IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4028-d1077162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success Factors Influencing Peer-to-Peer Lending to Support Financial Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Natnara Chulawate

    (Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)

  • Supaporn Kiattisin

    (Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify success factors that are conducive to developing the ability to create financial innovation within developing countries for the sake of sustainability. The purpose of this research is to contribute to the identification of success factors. The case study involves a peer-to-peer lending (P2P Lending) business operator in Thailand and focuses on the lender perspective. The results consist of 13 potential factors driving financial innovation in process improvement. The study collected data from 300 respondents through a structured questionnaire. The structural equation model was used to analyze the data via Mplus version 7. In order to gain a better understanding, we emphasize that each country’s financial business may show different success factors due to different situations and environments, which might pose a challenge when drawing conclusions from the survey and building sustainability in the financial industry. The research summarizes the factors of success in 3 contexts with 13 factors; namely, the risk context consists of a higher interest rate, inflation increase, macroeconomics, regulation laws, and legal, liquidity, and finance and credit status. The trust context includes demographic characteristics, biological characteristics, and an individual’s reputational capital, and the lender perspective information context includes loan delinquencies, funded loans, politics, and culture. According to our results, the investor or lender will benefit from bringing concepts and methods that involve adopting international loans.

Suggested Citation

  • Natnara Chulawate & Supaporn Kiattisin, 2023. "Success Factors Influencing Peer-to-Peer Lending to Support Financial Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4028-:d:1077162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Galloway, 2009. "Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance," Community Investments, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, vol. 21(Win), pages 19-2339.
    2. Ian Galloway, 2009. "Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance," Community Development Working Paper 2009-06, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    3. Barasinska Nataliya & Schäfer Dorothea, 2014. "Is Crowdfunding Different? Evidence on the Relation between Gender and Funding Success from a German Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 436-452, December.
    4. Tengwen Zhang & Mingfeng Tang & Yong Lu & Dayong Dong, 2014. "Trust Building in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 250-266, October.
    5. repec:zbw:bofitp:2020_027 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Chen, Shiyi & Gu, Yan & Liu, Qingfu & Tse, Yiuman, 2020. "How do lenders evaluate borrowers in peer-to-peer lending in China?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 651-662.
    7. Agarwal, Sumit & Amromin, Gene & Ben-David, Itzhak & Chomsisengphet, Souphala & Evanoff, Douglas D., 2014. "Predatory lending and the subprime crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 29-52.
    8. Qigui Liu & Luxi Zou & Xiaolin Yang & Jinghua Tang, 2019. "Survival or die: a survival analysis on peer‐to‐peer lending platforms in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(S2), pages 2105-2131, November.
    9. Freedman, Seth & Jin, Ginger Zhe, 2017. "The information value of online social networks: Lessons from peer-to-peer lending," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 185-222.
    10. Eunjung Yeo & Jooyong Jun, 2020. "Peer-to-Peer Lending and Bank Risks: A Closer Look," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Milne, Alistair & Parboteeah, Paul, 2016. "The Business Models and Economics of Peer-to-Peer Lending," ECRI Papers 11594, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    12. Shin, Hyun Song, 2008. "Risk and liquidity in a system context," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 315-329, July.
    13. J. Benson Durham, 2006. "An estimate of the inflation risk premium using a three-factor affine term structure model," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2006-42, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    14. Zhu, Zongyuan, 2018. "Safety promise, moral hazard and financial supervision: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-5.
    15. Li, Jianwen & Hu, Jinyan, 2019. "Does university reputation matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 66-77.
    16. Jiang, Jinglin & Liao, Li & Wang, Zhengwei & Zhang, Xiaoyan, 2021. "Government Affiliation and Peer-To-Peer Lending Platforms in China," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 87-106.
    17. Douglas W. Diamond, 2007. "Banks and liquidity creation : a simple exposition of the Diamond-Dybvig model," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 93(Spr), pages 189-200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xueru Chen & Xiaoji Hu & Shenglin Ben, 2021. "How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1055-1082, December.
    2. Dongwoo Kim, 2023. "Can investors’ collective decision-making evolve? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending markets," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1323-1358, June.
    3. Wolfgang Pointner & Burkhard Raunig, 2018. "A primer on peer-to-peer lending: immediate financial intermediation in practice," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue Q3/18, pages 36-51.
    4. Gaigalienė Asta & Česnys Dovydas, 2018. "Determinants of Default in Lithuanian Peer-To-Peer Platforms," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 80(1), pages 19-36, December.
    5. Li, Jianwen & Hu, Jinyan, 2019. "Does university reputation matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 66-77.
    6. Li, Jianwen, 2023. "MSMEs meet FinTech: Chance or challenge?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    7. Jessica Gordon Nembhard, 2013. "Community Development Credit Unions: Securing and Protecting Assets in Black Communities," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 40(4), pages 459-490, December.
    8. de Roure, Calebe & Pelizzon, Loriana & Tasca, Paolo, 2016. "How does P2P lending fit into the consumer credit market?," Discussion Papers 30/2016, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    9. Eid, Nourhan & Maltby, Josephine & Talavera, Oleksandr, 2016. "Income Rounding and Loan Performance in the Peer-to-Peer Market," MPRA Paper 72852, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Jianwen Li & Jinyan Hu, 2022. "Migrants and default: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 472-505, September.
    11. Gregor Dorfleitner & Eva-Maria Oswald & Rongxin Zhang, 2021. "From Credit Risk to Social Impact: On the Funding Determinants in Interest-Free Peer-to-Peer Lending," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(2), pages 375-400, May.
    12. Faten Ben Slimane & Antoine Rousseau, 2020. "Crowdlending Campaigns for Renewable Energy: Success Factors," Post-Print hal-02371926, HAL.
    13. Oleksandr Talavera & Haofeng Xu, 2018. "Role of Verification in Peer-to-Peer Lending," Working Papers 2018-25, Swansea University, School of Management.
    14. Li, Jianwen & Zhang, Bo & Jiang, Mingming & Hu, Jinyan, 2023. "Homophilous intensity in the online lending market: Bidding behavior and economic effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Michal Polena & Tobias Regner, 2018. "Determinants of Borrowers’ Default in P2P Lending under Consideration of the Loan Risk Class," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Sha, Yezhou, 2022. "Rating manipulation and creditworthiness for platform economy: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Nadia Nahar Purkayastha & Şule Erdem Tuzlukaya, 2020. "Determination Of The Benefits And Risks Of Peer-To-Peer (P2p) Lending: A Social Network Teory Approach," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 9(3), pages 131-143.
    18. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    19. Ho, Kung-Cheng & Gu, Yan & Yan, Cheng & Gozgor, Giray, 2024. "Peer effects in the online peer-to-peer lending market: Ex-ante selection and ex-post learning," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Nigmonov, Asror & Shams, Syed & Alam, Khorshed, 2022. "Macroeconomic determinants of loan defaults: Evidence from the U.S. peer-to-peer lending market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4028-:d:1077162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.