IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v12y2022i6f12_6_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selected Methods of optimized Sampling for Index Tracking – Evidence from German Stocks

Author

Listed:
  • Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek

Abstract

The aim of this study is to verify the tracking quality of four different optimization approaches used for approximate replication (sampling) of a stock index. These approaches include relative optimization, optimization according to Markowitz, the use of regression methods and linear optimization. To test the tracking qualities of these strategies, an empirical analysis of portfolios of 10 stocks included in the German stock index DAX is used to determine the in-sample and out-of-sample results. In addition, a portfolio composition based on market capitalization and an equally weighted portfolio are considered. The analysis shows that the in-sample results are quite similar for all index tracking methods used in this study. Considering the out-of-sample results, it can be stated that all four index tracking methods lead to a portfolio that initially shows a high degree of similarity to the benchmark. However, it is surprising that the equally weighted portfolio leads to the best overall results. Therefore, the analysis presented here gives the impression that the uncomplicated equal weighting is preferable to the more sophisticated index tracking methods considered in this study. JEL classification number: G11.

Suggested Citation

  • Frieder Meyer-Bullerdiek, 2022. "Selected Methods of optimized Sampling for Index Tracking – Evidence from German Stocks," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(6), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:12:y:2022:i:6:f:12_6_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%2012_6_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Scozzari & Fabio Tardella & Sandra Paterlini & Thiemo Krink, 2013. "Exact and heuristic approaches for the index tracking problem with UCITS constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 235-250, May.
    2. Leonardo Riegel Sant’Anna & Tiago Pascoal Filomena & Pablo Cristini Guedes & Denis Borenstein, 2017. "Index tracking with controlled number of assets using a hybrid heuristic combining genetic algorithm and non-linear programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 258(2), pages 849-867, November.
    3. Tashman, Leonard J., 2000. "Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: an analysis and review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 437-450.
    4. Wu, Dexiang & Kwon, Roy H. & Costa, Giorgio, 2017. "A constrained cluster-based approach for tracking the S&P 500 index," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 222-243.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gnägi, M. & Strub, O., 2020. "Tracking and outperforming large stock-market indices," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Julio Cezar Soares Silva & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida Filho, 2023. "A systematic literature review on solution approaches for the index tracking problem in the last decade," Papers 2306.01660, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    3. Sant’Anna, Leonardo Riegel & Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Müller, Fernanda Maria & Guedes, Pablo Cristini, 2022. "Risk measure index tracking model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 361-383.
    4. Chen, Qi-an & Hu, Qingyu & Yang, Hu & Qi, Kai, 2022. "A kind of new time-weighted nonnegative lasso index-tracking model and its application," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Doering, Jana & Kizys, Renatas & Juan, Angel A. & Fitó, Àngels & Polat, Onur, 2019. "Metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: Current state and future trends," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    6. Mahdi Moeini, 2022. "Solving the index tracking problem: a continuous optimization approach," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(2), pages 807-835, June.
    7. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    8. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    9. Barrow, Devon K., 2016. "Forecasting intraday call arrivals using the seasonal moving average method," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6088-6096.
    10. Rodríguez-Vargas, Adolfo, 2020. "Forecasting Costa Rican inflation with machine learning methods," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    11. Bontempi, Gianluca & Ben Taieb, Souhaib, 2011. "Conditionally dependent strategies for multiple-step-ahead prediction in local learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 689-699, July.
    12. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "On the update frequency of univariate forecasting models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 111-121.
    13. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    14. Artur Tarassow, 2017. "Forecasting growth of U.S. aggregate and household-sector M2 after 2000 using economic uncertainty measures," Macroeconomics and Finance Series 201702, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.
    15. Zanetti Chini, Emilio, 2018. "Forecasting dynamically asymmetric fluctuations of the U.S. business cycle," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 711-732.
    16. Gautham Krishnadas & Aristides Kiprakis, 2020. "A Machine Learning Pipeline for Demand Response Capacity Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    18. Hamid Baghestani & Paul Williams, 2017. "Does customer satisfaction have directional predictability for U.S. discretionary spending?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(54), pages 5504-5511, November.
    19. Mirlatifi, A.M. & Egelioglu, F. & Atikol, U., 2015. "An econometric model for annual peak demand for small utilities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 35-44.
    20. Sbrana, Giacomo & Silvestrini, Andrea, 2013. "Forecasting aggregate demand: Analytical comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches in a multivariate exponential smoothing framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 185-198.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Index tracking; Sampling; Optimization; Tracking error; Residual risk.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:12:y:2022:i:6:f:12_6_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.