Taiwan's P2P Lending Platforms," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 1-4.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:15:y:2025:i:1:f:15_1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%2015_1_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial technology; P2P lending platforms; Governmental financial regulations; Financial fraud; Business ethics risks.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:15:y:2025:i:1:f:15_1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.